Viet
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Jun 18, 2012
- Messages
- 29,950
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
They can be happy in gulag.
Think he's gone. They reused some of the footage.
If Stalin still there Shoigu will stand before execution commando.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They can be happy in gulag.
Think he's gone. They reused some of the footage.
Well as you said they tried to go quick, but didn't expect encountering hard Ukrainian resistance.
Oh thats for sure. Ukrainians will see to that as well.
Russia produces 11 million barrels oil per day. Putin gives 3 million barrels to the army, the rest is used domestically or sold to foreigners.Well as you said they tried to go quick, but didn't expect encountering hard Ukrainian resistance.
Oh thats for sure. Ukrainians will see to that as well.
First of all size DID matter.Their size is irrelevant and there are other Nazi groups too apart from Azov, the fact that they are labeled good Nazis because they serve your interest does not negate the fact that they are nazis, there are tons of documentaries on the Ukrainian nazis and I hope you do understand the definition of a nazi.
Well that is double standard then, You ignore the fact that they are nazis, Why are German Nazis bad boys when their motives and actions were not very different from the Ukrainian Nazis. No matter what spin you give a Nazi is a Nazi PEROID...First of all size DID matter.
Second of all, Azov is what we will call a fringe group, they are most definitely a right wing group but it mostly did not count as Neo Nazi, calling them Neo Nazi is like calling Proud Boy neo Nazi. Again, 30% of Azov Battalion is Jewish and some Azov group commander is Jewish.
Thirdly, when your country is under attack, you tend to ignore what those group were for originally, as I said before OUN was banned from forming militia and banned from running for government, now they can form local militia. Were this because of Ukrainian "Pro-NazI" or were this because of Russia pushing Ukraine to the limit?
First of all, you are confused with the term "Far Right" to "Nazism". Far Right is "Nationalist" movement, which is based upon Authoritarianism, it's a nativism movement, it have nothing to do with Nazism or Neo Nazism. Nazism and Neo Nazism is the revival of Nazism movement, which is a eugenic base, where they were anti-Semitism, anti-Communism and anti-Liberal Democracy.Well that is double standard then, You ignore the fact that they are nazis, Why are German Nazis bad boys when their motives and actions were not very different from the Ukrainian Nazis. No matter what spin you give a Nazi is a Nazi PEROID...
First of all, you are confused with the term "Far Right" to "Nazism". Far Right is "Nationalist" movement, which is based upon Authoritarianism, it's a nativism movement, it have nothing to do with Nazism or Neo Nazism. Nazism and Neo Nazism is the revival of Nazism movement, which is a eugenic base, where they were anti-Semitism, anti-Communism and anti-Liberal Democracy.
A group can be Far Right, but not Neo Nazi, but you cannot be a Neo Nazi without being in the far right movement.
In this term, many would have purported that Azov is a Far Right movement, does that mean there are neo-nazi member in it? Sure, as I said, Neo Nazi is a subset of Far Right movement, but for an organisation to be Neo Nazism, that was based in Eugenic, which mean by definition, they are White Supremist. And that is one core ideology you cannot negotiate to be a Neo Nazi organisation.
So, no, you cannot be a Neo Nazi organisation to have Jewish member in it, let alone having a Jewish member lead the organisation. Saying that is like saying it's okay for Buddhism to preach Christianity and believe in Jesus is the real god. I mean, individual personnel can change faith, but once that requirement of faith is change, it also would have changed the organisation. A Buddhist temple that purport Jesus is the real god is then by definition, no longer a Buddhist Temple.
And second of all, Neo Nazism exist in every country, so by that definition, every country would have so called "good nazi, bad nazi" Russia too. Which render the talk moot to begin with.
How Putin cultivated homegrown neo-Nazis for his own ends
While Russian President Vladimir Putin has made the absurd claim that he is waging war to "de-Nazify" Ukraine, his regime has a long record of collaboration with far-right extremists, writes Robert Horvath.www.abc.net.au
I think you are confusing yourself there. But dot worry, you will figure it out.Ok not taking sides but reality is,
Russia cant stop weapons coming into ukraine to be use against them
Russia hasnt achieved full air superiority
Why russia is using limited force then the one they project to whole world ?
But then,
If russian forces are so weak and losing and losing then its great opportunity for nato to intervene as ukraine alone according to their vigorous claim are beating hell out of russians. But nato is not intervening does it mean nato and ukraine is lying about russian losses ?
See most of russian weapons are useless according to ukraine and west then what is stopping them ?
Russia has no guts if nato enters ukraine and will use nuclear bombs in ukraine cause nuclear missiles are last resort or maybe not. But then again if russia uses nukes means they admit conventionally they are really weak
Oh come on. you think 100,000 civilians have any chance against 10,000 troops? or even 5,000 troops. Civilians have no chance. even a 1,000 troops could kill 100,000 civilians.I don't think Putin have any meaningful number of troop. In Kherson
Just simple math really. 200,000 troop in country, in 3 to 4 separate ingression. Even if we split them equally, you are looking at 50,000 troop each side (which I doubt they are doing them equally) and majority of troop in the southern Flank are undoubtedly be in MAriupol right now, which mean at most 10000 troop is left in Kherson, may be less.
10000 troop against 100,000 population? With a threat of conventional force attack? Like the old saying goes, "I hope you bring enough bullet, son"
Mr.
US had about 600K soldiers in Vietnam excluding the South Vietnamese forces. So your statement is a little bit out.
Here are some interesting stats about Vietnam war:-