nang2
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Dec 14, 2015
- Messages
- 5,742
- Reaction score
- 2
- Country
- Location
Maybe US is just comfortable with a 2-front war.The NATO eastern flank issues will linger for some time besides EU feels under geninue threat
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Maybe US is just comfortable with a 2-front war.The NATO eastern flank issues will linger for some time besides EU feels under geninue threat
Maybe US is just comfortable with a 2-front war.
I wish you'd look at the statistics.
Poland: inflicted 17k German casualties, destroyed 1000+ vehicles, shot down 270 planes. Took 1 month.
Invasion of Poland - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org
France inflicted 27k German casualties, destroyed 800+ tanks, shot down 1000+ planes. Took 3 weeks.
Battle of France - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org
Ukrainian own claim is 4000 Russian soldiers, 200 tanks and 4 planes.
They're doing worse than France and Poland vs Nazi Germany.
I don't think it is simply a case of someone letting some others in his home. It is a humanitarian crisis and accepting those who run away from a war is a humanitarian act, not some simple hospitality. A humanitarian act means to act based on humanity. Now, in this case, they seem to have different definitions of humanity.The entire east europe hosts no foreign population citizens because nobody even goes there in the first place because they are poor these eastern european countries. It's all West Europe.
Besides I don't even understand why he has to be so passionate about it. It is his home and he has the right to not let anyone he doesn't want in and don't see why some even pressing him for other ways and the woman questioning didn't even asked him about that question.. But either way that is his home and you only let in whomever you want there is no pressure here
I don't think it is simply a case of someone letting some others in his home. It is a humanitarian crisis and accepting those who run away from a war is a humanitarian act, not some simple hospitality. A humanitarian act means to act based on humanity. Now, in this case, they seem to have different definitions of humanity.
Why are you comparing two different scales of warfare?
This post has a useless +ve rating.
That is true. Through this free choice, they reveal their true feelings and opinions. So long as they don't pretend to be humane, I am OK with it. But I am not OK with bullshit and hypocrisy.I am firm believer in free choice whether it is humantarian act or whatever else. A person should have the right to invite whomever he pleases to his home and there is no crime in that..
Or at least most attractive at the moment. The world is filled with ideas. Some parallel and some contestant. Parallel ideas, we can live with. Contestant ideas, not so much.
Good lord! Where have you been in the last 300 years? America is notorious in regulations.But there are some pitfalls here too. Like all phenomena i nature, everything has a positive and less positive side. Forexample, what made America great also is becoming its bane; non-regulatory capitalism.
What's interesting about it?PS. It is interesting that Iran abstained from the UNGA vote??!!
What's to be fortified is far bigger than just in geographical domain, the 1% US is not stupid.The one country that benefits from this war then any other countries is ''CHINA'' because the US was about to fortify the far east in Japan, South Korea, Guam and Okinawa but due to NATO eastern flank issues the US attention is diverted from the far east for atleast the next decade or half
Any country that has some stake in the relationship with US and Russia will likely abstain. It is just to reflect the reality.While there are lots of talk about Indias UN voting related to this war. One country that escaped this kind of discussion is surprisingly China. They have also abstained both the times at UNSC and UNGA while anyone would expect them to have voted in favor of Russia.