What's new

Russia-Ukraine War - News and Developments

Status
Not open for further replies.
Two statements are enough to raise oil prices..
First Putin says exports to Europe have been reduced
The second is kSA, with a passing statement that the facilities need a month to return to full production as a result of the Houthi attacks..

And there is a 3rd statement:

Quoted by Pavel Sorokin, Deputy Minister of Energy of Russia.. that Russian and Kazakh oil exports through the Caspian Sea Pipeline Consortium could drop by as much as 1 million barrels of oil per day due to storm-damaged sidewalks..The oil company quoted the Deputy Minister of Energy of Russia saying that the aforementioned pipeline, which ships and transports about 1.2 million barrels per day or 1.2% of global oil demand will be out of order until about two months of repair work..

After this statement, we can easily see prices above $180 a barrel..
 
Last edited:
Well as you said they tried to go quick, but didn't expect encountering hard Ukrainian resistance.


Oh thats for sure. Ukrainians will see to that as well.

Have you not seen enough, Crimea gone, NATO gone, DPR and the LPR gone... LOL.. wonder what else....
 
Well as you said they tried to go quick, but didn't expect encountering hard Ukrainian resistance.


Oh thats for sure. Ukrainians will see to that as well.
Russia produces 11 million barrels oil per day. Putin gives 3 million barrels to the army, the rest is used domestically or sold to foreigners.
So the invasion army should have oil.

The problem is logistics.

They never imagine to have a war of attrition.
Russia is finished.
 
Their size is irrelevant and there are other Nazi groups too apart from Azov, the fact that they are labeled good Nazis because they serve your interest does not negate the fact that they are nazis, there are tons of documentaries on the Ukrainian nazis and I hope you do understand the definition of a nazi.
First of all size DID matter.

Second of all, Azov is what we will call a fringe group, they are most definitely a right wing group but it mostly did not count as Neo Nazi, calling them Neo Nazi is like calling Proud Boy neo Nazi. Again, 30% of Azov Battalion is Jewish and some Azov group commander is Jewish.

Thirdly, when your country is under attack, you tend to ignore what those group were for originally, as I said before OUN was banned from forming militia and banned from running for government, now they can form local militia. Were this because of Ukrainian "Pro-NazI" or were this because of Russia pushing Ukraine to the limit?
 
First of all size DID matter.

Second of all, Azov is what we will call a fringe group, they are most definitely a right wing group but it mostly did not count as Neo Nazi, calling them Neo Nazi is like calling Proud Boy neo Nazi. Again, 30% of Azov Battalion is Jewish and some Azov group commander is Jewish.

Thirdly, when your country is under attack, you tend to ignore what those group were for originally, as I said before OUN was banned from forming militia and banned from running for government, now they can form local militia. Were this because of Ukrainian "Pro-NazI" or were this because of Russia pushing Ukraine to the limit?
Well that is double standard then, You ignore the fact that they are nazis, Why are German Nazis bad boys when their motives and actions were not very different from the Ukrainian Nazis. No matter what spin you give a Nazi is a Nazi PEROID...
 
Well that is double standard then, You ignore the fact that they are nazis, Why are German Nazis bad boys when their motives and actions were not very different from the Ukrainian Nazis. No matter what spin you give a Nazi is a Nazi PEROID...
First of all, you are confused with the term "Far Right" to "Nazism". Far Right is "Nationalist" movement, which is based upon Authoritarianism, it's a nativism movement, it have nothing to do with Nazism or Neo Nazism. Nazism and Neo Nazism is the revival of Nazism movement, which is a eugenic base, where they were anti-Semitism, anti-Communism and anti-Liberal Democracy.

A group can be Far Right, but not Neo Nazi, but you cannot be a Neo Nazi without being in the far right movement.

In this term, many would have purported that Azov is a Far Right movement, does that mean there are neo-nazi member in it? Sure, as I said, Neo Nazi is a subset of Far Right movement, but for an organisation to be Neo Nazism, that was based in Eugenic, which mean by definition, they are White Supremist. And that is one core ideology you cannot negotiate to be a Neo Nazi organisation.

So, no, you cannot be a Neo Nazi organisation to have Jewish member in it, let alone having a Jewish member lead the organisation. Saying that is like saying it's okay for Buddhism to preach Christianity and believe in Jesus is the real god. I mean, individual personnel can change faith, but once that requirement of faith is change, it also would have changed the organisation. A Buddhist temple that purport Jesus is the real god is then by definition, no longer a Buddhist Temple.

And second of all, Neo Nazism exist in every country, so by that definition, every country would have so called "good nazi, bad nazi" Russia too. Which render the talk moot to begin with.

