What's new

Russia: We will not protect the regime of Bashar al-Assad from the US, Israeli or other raids !!

The SC

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Feb 13, 2012
Messages
32,233
Reaction score
21
Country
Canada
Location
Canada
1493414782560629100.jpg


The Russian ambassador to Lebanon, Alexander Zaspkin, stressed that his country is not interested in defending the Syrian regime in the face of the attacks launched by Israel and the US strikes. He said that Russia's goal in Syria is "to confront terrorist groups, not to clash with anyone else, whether Americans, Israelis or others. . In an interview with Asharq Al-Awsat, Zasbekin denied that there were Iranian-Russian differences in Syria, describing it as "rumors." He stressed that the fate of Bashar al-Assad and the formation of the regime must be determined by the Syrians themselves, and felt that the experience of overthrowing regimes in the region «did not lead to national reconciliation, but on the contrary, there are wars and the disintegration of countries»

From the beginning it was known that the aim of Russian participation was to combat terrorist groups in Syria, not to clash with any other party, whether Americans, Israelis or others. We are carrying out this task. Anything else that could happen is happening in defense of the Russian air force in Syria. The Syrian regime and the army carry out the tasks related to protecting the sovereignty of Syria, and we support it in this regard.

http://aawsat.com/home/article/9136...-لا-نريد-صداماً-مع-إسرائيل-أو-أميركا-في-سوريا
 
. . .
It is somewhere near muslim unity: in a place where fish talk and trees walk.
lolz.. i meant if russia dont fight for syria then muslim nato should fight for syria.. otherwise what's good of muslim NATO
 
. . .
I am confused.

The Russians are there to support their ally in the region, Assad. Defending his regime from attack has to be their goal.

Looks like they are saying 'we can't defend against strikes'.

Raising the white flag?
 
.
@Natan what do say about it? it is conspiracy or truth?
Conspiracy.

lolz.. i meant if russia dont fight for syria then muslim nato should fight for syria.. otherwise what's good of muslim NATO
Yes, I understand.

Point is, that the original NATO was created by member states who where really threatened by USSR and the expansion of Communism. They had a mighty common enemy with solid expansive ideology.
And you suggest a Muslim NATO because Israel is your common enemy? Do you really believe that Israel is willing to take over the entire Muslim world, from Morocco to Indonesia?
 
.
Conspiracy.


Yes, I understand.

Point is, that the original NATO was created by member states who where really threatened by USSR and the expansion of Communism. They had a mighty common enemy with solid expansive ideology.
And you suggest a Muslim NATO because Israel is your common enemy? Do you really believe that Israel is willing to take over the entire Muslim world, from Morocco to Indonesia?
jewish & muslims have similar things in their religions.. i suggest muslim NATO not against any country.. but
Withdrawal of other army and power inside syria.. syrian territory should belong to syria only
 
.
jewish & muslims have similar things in their religions.. i suggest muslim NATO not against any country.. but
Withdrawal of other army and power inside syria.. syrian territory should belong to syria only
Good luck with that.
 
. . .
What do u smoke, seriously???
withdrawal of anyother army except syrian army only syrian army should have right to protect syria in future.. but right now syria is very weak so everyone should help syria Army .
the muslim NATO , russia everyone should help syria
 
Last edited:
. .
withdrawal of anyother army except syrian army only syrian army should have right to protect syria in future.. but right now syria is very week so everyone should help syria Army .
the muslim NATO , russia everyone should help syria
Should and will are two poles of the earth, learn to differentiate between them n how does israel come into the equation:hitwall:
 
.
Back
Top Bottom