What's new

Russia-Ukraine War - News and Developments

Status
Not open for further replies.
Actually, a 10t-1 kiloton variable yield W54 weighted 23kg for about 30cm diameter. With thermonuclears, the weight to yield ratio is 4 Megaton per ton => 250kg= 1Mt, see the W59... We can reduce the weight and even making clean thermonuclears by replacing the 4.4kg of Pu239 used as a 1st stage primmer (you need a small A-bomb to trigger a H-bomb) by a little antimatter so cheap fuel like liquid deuterium can go fusion w.o an A-Bomb.
Binden doesn't wants to supply stuff that may strike Moscow for totally different reasons.

He perfectly knows that the Russians won't dare attacking the USA directly, BTW, they long brought stuff allowing Iran to attack US militaries in the Mid-East and the Soviets backed ALL terrorism against the West until Gorbachev came to power.
The real reason is the same USA drags feet on some deliveries and even refused that NATO taking care of transferring Poland's MiG-29s :
the goal is NOT the Russian invasion being promptly defeated !!!
Biden's goal is to weaken Russian military as well as f*ck-up its international status...
Even the arms sales are to fall : Russia has already lost half of its modern tanks, UVZ and ChVZ have even stopped production as targetting systems need western parts, so is it for the laser designation systems on aircraft : it's a licence-built outdated Thales Damocles, you need EU-made parts...
But with the turret throwing contest and Sukhois unable to achieve air superiority or SEAD, who wants to buy a T-90 or a Su-35 while a Soviet-era MiG-29 has just shot down a brand new Su-35?
How d'you think Russia's best client that is India feels?
BTW, Rafale is eating all Russian jets' traditional turf... and for good reasons: US even need to rig the competitions to sell their F-35...

By proceeding this way, Biden is dragging the Russian military into a total quagmire with gigantic gear losses, and 2 more months and they end with as much fatalities in 5-6 months as USA over 10 years in Vietnam! Moreover, Russia is not even attacking a serious client: Poland or Greece are way more powerful than Ukraine!!!
Moreover, 50-60% of Russia's exports normally go to the EU which actually prevented Russia from collapsing when the USSR crashed, and this was despite a trade deficit because, hey, what Russia imports from the EU is nowhere near what EU purchases from Russia and closed the eyes on many of Putin's and even Yeltsin's abuses...
Meanwhile Putin is doing shit, even interfering into EU' domestic policy by funding neo-fascists and neo-Nazi political-parties into the EU...


There were two, we sold'em to Egypt, and the sale was suspended as soon they invaded Crimea in 2014! There were no reasons to refuse when the contract was penned, before Killary/Obongo started to put pressure on Russia, they were willing to anchor with the west, including the EU and NATO, see NATO Partnership for Peace :
Russia is still in, as well as in another NATO institution, the Euro-Atlantic Partnership Council...

This is what happens when USA blocks ITAR certificates on spare parts for the C13-2 catapults, E-2C Hawkeye, E-3F Sentry to piss off France as well as pressuring its traditional clients away from buying Rafale, BTW, when you ruin our business in Iraq or our submarine sales to Australia, well, we have industries to run. I think we should resume proliferation, e.g. selling nukes to Taiwan, Korea, as well as creating an EU nuclear sharing : you crossed the Rubycon by selling nuclear submarines to Australia...
BTW, It was USA that funded the Vietminh and the Algerian FLN against us, both later turned to the Soviets against you and YOU created al-Qaeda. WE made the existence of the USA possible in 1775, you helped all European monarchies at crushing the young French Republic as soon as 1793... You were nowhere to be seen on any WW1 battlefield until July 1918, and it took you from 1939 to June 6th 1944 to remember where your oldest ally was located on a map during WW2, so, a good advise : never lecture your daddy who changed your diapers or be reminded the smell of your poo right under your nose...

Then, without USA's interferences, Ukraine would have started receiving Rafales for about 2-3 years now, but hey, you freaking want 100% of the market! You already have 85% of the NATO market for jet fighters whle not even selling the best ones, still not enough?

Then, what d'you think about the US training of Russian VDV paratroopers in Colorado?

Oh, BTW, you surely remember PEGIDA mass protests in Germany a few years ago? Do you know how these stopped? How funny, Merkel expelled ALL CIA operatives in the country. 4 weeks later, their weekly mass protests had shrunk to a few dozens of looneys...
And whatabout NSA taping the phones of all EU leaders and major business?

BTW, all this mess in Ukraine was caused by an US foreign policy named "Global Energy Dominance", this is why you did put pressure on Russia knowing that, as usual, they'd go bonkers and do something stupid !!!!
It's also why you corner Venezuela and fucked-up Libya or Iraq...
Now you're cornering Russia, how funny, Iran is no more under sanctions and has near tripled its economy and entered the G20... Now guess why MBS and MBZ refuse to talk to Biden and my 2cts Bennett is furious too!
Be aware that they're absolutely entitled at taking direct actions on Iran, accordingly to the Hague Convention, since Iran's proxies attack them all, and it's very probably in the pipeline, likely once UAE gets a few Rafales since the 4 Rezonans OTHRs Putn sold to Iran "see" F-35...

You'd better stop such little games on allies at US level, and at yours at starting lecturing your partners
Oh and I scanned the rest, pretty much a blame America paragraph. Please don’t tell me you actually think the Rafael is better than the f-35 or f-22? The f-35 has more computing power than any modern fighter and the Rafael isn’t even stealth
 
Simply adding rhetoric doesnt change the reality - that people who were not even seen as human in west ( by law then) were bombed indiscriminately. The UN resolution then was passed without presence of Soviet Union and china was represented ridiculously by Taiwan. Also what is north korea "invading" south korea - both are koreas. how can Korea invade Korea.
That's exactly what you're doing : adding rhetoric.
In 1910, Korea was annexed by the Empire of Japan. In 1945, after the Japanese surrender at the end of World War II, Korea was divided into two zones along the 38th parallel, with the north occupied by the Soviet Union and the south occupied by the United States. Negotiations on reunification failed, and in 1948, separate governments were formed: the socialist and Soviet-aligned DPRK in the north, and the capitalist, Western-aligned Republic of Korea in the south. The Korean War began in 1950, with an invasion by North Korea, and lasted to 1953.
:cuckoo:
 
FUFrBsZX0AAWyhs


FUFrRiqXwAIU5jp
 
Interview with Youssef Hindi

Ukraine is considered by a number of Israeli Jews as their property

Arthur Sapaudia: Dear Youssef, thank you for granting me this interview. When did you start to take an interest in the issues that concern you, that is to say, among others, Zionism, the clash of civilizations, Jewish messianism, secularism... What was your trigger?

Youssef Hindi:
There was no trigger. I have been interested in politics, history, sociology, anthropology, geopolitics and many other fields since adolescence. I made a name for myself with my first book, Occident et Islam – Tome 1: Sources et genèse messianiques du Sionisme (2015, ed. Sigest), which is the result of my research on the religious origins of Zionism whose official history traced its birth to the late 19th century in the mind of Herzl, a Jewish atheist. My research on the subject, started ten years ago, was motivated by historiographical shortcomings in the genealogy of Zionism. This is what led me to study Jewish messianism and Jewish mysticism (the Kabbalah) about ten years ago. This is how I discovered the origins of Zionism and the strategy of the clash of civilizations. At the same time, I opened other research projects and wrote nine books in total to date.

Who are your precursors in the fields mentioned and what books would you recommend reading in addition to yours?

On the messianic origins of Zionism and the strategy of the clash of civilizations, I am the first, to my knowledge, to have traced its genealogy, from the 13th century to the present day. But like any researcher, I am not starting from scratch. Authors have allowed me, by their contributions as much as by their shortcomings, to advance and direct my research. Among them is the historian Shlomo Sand who believed that Zionism was born in the English millenarian Protestant circles of the 17th century. It was my disagreement with him, upon reading his 2008 book, The Invention of the Jewish People, that prompted me to research the Jewish origins of Zionism. He argued that the Zionist project could not have been born in the Jewish tradition since the Talmud forbade the return of the Jewish people to the Holy Land. And he believed, like Thierry Meyssan after him, that the idea of repatriating the Jewish people to Palestine to hasten the coming of the Messiah was exclusively Protestant millenarian. My intuition told me that these Protestant millennials had been influenced by Jewish messianism. It was not difficult for me to demonstrate. But the most difficult thing was to discover how this messianic Zionist project had emerged in the Jewish world.

A few years later, I read the fascinating book by the great reporter Douglas Reed, The Controversy of Zion, which he wrote in the 1950s. Douglas Reed saw that Zionism had its roots in the Jewish religion, but he could not demonstrate it. His mistake was to link Zionism to the Talmud, while the latter forbids the return of Jews to the Holy Land before the arrival of the Messiah of the Jews. In defense of Douglas Reed, he was not a research historian or specialist in Judaism, and had no knowledge of Kabbalah; his book is, as he wrote in conclusion, a testimony that future historians had to validate with evidence.

It was then that I began to study the history, concepts and evolution of Jewish mysticism (the Kabbalah) and messianism, because I sensed that it was in this current that I would find the origins of the zionist project. So I immersed myself in the books of Gershom Scholem which were very useful to me in understanding Kabbalah and messianism. But there again, Scholem did not link Zionism to Kabbalah and messianism. And I had to do more precise research on key periods and characters to resolve this “historical problem”.

It is very difficult for a neophyte to distinguish between Gnosis, Kabbalah, messianism, alchemy, magic... How do you find your way around and what would be their common basis?

Kabbalah was strongly influenced by Gnosticism which originated from beliefs coming from both ancient Persian religion [Mazdeism], Greek religion and certainly other beliefs from both the Mediterranean and India via Mesopotamia. Kabbalah is composed of several branches: apocalyptic, cosmology, angelology, demonology and magic. As for Jewish messianism, it has, over the centuries, been largely penetrated by the Kabbalah. But I strongly advise against venturing into the study of Kabbalah for those who do not have a solid theological foundation. They will get lost there.

Do you think what is happening currently in Ukraine is an integral part of active messianism?

As I explained recently1, it is first of all about the geopolitical confrontation between the United States and Russia. This is the old strategy of the Anglo-American thalassocratic power, one of the main objectives of which is to take control of Eurasia. A project that is naturally opposed by Russia, a tellurocratic power, threatened with destruction. But Jewish messianism is not far away. Ukraine is considered by a number of Israeli Jews as their property. Moreover, President Zelinski is himself a Jew, just like his master, the billionaire Igor Kolomoiski (holder of Ukrainian, Israeli and Cypriot citizenship) who financed the neo-Nazi battalions of Ukraine. Kolomoiski also lives in Israel.

In an article published in September 2015, I analyzed the Zionist strategy vis-à-vis Russia2, which was combined with US geostrategy. Israel, via the pro-Israeli lobby3, uses, in particular since the turning point of September 11, 2001, the United States and NATO as a tool for the destruction of Russia's historical allies in the Middle East, which leads to even greater animosity between Russians and Americans.

At the same time, the Zionist leaders are trying, through intermediaries, to negotiate with Russia so that it abandons its Syrian and Iranian allies. In July 2013, Prince Bandar, as a representative of Saudi Arabia (Israel's ally), met with Vladimir Putin during the Syrian crisis. During the talks, Bandar allegedly proposed an economic, oil and gas agreement to Vladimir Putin, in exchange of which he would have to let go of Iran, abandon President Assad and deliver Syria to terrorists4. At the time, I analyzed the fire lit a few months later in Ukraine as an American-Israeli response to the Russian refusal. Moreover, Israel was preparing to deliver weapons to Ukraine a month or two after the start of the civil war. Putin then warned the Jewish state.

1 https://strategika.fr/2022/02/26/le...tan-russie-conference-audio-de-youssef-hindi/
2 http://www.geopolintel.fr/article970.html
3 John J. Mearsheimer and Stephen M. Walt, The pro-Israel lobby and American foreign policy, La Découverte, 2007.
4 Al Manar, “What was not revealed about the stormy Bandar-Putin encounter”, August 21, 2013.
5 Sputnik, “Putin warns Israel against arms deliveries to Kyiv”, 18 April 2015.