 
First of all, you are confused with the term "Far Right" to "Nazism". Far Right is "Nationalist" movement, which is based upon Authoritarianism, it's a nativism movement, it have nothing to do with Nazism or Neo Nazism. Nazism and Neo Nazism is the revival of Nazism movement, which is a eugenic base, where they were anti-Semitism, anti-Communism and anti-Liberal Democracy.

A group can be Far Right, but not Neo Nazi, but you cannot be a Neo Nazi without being in the far right movement.

In this term, many would have purported that Azov is a Far Right movement, does that mean there are neo-nazi member in it? Sure, as I said, Neo Nazi is a subset of Far Right movement, but for an organisation to be Neo Nazism, that was based in Eugenic, which mean by definition, they are White Supremist. And that is one core ideology you cannot negotiate to be a Neo Nazi organisation.

So, no, you cannot be a Neo Nazi organisation to have Jewish member in it, let alone having a Jewish member lead the organisation. Saying that is like saying it's okay for Buddhism to preach Christianity and believe in Jesus is the real god. I mean, individual personnel can change faith, but once that requirement of faith is change, it also would have changed the organisation. A Buddhist temple that purport Jesus is the real god is then by definition, no longer a Buddhist Temple.

And second of all, Neo Nazism exist in every country, so by that definition, every country would have so called "good nazi, bad nazi" Russia too. Which render the talk moot to begin with.


I am not referring to far-right or left I am strictly referring to Nazis, Look up the definition of Nazis, and the fact that Russkies supported the Nazis to further their agenda whatever that may be do not justify Nazism, two wrongs does not make it right.

The west is arming Nazis in Ukraine because they are serving their interests there is an encyclopaedia on Ukrainian Nazis and wests double standards.

Below is just the tip of the iceberg.


Significant effort has gone into such propaganda, and it is clearly backed by the Ukrainian government, which is attempting to demonstrate that killing people is “cool” and “fun,” as the leader of the Neo-Nazi group C14 Yevhen Karas told his audience at a political seminar named after the Ukrainian Nazi-collaborator Stepan Bandera in early February. Karas has also bluntly stated that it is precisely because neo-Nazis like him love killing Russians that the West supplies them with weapons.
 
Ok not taking sides but reality is,

Russia cant stop weapons coming into ukraine to be use against them

Russia hasnt achieved full air superiority

Why russia is using limited force then the one they project to whole world ?

But then,

If russian forces are so weak and losing and losing then its great opportunity for nato to intervene as ukraine alone according to their vigorous claim are beating hell out of russians. But nato is not intervening does it mean nato and ukraine is lying about russian losses ?

See most of russian weapons are useless according to ukraine and west then what is stopping them ?

Russia has no guts if nato enters ukraine and will use nuclear bombs in ukraine cause nuclear missiles are last resort or maybe not. But then again if russia uses nukes means they admit conventionally they are really weak 🤔
I think you are confusing yourself there. But dot worry, you will figure it out.

Russia is stronger and is destroying and occupying the country slowly. NATO is supporting Ukraine and making russia pay an enormous price. Perhaps preventing russia from conquering Ukraine.

NATO is scared a direct intervention will provoke a nuclear war.

We would all like for NATO to intervene and bomb the Russians right out of there, but this cant be done because of Russian nukes. Its not that complicated a scenario.

I don't think Putin have any meaningful number of troop. In Kherson

Just simple math really. 200,000 troop in country, in 3 to 4 separate ingression. Even if we split them equally, you are looking at 50,000 troop each side (which I doubt they are doing them equally) and majority of troop in the southern Flank are undoubtedly be in MAriupol right now, which mean at most 10000 troop is left in Kherson, may be less.

10000 troop against 100,000 population? With a threat of conventional force attack? Like the old saying goes, "I hope you bring enough bullet, son"
Oh come on. you think 100,000 civilians have any chance against 10,000 troops? or even 5,000 troops. Civilians have no chance. even a 1,000 troops could kill 100,000 civilians.
 
Mr.
If i beleave your all propaganda 100% right, then i have to bealeve that there is no war in Ukraine, only peace peace and 100% western Peace and Democracy all over Ukraine
because few days ago you told Russian 10000, 20000,40000 like this soldire die, so i alrady have to bealeave Russian Military already surrender to Ucraine.

So finally i tell you, if Israeli bomb in Gaza is good bomb, then Russian bomb in Ukraine must Good bomb.

so test your own peace and democracy.
 
How can russia fight if so many generals are getting killed ? ... simple its full propaganda. If so many officers and generals had died then russia would have retreated by now.
 
US had about 600K soldiers in Vietnam excluding the South Vietnamese forces. So your statement is a little bit out.
Here are some interesting stats about Vietnam war:-


Peak: 543,000 (April 1969)[16]:

US military 1969: 3.46 million. So 1/7 of total forces was in Vietnam.

Russian commitment is a bit higher relative to its total strength. 200k out of 900k is in Ukraine. That's 1/5.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom