What's new

Russia-Ukraine War - News and Developments

Status
Not open for further replies.
.
How can russia fight if so many generals are getting killed ? ... simple its full propaganda. If so many officers and generals had died then russia would have retreated by now.
As you can see its not fighting very effectively.


Enjoy!

An interesting take on things.
This very clearly shows you the dangers of extended drug use.
 
.

Enjoy!

An interesting take on things.

The clearest sign that there is an agenda is when the 'freedom' loving countries ban opposing views by declaring them as 'disinformation'.

I can understand Ukraine banning Russian media, but why is Western Europe banning it? Why is Australia banning it? Of course, there is ample historical evidence for the hypocrisy of these 'free speech' governments.

For all its faults, the US remains the country that is truest to the ideals of free speech.
 
.
there are other reasons why we aren't seeing any videos. they are probably classified.
Ukraine doesn't have any Intel restriction like the US forces, if javelin works they would have shown it as a good PR video.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ich
.

Peak: 543,000 (April 1969)[16]:

US military 1969: 3.46 million. So 1/7 of total forces was in Vietnam.

Russian commitment is a bit higher relative to its total strength. 200k out of 900k is in Ukraine. That's 1/5.
But Russia is Ukraine neighbor while US is 13,000 km away from Vietnam (Saigon-Los Angeles).
Putin can quickly send in 500,000 more troops.
How he will win the war with 230,000 men?
Ukraine can mobilize over one million men.
 
. . .
.
yet another bites the dust
4a26ce6ccd92ced949807aa2843398d8.gif
 
.
The clearest sign that there is an agenda is when the 'freedom' loving countries ban opposing views by declaring them as 'disinformation'.

I can understand Ukraine banning Russian media, but why is Western Europe banning it? Why is Australia banning it? Of course, there is ample historical evidence for the hypocrisy of these 'free speech' governments.

For all its faults, the US remains the country that is truest to the ideals of free speech.


I guess you think you will get a better deal in Russia :

 
.
Wow 2 years......That's actually quite generous. I will mark them off around 7-9 months, 1 year top if they squeeze every penny under the current economic situation. And that is if they have made some serious progress (again, like taking Mariupol) soon.

The issue here is resource wise, you are going to use double or triple of what you are going to use in battle, because training and equipping those troop would also take up resource, while guns and ammo or Personnel Protection equipment are easy, you can get it anywhere. (China, CAS or Belarus) but you don't just equip your soldier with guns and ammo and protection, which mean you need to somehow equip them with tank, artillery, infantry fighting vehicle and all the way going up to gunship and fighter aircraft, every lost have to be replaced, and you can only make a certain number every year, and I can tell you this, the Russia rate of losing their equipment is already over the rate they can replace for the entire year. And that is before their economy is being sanctioned.

The only logical and reasonable way is to repair the damage one and dip into the strategic stock (Funny thing, I read an article somewhere saying Lithuania offer Ukraine to repair some of their Captured Russian tank and put them back into service, free of charge). That is the only way to recover those losses. But then there is a limit for strategic reserve. Which mean they will run out. And that is why it is important to have an allied. If Ukrainian are able to fly F-16 or older F-15, US will probably offer them the one we have store in Davis Monthan Boneyard (that is why we have allied country come to the US to fly F-16 and F-15 with them)

On the other hand, Russian would not be able to dip into their strategic reserve indefinitely, so when that depleted (it will be depleted between 6 and 7 months with the current rate of loss) and that is the time either Russian allied help them and donate their strategic reserve to Russia or Russia would seriously having a hard time to project combat power.

So I would give them 7 to 9 months to 1 year top to do whatever they wanted to do in Ukraine, then they will need to talk about peace. Because there are no way they can sustain the war effort after that time limit.

This is if they will not switch to "eating grass" mode, NorKo style. My estimate is for mobilised military command economy.

They will certainly not be eating grass in 1 year, but the economy as a whole will be a writeoff, then they will start to scratch if to bet it all with total mobilisation.

I made corrections for the squeaky state of state of Russian material supply, but not for squeaky state of state apparatus.

Will the mafia state be able to provide the needed number of competent military economic administrators, given they never held civil defence drills for that like China does? Or it will only worsen off the rout, and embezzlement?
 
.
I am not referring to far-right or left I am strictly referring to Nazis, Look up the definition of Nazis, and the fact that Russkies supported the Nazis to further their agenda whatever that may be do not justify Nazism, two wrongs does not make it right.

The west is arming Nazis in Ukraine because they are serving their interests there is an encyclopaedia on Ukrainian Nazis and wests double standards.

Below is just the tip of the iceberg.


Significant effort has gone into such propaganda, and it is clearly backed by the Ukrainian government, which is attempting to demonstrate that killing people is “cool” and “fun,” as the leader of the Neo-Nazi group C14 Yevhen Karas told his audience at a political seminar named after the Ukrainian Nazi-collaborator Stepan Bandera in early February. Karas has also bluntly stated that it is precisely because neo-Nazis like him love killing Russians that the West supplies them with weapons.
lol, i love how you dodge my point on how Azov being Neo Nazi but still had a Jewish commander, it's like having a catholic priest as a Muslim Imam....

Anyway, My point were there, and anything I say is just going to repeating it. So I am wrapping up and moving on. I mean at the end of the day, you can say anything you want, Zelenskyy government is neo Nazi, or the west are being hypocrite. Like Zelensyy said, "if defending my country is neo nazi, then I guess we all are neo nazi" Set aside how funny is this when a jewish person having relative lost their live during the Holocaust, he was right, it changes nothing on the ground, would Ukrainian are gonna fight less hard because the Russian label them Neo Nazi? Or do you suggest that the Ukrainian will simply welcoming the Russian because the Russian said they are neo Nazi? Or the west will simply stopped supplying weapon to Ukraine to fuc k Russian over because people like you call them "Hypocrite"?

No, so at the end of the day, it does not really matter, so, well, you are free to think whatever you want, but since that would not change the ground calculus one bit, I have no interest in keep going on arguing with you.

This is if they will not switch to "eating grass" mode, NorKo style. My estimate is for mobilised military command economy.

They will certainly not be eating grass in 1 year, but the economy as a whole will be a writeoff, then they will start to scratch if to bet it all with total mobilisation.

I made corrections for the squeaky state of state of Russian material supply, but not for squeaky state of state apparatus.

Will the mafia state be able to provide the needed number of competent military economic administrators, given they never held civil defence drills for that like China does? Or it will only worsen off the rout, and embezzlement?
Well, if they want to have a general mobilisation, they would need to do it now.

The problem is not whether or not hey will b eating grass, but whether will they come to the battlefield in donkey.

The Russian is already dipping into their strategic reserve of equipment, dusting out old tank that wasn't used in 20 or 30 years, and at this rate, they are going to dust out those T-34 from WW2 museum if they keep on the loss. And those stuff cannot be replace in a short run, which mean even if they can mobilise enough troop, it does not work if all they get is an Ak-47 and a few hundred rounds of ammo in the zone.

Soon, NATO, will provide Ukraine with excessive stock of just about everything, and from the rate it is going, the equipment are going to last longer with Ukraine than Russia, that is why they will get stuck in about 7 to 9 months, again 1 year if they watch their wallet.
 
Last edited:
.
Mr.
If i beleave your all propaganda 100% right, then i have to bealeve that there is no war in Ukraine, only peace peace and 100% western Peace and Democracy all over Ukraine
because few days ago you told Russian 10000, 20000,40000 like this soldire die, so i alrady have to bealeave Russian Military already surrender to Ucraine.

So finally i tell you, if Israeli bomb in Gaza is good bomb, then Russian bomb in Ukraine must Good bomb.

so test your own peace and democracy.
 
.
Seems like Russian offensive is stalled.


Screenshot_20220325-101829_Chrome.jpg
 
.
Ukraine doesn't have any Intel restriction like the US forces, if javelin works they would have shown it as a good PR video.
Oh, how do you know that? Javelin does not need PR. Its the only weapons system of its kind, a non wire guided fire and forget vertical attack. Most countries would not be abele to get one even if they wanted it because of export restrictions.

I think there is no video of it because of the way its used. They dont want to reveal how they are using it or its full capabilities.
 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom