Here you go.
They are expecting [read planning] to turn it into an
insurgency @9:53+ again
@10:10+ they expect [plan] that
this will continue for a very long time, years.
@15:17+
we're gonna help them fight [a protracted insurgency]. [
Instead of helping towards a ceasefire, will help them fight].
These instigators talk high of Ukrainian people, how children are suffering in NICUs, but
how do they plan to help mitigate those sufferings? By sending more Javelins and weapons and insurgents, instead of hastily bringing a ceasefire solution!. In addition they will help the suffering Ukrainians by banning Russian oil, oil, oil, oil, oil, oil, oil, oil, oil, oil, oil, oil . . . goes on for half an hour.
That may be the plan of instigators but
if Russians are successful at encircling the country, then insurgency won't get fuel and will wither soon.
Probably
that's why instigators are in a rush to supply as much weapons as quickly as possible, instead of rushing to achieve some sort of ceasefire.
"Hurry before our routes are blocked".
Why I'm feeling deja-vu I wonder? Hmm, oh yes, the 1000+ NATO containers unaccounted for in Pakistan.
Anyways, if they were sincere about Ukrainian civilians, as they
poorly pretend, then they would be heard talking about going to the table. Not the case here.
@4:23+
Russians are
trying [not quite successful though] to
not hit even the barracks of Ukrainian soldiers. Only the infrastructure.
I think that's a cheap shot.
I see that much crowd in IKEA on a normal day.
Westerners are seen twice a years, fighting on boxing day/black friday sales over a TV? I thought they were "
more civilized than Iraqis and Syrians/Libyans"!!.
At least Russians were very disciplined.
(
click to watch age-restricted video directly on YouTube instead of embedded here)
My thoughts on Zaporizhzhya Nuclear Power Plant footages:
If Russians were to take control of plant, they won't attack the plant itself.
If those CCTV show fires/explosions on the plant itself then it could possibly be the retreating ones sabotaging the plant.
Russian FM
Lavrov alluded to such acts by retreating Ukrainian army
@2:10+ in his video above.
And we have precedence of decommissioned Chernobyl nuclear plant under joint protection with Ukrainian forces. Why would Russians do it differently with a working one.
Magnitude-wise, those fires and small duds seen on CCTV footage from reactor don't seem to coincide with what Russians have been firing so far on Ukraine.
Unless I missed any big ones!
I at first thought that was just arcing, as there must be electric grid. Or flares.
They did attack a dam though earlier. But they said it was to release the water of Crimea that was blocked. And it was more like a beaver dam with no catastrophic results. Just slowly flowing water.
"
Would you mind not shooting at the . . . "
web.archive.org
