Russian designers may develop new aircraft carrier by 2023

[Dem!god]

The development and construction of a new aircraft carrier for the Russian navy could take about 10 years, a St. Petersburg-based ship design bureau said Monday. Sergei Vlasov, general director of the Nevskoye design bureau, said the overall cost of the ship could range between 100 and 250 billion rubles ($2.8-7.1 billion).

"If the ship will be armed with a variety of weaponry, its cost will skyrocket, but if it will carry only air defense systems, the cost will be less," the official said.

Vlasov said his bureau could design both a nuclear-powered and conventional version of the aircraft carrier. The former would have a deadweight of up to 85,000 metric tons, while the latter – up to 65,000 tons. The nuclear-powered ship would be able to carry some 70 aircraft and helicopters, while the conventional vessel – up to 55, he said.

Vlasov added that the new carrier would serve as a seaborne platform for new-generation fixed- and rotary-winged aircraft, in particular a fifth-generation fighter set to replace the Su-33 multirole fighter aircraft currently in service, as well as unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV).

According to Vlasov, the Russian navy needs at least four aircraft carriers: two for the Northern Fleet and two for the Pacific Fleet.

As the Navy’s Commander-in-Chief Admiral Viktor Chirkov said, aircraft carriers have long been considered a must for the Russian Navy and serialization of them would begin after 2020 under state armament programs until 2025 and beyond.

"In 2021-2030, the Navy should beef up its combat potential by serialized prospective aircraft carriers, multipurpose fourth-generation submarines and multipurpose long and shorter-range ocean ships," Chirkov said.

At present, Russia has only one aircraft carrier, the Admiral Kuznetsov, built in 1985, with a displacement of 55,000 metric tons, a crew of 1,500 and capability to carry more than 50 aircraft.

Voice of Russia, RIA
...........................................................................................................................
Ok, I do not understand this........If russia which has decades of experience in designing and operating aircarft carrier need 10 year to operationalize a aircraft carrier..how came china which is new and never operated a carrier, claim to design and operationalize 2 carriers by 2018....

 

[Commander T]

The development and construction of a new aircraft carrier for the Russian navy could take about 10 years, a St. Petersburg-based ship design bureau said Monday. Sergei Vlasov, general director of the Nevskoye design bureau, said the overall cost of the ship could range between 100 and 250 billion rubles ($2.8-7.1 billion).

"If the ship will be armed with a variety of weaponry, its cost will skyrocket, but if it will carry only air defense systems, the cost will be less," the official said.

Vlasov said his bureau could design both a nuclear-powered and conventional version of the aircraft carrier. The former would have a deadweight of up to 85,000 metric tons, while the latter – up to 65,000 tons. The nuclear-powered ship would be able to carry some 70 aircraft and helicopters, while the conventional vessel – up to 55, he said.

Vlasov added that the new carrier would serve as a seaborne platform for new-generation fixed- and rotary-winged aircraft, in particular a fifth-generation fighter set to replace the Su-33 multirole fighter aircraft currently in service, as well as unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV).

According to Vlasov, the Russian navy needs at least four aircraft carriers: two for the Northern Fleet and two for the Pacific Fleet.

As the Navy’s Commander-in-Chief Admiral Viktor Chirkov said, aircraft carriers have long been considered a must for the Russian Navy and serialization of them would begin after 2020 under state armament programs until 2025 and beyond.

"In 2021-2030, the Navy should beef up its combat potential by serialized prospective aircraft carriers, multipurpose fourth-generation submarines and multipurpose long and shorter-range ocean ships," Chirkov said.

At present, Russia has only one aircraft carrier, the Admiral Kuznetsov, built in 1985, with a displacement of 55,000 metric tons, a crew of 1,500 and capability to carry more than 50 aircraft.

Voice of Russia, RIA
...........................................................................................................................
Ok, I do not understand this........If russia which has decades of experience in designing and operating aircarft carrier need 10 year to operationalize a aircraft carrier..how came china which is new and never operated a carrier, claim to design and operationalize 2 carriers by 2018....

>Paisa bolta he mere bhai

 

[SrNair]

The development and construction of a new aircraft carrier for the Russian navy could take about 10 years, a St. Petersburg-based ship design bureau said Monday. Sergei Vlasov, general director of the Nevskoye design bureau, said the overall cost of the ship could range between 100 and 250 billion rubles ($2.8-7.1 billion).

"If the ship will be armed with a variety of weaponry, its cost will skyrocket, but if it will carry only air defense systems, the cost will be less," the official said.

Vlasov said his bureau could design both a nuclear-powered and conventional version of the aircraft carrier. The former would have a deadweight of up to 85,000 metric tons, while the latter – up to 65,000 tons. The nuclear-powered ship would be able to carry some 70 aircraft and helicopters, while the conventional vessel – up to 55, he said.

Vlasov added that the new carrier would serve as a seaborne platform for new-generation fixed- and rotary-winged aircraft, in particular a fifth-generation fighter set to replace the Su-33 multirole fighter aircraft currently in service, as well as unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV).

According to Vlasov, the Russian navy needs at least four aircraft carriers: two for the Northern Fleet and two for the Pacific Fleet.

As the Navy’s Commander-in-Chief Admiral Viktor Chirkov said, aircraft carriers have long been considered a must for the Russian Navy and serialization of them would begin after 2020 under state armament programs until 2025 and beyond.

"In 2021-2030, the Navy should beef up its combat potential by serialized prospective aircraft carriers, multipurpose fourth-generation submarines and multipurpose long and shorter-range ocean ships," Chirkov said.

