Windjammer
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 9, 2009
- Messages
- 41,319
- Reaction score
- 181
- Country
- Location
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
First of all, I COMPLETELY agree with what you said, Officer should NEVER be sitting in the office while people under his command fighting.well soldier boy. I dont know what army you have served in. But there are very few soldiers who enjoy some officer sitting comfortably behind his desk and send them on dangerous missions.
infact many over ambitious american field seargants were "fragged" in vietnam . (had a grenade thrown into their tent at night) from disgruntled soldiers who didnt want to put their lives on the line on dangerous missions to advance that guys career. Let alone desk jockeys sitting in air conditioned rooms..
It is well documented that Russian officers are taking a front line role. regardless of your opinion of the matter. I can assure you with 100% certainty that the fatalities are not because ukies overran russian positions and killed the general in his office. that is laughable.
The reason the US can get away with it. Is because they sit an ocean away. with mexico/canada being their border neighbours. And they can afford to pick and choose their battles at the exact time they want. And overwhelm a weak enemy with superior resources.
First of all, I COMPLETELY agree with what you said, Officer should NEVER be sitting in the office while people under his command fighting.
But then you are not talking about a company grade officer or even NCO (in this case, sergeant you mentioned) you are talking about a FLAG OFFICER, now, I don't know what you know about military, and I am not in a mood or at all interested in argue with your "version" of reality. I mean, if you think losing "Generals" (Bear in mind, multiple, with s) is normal, well, I can only say you should not be in the military at all.
I mean, do you have enough general to accompanied every company in operation? I mean, maybe for you, everyone is a general, but for most military, it's 1 general to roughly 10,000 troop. So if you have any sense of how military work, you would know what you are saying is impossible,
But as I said, if you want to live in your "version" of reality, I don't really mind, just don't call me on it, I have no interest in discussing with you what you think and what we really do.
Russia have a bigger force than we do, and we don't use military personnel for civilian work (ie anything above JCS is civilian while it would be held by a general in similar posting in Russia, ie all the secretary, under secretary, all the homeland security council member, national security council member)Russia has a lot of generals.
In US I know you legislatively limited their number to 231
Russia has more than double of that
Find myself in agreement with Meirsheimer. My only objection would be the use of the "West". It seems that France, Germany and other European countries had enough sense to foresee what further eastward expansion would entail. It's the reckless and arrogant push from the US that caused this mess. Merkel, Sarkozy knew European history and the balance of power order.