Russia-Ukraine War - News and Developments

[SalarHaqq]

What makes you think its improbable or impossible to do such a thing when terrorist groups or even individuals only have done it before by hijacking aircraft to get their demands through? Only difference was ramming jets into buildings.

...and hijacking not just one but four planes on the very same day, with all taking off inside the USA and alleged hijackers thus having been checked by American airport security; plus some of the alleged hijackers having been monitored before by intelligence services of various NATO regimes and thus having been known to authorities as potentially dangerous persons; plus the fact that pilot licences obtained by alleged hijackers were not for large commercial jet liners and that a complex maneuver was flown by at least one of them prior to hitting the building; that after the attacks, the father of another claimed his son was alive and well; that sites such as the Pentagon are expected to be protected by air defence; that if it were so simple to fool US security agencies, many more attacks using the same modus operandi would have been likely occurred, and long before September 2001.

http://www.globalresearch.ca/how-th...-hanjour-alleged-hijack-pilot-of-aal-77/14290

That's beside other holes in the official version of the event, which are too numerous and too much off-topic to cite.

 

[SalarHaqq]

Obviously you have not read the treaty.
It is noted in the treaty that smoke munition has incendiary effects, but is still not incendiary weapons.

View attachment 844728

So the use of smoke munition can never be considered a war crime based on this treaty, regardless if the smoke munition contains White Phosphorus or not.

As explained, the rationale upon which the Protocol establishes a distinction between incendiary weapons on the one hand, and weapons which have incendiary effects but aren't considered actual incendiary weapons on the other, is the question whether said effect is of an incidental nature or not. Examples cited by the treaty (illuminants, tracers, smoke or signalling systems) aren't employed to damage objects nor to kill or injure people. Also, the treaty defines incendiary weapons as arms whose primary purpose is to destroy material or kill personnel.

If white phosphorous is used with the exclusive and precise purpose to destroy objects or to wound and kill humans, rather than to produce smoke, it then fits the criteria constitutive of the treaty's definition of an incendiary weapon, and its incendiary effect is no longer incidental but central. If employed in such a manner, white phosphorous therefore turns into an incendiary weapon.

This is also the common reading of the treaty by legal experts.

 

[Vergennes]

LMAO

https://twitter.com/x/status/1526668894047551490

 

[The SC]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1526691858914676736

There is no position or line of defense that can withstand infinitely. As soon as the attacker discovers the features of the defense and its most important lines, locations and fortifications, the firepower and the focused defense will be exhausted, and will be forced to retreat..

From here comes the importance of flexibility by withdrawal and counter-attack to restore what has been lost from lands and lines of defense..

Defense in cities with light and medium weapons without counterattack and without forces outside the city that invest that steadfastness and launch the counterattack to destroy the enemy forces are doomed to defeat in the end..

In Stalingrad, the Sixth German Army was not destroyed by the forces holding out in the city, but by a counter-attack and an encirclement..

In Berlin, despite all the preparations, fortifications and generous quantities of Panzerfaust, the attacking forces, with the most numerous in men, artillery and tanks in the end were able to reduce the resistance in the city to pockets and sectors and destroy it..

 

[The SC]

Right now, several dozen Azov militants are trying to surrender and are breaking out from the territory of Azovstal. On the spot, large forces of the troops of the DPR and Russia, special groups of the Internal Troops of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the DPR receive prisoners.
Hungry and betrayed by their command, the Nazis flee the catacombs.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1526680405633556484

https://twitter.com/x/status/1526683778868977666

https://twitter.com/x/status/1526453495762755585

 

[The SC]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1526327388300267526

 

[_Nabil_]

It did not worth 500 billions, it worth what it was worth at the time of siezure. Which if I have to guess, zero.

Because you don't have the French or whoever to pay you when you confiscated those site, Which mean those recovering site would not cost you any money but at the same time it will not make you any money. You may be able to craw something back from selling whatever it was inside that factory but you wouldn't be able to see it oversea as Russia have no capability to convert foreign currency to rouble, which mean it worth nothing.

