What's new

Russia-Ukraine War - News and Developments PART 2

Russia will not run out of Russians for a very long time. Similarly, they can produce arms like sewage pipe mortars for a very long time with their material capacity.

They will break far sooner than they will become materially unable to field extra forces.
Putin brags Russia produces more missiles than all other combined. Interesting words coming from a someone’s mouth, who claims Ukraine is a security threat to Russia. A threat by Ukraine that’s why he starts the war.
Difficult to assess Russia war machine, how much and how fast they can produce. We will see in their offensives against Ukraine defense. The next months will decide. Russia industrial capacity is just a fraction of USSR. Putin hasn’t done much to improve it during his 20y in power.
Lack of oil probably not. Russia oil production is 10-11 million barrels per day. The military machine needs 1-2 million barrels per day. So there are lots of rooms to fill diesel into more tanks.
 
Me knew what is neutrality, you knew what is it, many other people also knew what is it. But when you discuss it in term of legality, it's definition is not every person consider it so.
And you must say that to lawyer and countries who wrote those laws and opened those loopholes and intentionally left clauses there in hope of using it themselves later, forgetting that others also can use them.

And it's Legality and power of ICJ that I'm talking about not Geneva convections
Neutrality means do nothing. You can opine, but that is all you can do. If it is proven that Iran sold weapons to Russia, Iran is no longer a neutral state. Whether Iran is a signatory to the Geneva Convention and the International Court of Justice is irrelevant.
 
Its astonishing to see the world hasnt given Ukraine the best of weaponry that the world itself uses its high time armed gunship helicopters are given to Ukraine to ward off and capture all russian establishment occupied Ukrainian territories otherwise all hue and cry for Ukraine is all drama by nato and its allies
 
Neutrality means do nothing. You can opine, but that is all you can do. If it is proven that Iran sold weapons to Russia, Iran is no longer a neutral state. Whether Iran is a signatory to the Geneva Convention and the International Court of Justice is irrelevant.
when you talk in context of international relation , you must look at the definition in the international laws and contracts . not Webster Dictionary.
ICJ definition is not international law , its definition maybe applied to the country that recognize it as there is international contracts that bind them to its ruling but the majority of the countries in the world don't recognize its authority so the definition used by it is not applicable for the majority of the world.
 
Come show your support to our beloved member @Yongpeng Sun-Tastaufen

 
Its astonishing to see the world hasnt given Ukraine the best of weaponry that the world itself uses its high time armed gunship helicopters are given to Ukraine to ward off and capture all russian establishment occupied Ukrainian territories otherwise all hue and cry for Ukraine is all drama by nato and its allies
Nato using Ukraine, everyone knows it
 
Nato using Ukraine, everyone knows it
For that to be true, NATO need to control Russia too.....

This will not happen if Russia did not sent its troop to Ukraine. So it's kind of hard to say NATO are using Ukraine. At best it's a incident that pitch two side into the same side of the coin in this case it benefit NATO,

On the other hand, if your neighbor come to your home and demolish it and then rape your family, what do you suggest the Ukrainian to do?
 
Its astonishing to see the world hasnt given Ukraine the best of weaponry that the world itself uses its high time armed gunship helicopters are given to Ukraine to ward off and capture all russian establishment occupied Ukrainian territories otherwise all hue and cry for Ukraine is all drama by nato and its allies
Europe has much demilitarized thus can’t give much, least best weapons to Ukraine because Europe needs for self defense. Even basic things as tanks or artillery. Germany needs 2 years to restock leopards 2 panzers which are given to Ukraine. Only the US has the reserves.
 
For that to be true, NATO need to control Russia too.....

This will not happen if Russia did not sent its troop to Ukraine. So it's kind of hard to say NATO are using Ukraine. At best it's a incident that pitch two side into the same side of the coin in this case it benefit NATO,

On the other hand, if your neighbor come to your home and demolish it and then rape your family, what do you suggest the Ukrainian to do?
Well, such people like him believe the world is so: you will do like the Christ believers do. If you are slapped at one side of the face then surrender the other side of face to the attacker.

If you refuse to do that or you call the police, they will accuse you are a slave to the police.

Calling him a brainwashed idiot is understatement.

Also, Putin, Larov, Peskow, Medwedev are such people.
 
Maybe, but most likely they will work with concentrate 155 fire and then role thru and advance,

It cannot beat the flexibility of air power tho, if they were to do it, they would probably do it in a smaller scale.




Yeah, part will always be the issue. I don't know how are they going to do it, they need a spare parts warehouse, but it's hard to make one if you are just talking about 31 tanks.

Shipping them all the way from California probably is not a feasible option.
Can always ask Amazon Prime shipping. Even if 31 tanks, they can help with break throughs and let Ukrainians send in their own non Western tanks take over afterwards after hours of combat operations by the Abrams and others or rotate them for rest and repair.

Only Ukrainians don't know. Ukraine is only suffering at the hands of Nato and Russia.
Just accept the fact that the Ukrainians know (thanks to the Russians and their openly public intent) that Putin wants to wipe them out.

Nato using Ukraine, everyone knows it
Russia needs to get out of Ukraine to get out of the trap. They fell for it by invading it. It was all part of NATO's plan.

Iran did not supply weapons to Russia after 20 February 2022. Therefore Kiev's official claim to have conducted a failed quadcopter strike on a factory in Esfahan equals military aggression. Iran is now in her internationally guaranteed right to retaliate as massively as she wishes, against Ukrainian armed forces.

The rest of the metaphorical rhetoric quoted above amounts to para-logical wordplay.
LOL! Iran did supply it. Even your government said so after their rubbish attempt to deny it in the first place then realize there was no point and admitted it. And before that they try to claim they supply those Shaheds before the war started. We know its all BS.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom