Russia-Ukraine War - News and Developments

[Ali_Baba]

Russia's 'broken arrow': Fears that nuclear missiles sank with Putin's flagship Moskva

Ukraine war: Fears Moskva was carrying nuclear weapons when it sank

The Moskva - a 600ft Russian warship that sank yesterday in the Black Sea - could have been carrying two nuclear warheads when it went down, experts and analysts have warned today.

www.dailymail.co.uk

• questions remain over the fate of Moskva's 510-strong crew, most of whom are unaccounted for

 

[Wood]

don't laugh at it , if the Russians media start to demand to act against civilian infrastructure , then in one week Russians public make such demands and i wonder what will remain of Ukraine after that .
its not a good situation at all

Russian media have been demanding for the destruction of Ukraine for a month now. I've been laughing at it every day.

Only thing Russia has not tried at this point to destroy civilian infrastructure is nuke and ballistic missiles. It is not like Russians have been soft. Just that it is all they are capable of.

 

[lightning F57]

The Russians have so far shown lack of organisation, clear objectives, lack of care and allot of incompetence. To lose a flagship is a big humiliation. Retailiating and hitting civilian sites will go and confirm that.

Putin big time underestimated the response to invading Ukraine. I thought the Russians were smarter than this. They seemed to be check mated on this chess board by Nato.

 

[Viet]

I think the Russian intelligence service was infiltrated or at least were not doing their work. But many say it was Putin who tied the military's hands. We may never know why Russians have been so sloppy in their conduct of this war. Perhaps they expected easy fight and quick departure of Zelensky and his regime. Nevertheless, they should've been cluster bombing on anything that moves from Poland, and other neighboring countries to Ukraine. Air, land, and sea blockade should have been the motto.

Putin is victim of his own propaganda. He lives in a echo chamber. For instance he believes Belarus will join the war. He believes Belarus would blockade western weapons delivery via Poland.

 

[Wood]

Hey buddy, how is Vlad doing? I here the russian ship was baptized yesterday in black sea for our future orthodox super empire under Putlers supreme rule

The poster ran away for a while after crying. Hope he will come back to cry for Vlad soon

 

[Hack-Hook]

Russian media have been demanding for the destruction of Ukraine for a month now. I've been laughing at it every day.

Only thing Russia has not tried at this point to destroy civilian infrastructure is nuke and ballistic missiles. It is not like Russians have been soft. Just that it is all they are capable of.

they nearly didn't touch electricity grid , the transportation network is intact , gas and energy network is fine , they didn't attacked Ukrainian political centers, in short there are many targets they can choose.
their strategic bombers didn't do any meaningful bombing

The Russians have so far shown lack of organisation, clear objectives, lack of care and allot of incompetence. To lose a flagship is a big humiliation. Retailiating and hitting civilian sites will go and confirm that.

Putin big time underestimated the response to invading Ukraine. I thought the Russians were smarter than this. They seemed to be check mated on this chess board by Nato.

if Russia destroy transportation network of Ukraine they can claim they attacked military object as its used to transport weapon into Ukraine.

 

[Wood]

they nearly didn't touch electricity grid , the transportation network is intact , gas and energy network is fine , they didn't attacked Ukrainian political centers, in short there are many targets they can choose.
their strategic bombers didn't do any meaningful bombing

Yes, why have they not? Perhaps they are not able to. Their Airforce is not even able to secure air supremacy in the war. I don't want to make the assumption that Russians are an invincible force anymore.

 

[Ali_Baba]

they nearly didn't touch electricity grid , the transportation network is intact , gas and energy network is fine , they didn't attacked Ukrainian political centers, in short there are many targets they can choose.
their strategic bombers didn't do any meaningful bombing


if Russia destroy transportation network of Ukraine they can claim they attacked military object as its used to transport weapon into Ukraine.

It is a war crime to attack civilian infrastructure ....

 

[bobo6661]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1514840372836454405

Yee do it

this one from my little city and there are hundreds of those around in poland

Time to get hammers ready

 

[Foinikas]

Cry more

Buddy,you've got issues.

 

[Hack-Hook]

It is a war crime to attack civilian infrastructure ....

not if they used for military purpose , isn't that USA, Nato and Israel always claim when they attack civilian infrastructure

Yes, why have they not? Perhaps they are not able to. Their Airforce is not even able to secure air supremacy in the war. I don't want to make the assumption that Russians are an invincible force anymore.

if you think they cant destroy bridge , and control center for Ukrainian transportation system think twice , if you think they cant hit any Ukrainian train think twice , if you think they cant hit any distribution and control center for Ukrainian power and energy grid please think twice . at the end if you think they cant flatten Odessa like what happened in Mariupol again think twice

 

[Wood]

you think they cant destroy bridge , and control center for Ukrainian transportation system think twice , if you think they cant hit any Ukrainian train think twice , if you think they cant hit any distribution and control center for Ukrainian power and energy grid please think twice . at the end if you think they cant flatten Odessa like what happened in Mariupol again think twice

Russians don't have enough ammo and man power to repeat Mariupol everywhere. I don't have to think twice

 

[Apollon]

not if they used for military purpose , isn't that USA, Nato and Israel always claim when they attack civilian infrastructure


if you think they cant destroy bridge , and control center for Ukrainian transportation system think twice , if you think they cant hit any Ukrainian train think twice , if you think they cant hit any distribution and control center for Ukrainian power and energy grid please think twice . at the end if you think they cant flatten Odessa like what happened in Mariupol again think twice

They cant flatten Odessa because they cant get equipment in range.

You talk like Russia is a competent military power. They are not. Their tech is rotten, rockets have a 60% fail rate. Their flagship was yesterday sunk by Ukraine. When has something like that happened since 1945?

 

[Ali_Baba]

Odessa is safe now - there is no way Russian can launch a sea invasion of Odessa or a land invasion. The sinking of the ship has had a very significant impact on the ability of the Russian Navy to operate and for it to even attempt "rethink" of a sea-based invasion of Odessa.

Of course - we will have additional sea based deterrents that the UK will deliver soon(if not already?! ).

The need of the hour is tanks, lots of new artillery, MLRS and UAVs ( lots and lots of UAV's ).

I am interested to see how the Switchblades get on!

 

[Ali_Baba]

Russia strikes Kyiv factory 'that made missile used to sink flagship Moskva'​

Russian air strike hits Ukrainian missile factory in Kyiv

The Kremlin said it hit the 'Vizar' plant which it claims manufactures anti-ship missiles after Ukraine claimed it had used a Neptune anti-ship missile to sink Russia's naval flagship the Moskva.

www.dailymail.co.uk

Very salty response by Russia to the sinking of the flagship of the black sea fleet by Ukraine.

So Russia is caught in its web of lies again....