Those site only worth 500 billions or so revenue if they were there to make whatever they are making, if they are not, then only asset worth anything. Which most asset would have been pull if they aren't nailed down before they were confiscated, which mean they only worth a fraction of their original revenue,

Don't worry Chinese will buy anything available

 

[Oldman1]

...and hijacking not just one but four planes on the very same day, with all taking off inside the USA and alleged hijackers thus having been checked by American airport security; plus some of the alleged hijackers having been monitored before by intelligence services of various NATO regimes and thus having been known to authorities as potentially dangerous persons; plus the fact that pilot licences obtained by alleged hijackers were not for large commercial jet liners and that a complex maneuver was flown by at least one of them prior to hitting the building; that after the attacks, the father of another claimed his son was alive and well; that sites such as the Pentagon are expected to be protected by air defence; that if it were so simple to fool US security agencies, many more attacks using the same modus operandi would have been likely occurred, and long before September 2001.

http://www.globalresearch.ca/how-th...-hanjour-alleged-hijack-pilot-of-aal-77/14290

That's beside other holes in the official version of the event, which are too numerous and too much off-topic to cite.

Hijacking 4 planes is not that hard when coordinated. Also you be surprised how flimsy with intelligence sharing by different countries, even many have pass through security checks in pre 9/11. They also have done simulations in flying and have done actually flying for small planes but its enough when hijacking a plane already in flight and change directions. Don't have to worry about landing or taking off. The skies over the Pentagon is not that secured pre 9/11 especially against passenger planes intent to crash. People have hit highly secure buildings like the White House.

Anyways the Saudi Government admitted that some of their citizens were involved.

This was in 1994.

This man will not be invited often to the show

He was invited twice already. I would be curious if he gets a third.

 

[Wood]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1526667770481475586

 

[SalarHaqq]

Hijacking 4 planes is not that hard when coordinated.

It's hard when some of the alleged perpetrators had been known and watched by security services before.

Also you be surprised how flimsy with intelligence sharing by different countries, even many have pass through security checks in pre 9/11.

In that case many more such attacks would have happened, those motivated would have seized the opportunity.

They also have done simulations in flying and have done actually flying for small planes but its enough when hijacking a plane already in flight and change directions. Dont' have to worry about landing or taking off.

They didn't master complex maneuvers.

The skies over the Pentagon is not that secured pre 9/11 especially against passenger planes intent to crash. People have hit highly secure buildings like the White House.

Suddenly they're asking us to believe that mighty USA was this negligent about securing key facilities. You're free to do so if you choose to accept whatever the regime in Washington will peddle, but some critical thinking never hurt anyone.

 

[Oldman1]

It's hard when some of the alleged perpetrators had been known and watched by security services before.

No its not that hard otherwise they be caught and arrested in the States early on. Even in post 9/11 there have been terrorist attacks. No system is perfect.

In that case many more such attacks would have happened, those motivated would have seized the opportunity.

Thats because not many are suicidal or motivated to do such a thing. How many times have you seen people hijacking large commercial planes and crashing them into buildings?

They didn't master complex maneuvers.

Turning a plane is not complex maneuvers, they are not doing a fighter maneuvers, you just reaching.

Suddenly they're asking us to believe that mighty USA was this negligent about securing key facilities. You're free to do so if you choose to accept whatever the regime in Washington will peddle, but some critical thinking never hurt anyone.

You didn't see the video. There are many gaps in our security. Look at Pearl Harbor, surprise attack and we didn't prevent it.

 

[The SC]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1526704470129881091

https://twitter.com/x/status/1526706880709644290

 

[Oldman1]

At this stage, it's not going to be picky, they would need everything they can get their hands on to push the Russian out, but in a long term, or even medium to long term and within this war, they need to look at singular platform for their stuff.

That is why if the Brits and Polish firm really are going to make the 2S22, this is where the Ukrainian want to go, it's a system they familiar with, and they were being made in the safety of Britain and Poland. You don't need no retraining, and it would perfectly fit into the Ukrainian direction.

They would needed to be a requirement, it is a necessity.

Wonder if the U.S. or some other countries can provide Ukraine a more permanent western SAM system? To protect strategic value sites like Lviv, Kiev, Odessa, etc. from cruise missiles. Patriot systems maybe in secure areas, beyond Russian control territory that it won't fall into enemy hands. Also the U.S. and Europeans should get ahold of thousands of supply trucks or vans whether military or civilian versions with off road capability since logistics is very important obviously the Russians learned it the hard way. Ukrainians will also need to be masters of logistics and learn it.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1526585331318984705

https://twitter.com/x/status/1525909891973521409

 

[The SC]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1526712511793332226

 

[CAPRICORN-88]

Seriously? That isn’t even a rally. What happened to all of support “you people” claim Putin has

That is why a democracy like the US does not represent thr will of the American people, has never produced a competent leadership and the power these leadership has became absolute. And we know what absolute power do and who the deep state feeds.

Its new definition is the people by the government, for the government and yo the government.

And who is the real Government of the US?

The deep state, of course.