At present, Russia has only one aircraft carrier, the Admiral Kuznetsov, built in 1985, with a displacement of 55,000 metric tons, a crew of 1,500 and capability to carry more than 50 aircraft.

Voice of Russia, RIA
...........................................................................................................................
Ok, I do not understand this........If russia which has decades of experience in designing and operating aircarft carrier need 10 year to operationalize a aircraft carrier..how came china which is new and never operated a carrier, claim to design and operationalize 2 carriers by 2018....

Hey dont mistrust Chinese.They are high class manufactures .
They can developed flying ACC and saucers.Sorry no offense.
PRC leaders and scientists know it will take time .But some guys in this PDF is talk like this.

 

[vostok]

The development and construction of a new aircraft carrier for the Russian navy could take about 10 years, a St. Petersburg-based ship design bureau said Monday. Sergei Vlasov, general director of the Nevskoye design bureau, said the overall cost of the ship could range between 100 and 250 billion rubles ($2.8-7.1 billion).

"If the ship will be armed with a variety of weaponry, its cost will skyrocket, but if it will carry only air defense systems, the cost will be less," the official said.

Vlasov said his bureau could design both a nuclear-powered and conventional version of the aircraft carrier. The former would have a deadweight of up to 85,000 metric tons, while the latter – up to 65,000 tons. The nuclear-powered ship would be able to carry some 70 aircraft and helicopters, while the conventional vessel – up to 55, he said.

Vlasov added that the new carrier would serve as a seaborne platform for new-generation fixed- and rotary-winged aircraft, in particular a fifth-generation fighter set to replace the Su-33 multirole fighter aircraft currently in service, as well as unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV).

According to Vlasov, the Russian navy needs at least four aircraft carriers: two for the Northern Fleet and two for the Pacific Fleet.

As the Navy’s Commander-in-Chief Admiral Viktor Chirkov said, aircraft carriers have long been considered a must for the Russian Navy and serialization of them would begin after 2020 under state armament programs until 2025 and beyond.

"In 2021-2030, the Navy should beef up its combat potential by serialized prospective aircraft carriers, multipurpose fourth-generation submarines and multipurpose long and shorter-range ocean ships," Chirkov said.

At present, Russia has only one aircraft carrier, the Admiral Kuznetsov, built in 1985, with a displacement of 55,000 metric tons, a crew of 1,500 and capability to carry more than 50 aircraft.

Voice of Russia, RIA
...........................................................................................................................
Ok, I do not understand this........If russia which has decades of experience in designing and operating aircarft carrier need 10 year to operationalize a aircraft carrier..how came china which is new and never operated a carrier, claim to design and operationalize 2 carriers by 2018....

The problem is that all carriers of the USSR were built in Nikolaev, Ukraine. In Russia, only started to build shipyard in the Far East, on which they will build ships of large tonnage.

 

[SrNair]

The problem is that all carriers of the USSR were built in Nikolaev, Ukraine. In Russia, only started to build shipyard in the Far East, on which they will build ships of large tonnage.

what about Severodvinsk shipyard.?INS Vikramaditya is builded there.

 

[vostok]

what about Severodvinsk shipyard.?INS Vikramaditya is builded there.

It was rebuilt and not built from scratch. And it took a very long time.

 

[Dem!god]

>Paisa bolta he mere bhai

paisa to bolta hai ..theek hai...
but can't paste dollars and build a carrier...you need expertise and quality to do so....

 

[vostok]

BTW, one of the causes of the coup d'etat in Ukraine - Putin has pledged billions of dollars to modernize the shipyards of Nikolaev and placing orders for these shipyards.
West and their corrupt lackeys do not need industrial modernization and development in Ukraine.

 

[ChineseTiger1986]

The problem is that all carriers of the USSR were built in Nikolaev, Ukraine. In Russia, only started to build shipyard in the Far East, on which they will build ships of large tonnage.

Well, then let Russia take back Ukraine, and we want to see the reborn of the Ulyanovsk supercarrier.

 

[vostok]

Well, then let Russia take back Ukraine, and we want to see the reborn of the Ulyanovsk supercarrier.

I really hope so, my friend. As well as all residents of the once glorious city of Russian shipbuilders - Nikolaev.

 

[neehar]

I really hope so, my friend. As well as all residents of the once glorious city of Russian shipbuilders - Nikolaev.

i'm sorry out of context.but i always wanted to ask this question to a russian..do you regret breaking up of USSR??

 

[vostok]

i'm sorry out of context.but i always wanted to ask this question to a russian..do you regret breaking up of USSR??

Of course! It was an amazing country! And I firmly believe that the socialist future of humanity will build on the invaluable experience gained by the Soviet Union!

 

[ChineseTiger1986]

i'm sorry out of context.but i always wanted to ask this question to a russian..do you regret breaking up of USSR??

If USSR didn't follow a rabid privatization and westernization, but a rational economic reform, it would have became more powerful than today's USA.

Its navy can easily sustain 10 nuclear supercarrier battlegroups, but just look at the current Russian Federation. You can see how much damage these people have done to Russia.

No Communism = No Superpower Russia

 

[vostok]

If USSR didn't follow a rabid privatization and westernization, but a rational economic reform, it would have became more powerful than today's USA.

Its navy can easily sustain 10 nuclear supercarrier battlegroups, but just look at the current Russian Federation. You can see how much damage these people have done to Russia.

No Communism = No Superpower Russia

Eurasian Union eventually will return to socialism. I believe in it.
All mankind have only two ways - either socialism or the future will be similar to such films as "Metropolis", "Elysium", "The Hunger Games." Super-developed West with fantastic technology and almost immortal life and the rest of the population as powerless slaves.