https://sapaudia.org/2022/03/07/entretien-avec-youssef-hindi-03-22/
 
Last edited:
Moscow’s concentration on seizing Severodonetsk and Donbas generally continues to create vulnerabilities for Russia in Ukraine’s vital Kherson Oblast, where Ukrainian counter-offensives continue. Kherson is critical terrain because it is the only area of Ukraine in which Russian forces hold ground on the west bank of the Dnipro River. If Russia is able to retain a strong lodgment in Kherson when fighting stops it will be in a very strong position from which to launch a future invasion. If Ukraine regains Kherson, on the other hand, Ukraine will be in a much stronger position to defend itself against future Russian attack. This strategic calculus should in principle lead Russia to allocate sufficient combat power to hold Kherson. But Russian President Vladimir Putin has chosen instead to concentrate all the forces and resources that can be scraped together in a desperate and bloody push to seize areas of eastern Ukraine that will give him largely symbolic gains. Continuing successful Ukrainian counter-offensives in Kherson indicate that Ukraine’s commanders recognize these realities and are taking advantage of the vulnerabilities that Putin’s decisions have created.

The Ukrainian leadership has apparently wisely avoided matching Putin’s mistaken prioritization. Kyiv could have committed more reserves and resources to the defense of Severodonetsk, and its failure to do so has drawn criticism.[1] Ukrainian forces are now apparently withdrawing from Severodonetsk rather than fighting to the end—a factor that has allowed the Russians to move into the city relatively rapidly after beginning their full-scale assault.[2] Both the decision to avoid committing more resources to saving Severodonetsk and the decision to withdraw from it were strategically sound, however painful. Ukraine must husband its more limited resources and focus on regaining critical terrain rather than on defending ground whose control will not determine the outcome of the war or the conditions for the renewal of war.

Sound Ukrainian prioritization of counter-offensive and defensive operations pushed the Russians almost out of artillery range of Kharkiv City and have stopped the Russian advances from Izyum—both of which are more important accomplishments than the defense of Severodonetsk. Ukraine’s leadership has had to make incredibly difficult choices in this war and has generally made the right ones, at least at the level of strategic prioritization and in the pace, scale, and ambitiousness of its counter-offensives. That is why Ukraine still has a good chance to stop and then reverse the gains Russia is currently making.

 
At best there are a couple thousand Chechens fighting, let’s be honest they’re not contributing much other than propaganda
The Chechens are monsters who are one of the stars of this war..

Their competence of urban warfare are never to be denied, so ambushes and defensive methods do not work in guerrilla warfare with them. This is their main specialty even before their involvement in the Russian army.. Experience and continuous training were in their favor, not equipment or preparation. They are groups that depend on the capabilities, experience and competence of individuals more than the quality of equipment they Possess or their number..
 
Interview with Youssef Hindi

Ukraine is considered by a number of Israeli Jews as their property

Arthur Sapaudia: Dear Youssef, thank you for granting me this interview. When did you start to take an interest in the issues that concern you, that is to say, among others, Zionism, the clash of civilizations, Jewish messianism, secularism... What was your trigger?

Youssef Hindi:
There was no trigger. I have been interested in politics, history, sociology, anthropology, geopolitics and many other fields since adolescence. I made a name for myself with my first book, Occident et Islam – Tome 1: Sources et genèse messianiques du Sionisme (2015, ed. Sigest), which is the result of my research on the religious origins of Zionism whose official history traced its birth to the late 19th century in the mind of Herzl, a Jewish atheist. My research on the subject, started ten years ago, was motivated by historiographical shortcomings in the genealogy of Zionism. This is what led me to study Jewish messianism and Jewish mysticism (the Kabbalah) about ten years ago. This is how I discovered the origins of Zionism and the strategy of the clash of civilizations. At the same time, I opened other research projects and wrote nine books in total to date.

Who are your precursors in the fields mentioned and what books would you recommend reading in addition to yours?

On the messianic origins of Zionism and the strategy of the clash of civilizations, I am the first, to my knowledge, to have traced its genealogy, from the 13th century to the present day. But like any researcher, I am not starting from scratch. Authors have allowed me, by their contributions as much as by their shortcomings, to advance and direct my research. Among them is the historian Shlomo Sand who believed that Zionism was born in the English millenarian Protestant circles of the 17th century. It was my disagreement with him, upon reading his 2008 book, How the Jewish People Was Invented?, that prompted me to research the Jewish origins of Zionism. He argued that the Zionist project could not have been born in the Jewish tradition since the Talmud forbade the return of the Jewish people to the Holy Land. And he believed, like Thierry Meyssan after him, that the idea of repatriating the Jewish people to Palestine to hasten the coming of the Messiah was exclusively Protestant millenarian. My intuition told me that these Protestant millennials had been influenced by Jewish messianism. It was not difficult for me to demonstrate. But the most difficult thing was to discover how this messianic Zionist project had emerged in the Jewish world.

A few years later, I read the fascinating book by the great reporter Douglas Reed, The Zion Controversy, which he wrote in the 1950s. Douglas Reed saw that Zionism had its roots in the Jewish religion, but he could not demonstrate it. His mistake was to link Zionism to the Talmud, while the latter forbids the return of Jews to the Holy Land before the arrival of the Messiah of the Jews. In defense of Douglas Reed, he was not a research historian or specialist in Judaism, and had no knowledge of Kabbalah; his book is, as he wrote in conclusion, a testimony that future historians had to validate with evidence.

It was then that I began to study the history, concepts and evolution of Jewish mysticism (the Kabbalah) and messianism, because I sensed that it was in this current that I would find the origins of the zionist project. So I immersed myself in the books of Gershom Scholem which were very useful to me in understanding Kabbalah and messianism. But there again, Scholem did not link Zionism to Kabbalah and messianism. And I had to do more precise research on key periods and characters to resolve this “historical problem”.

It is very difficult for a neophyte to distinguish between Gnosis, Kabbalah, messianism, alchemy, magic... How do you find your way around and what would be their common basis?

Kabbalah was strongly influenced by Gnosticism which originated from beliefs coming from both ancient Persian religion [Mazdeism], Greek religion and certainly other beliefs from both the Mediterranean and India via Mesopotamia. Kabbalah is composed of several branches: apocalyptic, cosmology, angelology, demonology and magic. As for Jewish messianism, it has, over the centuries, been largely penetrated by the Kabbalah. But I strongly advise against venturing into the study of Kabbalah for those who do not have a solid theological foundation. They will get lost there.

Do you think what is happening currently in Ukraine is an integral part of active messianism?

As I explained recently1, it is first of all about the geopolitical confrontation between the United States and Russia. This is the old strategy of the Anglo-American thalassocratic power, one of the main objectives of which is to take control of Eurasia. A project that is naturally opposed by Russia, a tellurocratic power, threatened with destruction. But Jewish messianism is not far away. Ukraine is considered by a number of Israeli Jews as their property. Moreover, President Zelinski is himself a Jew, just like his master, the billionaire Igor Kolomoïski (holder of Ukrainian, Israeli and Cypriot nationalities) who financed the neo-Nazi battalions of Ukraine. Kolomoiski also lives in Israel.

In an article published in September 2015, I analyzed the Zionist strategy vis-à-vis Russia2, which was combined with US geostrategy. Israel, via the pro-Israeli lobby3, uses, in particular since the turning point of September 11, 2001, the United States and NATO as a tool for the destruction of Russia's historical allies in the Middle East, which leads to even greater animosity between Russians and Americans.

At the same time, the Zionist leaders are trying, through intermediaries, to negotiate with Russia so that it abandons its Syrian and Iranian allies. In July 2013, Prince Bandar, as a representative of Saudi Arabia (Israel's ally), met with Vladimir Putin during the Syrian crisis. During the talks, Bandar allegedly proposed an economic, oil and gas agreement to Vladimir Putin, in exchange for which he would have to let go of Iran, abandon President Assad and deliver Syria to terrorists4. At the time, I analyzed the fire lit a few months later in Ukraine as an American-Israeli response to the Russian refusal. Moreover, Israel was preparing to deliver weapons to Ukraine a month or two after the start of the civil war. Putin then warned the Jewish state.

1 https://strategika.fr/2022/02/26/le...tan-russie-conference-audio-de-youssef-hindi/
2 http://www.geopolintel.fr/article970.html
3 John J. Mearsheimer and Stephen M. Walt, The pro-Israel lobby and American foreign policy, La Découverte, 2007.
4 Al Manar, “What was not revealed about the stormy Bandar-Putin encounter”, August 21, 2013.
5 Sputnik, “Putin warns Israel against arms deliveries to Kyiv”, 18 April 2015.

https://sapaudia.org/2022/03/07/entretien-avec-youssef-hindi-03-22/
Youssef "Hindi".. it says it all..
First with KSA an ally of Usrael..
Second by failing to mention that Ukraine was the land of the first Jewish "kingdom"..
He has a lot to learn!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom