What's new

Russia-Ukraine War - News and Developments PART 2

.

The occupiers added another challenge - in the occupied territory. Virtually, they are dismantling the entire healthcare system there. The occupiers have decided to close medical institutions in the cities, take away equipment, ambulances - just everything... They put pressure on the doctors who still remained in the occupied areas for them to move to the territory of Russia.

Shameful!
 
.
It is not an UCAV if you have to have line of sight.
It is an armed RC-model.
Leonardos Fighting Vehicle predated the 18th century.
whatever, 1984 dude if you want to see what you fire at , you needed the line of sight, unless , you put a tv station in the uav
 
.
I thought you said their food will go bad because their freezer won't work lol
You are answering a dude who said "Homeless died because of hygiene problem" not because it's sleeping rough and there is no shelter in place for exposure.

I guess either he is right and aide agency around the world should start handing out antibiotic instead of blanket or that dude know nothing about sleeping rough outside @ 4C (which is way higher than normal Ukraine winter by the way)

lol, I had my smoothies speck out when I read his response....
 
.
Where to get millions of soldiers? Putin struggles to recruit 300,000 men. The only option: he stops his self invented military ops shit, calling an all-out war, but he must explain to millions of mothers why he sends them to die in foreign countries.
you compare him to Stalin , I assure you Stalin did not have problem finding 3 million soldier , just sent 30000 draft dodger to Siberia with their family and the next week he had 5 million volunteer .
 
. .
It is not an UCAV if you have to have line of sight.
It is an armed RC-model.
Leonardos Fighting Vehicle predated the 18th century.
I have been observing this debate about iran being one of first. Well, before that I want to convey people that ucav means an unmanned vehicle with combat capabilities and it does not mean it is NLOS or in LOS sight. For the time of 80s fighting against iraq it should be effective as that time AD sys must have had hard time targetting them when we look at modern sys having difficulty there is no chance 80s sys have had better performance.

Armed rc model is unmanned vehicle please consider that in mind and if we debate on that then german nazis fielded goliath with explosive suicidal concept. So yes, nazis were first to field unmanned vehicle.

Siege of venice in 19th century was recorded case.

Lee de forest was first to bring concept in 1940 from USA to introduce radio guidance and tv guidance to control vehicle systems.

V1 was first ucav. Yes, cruise missile are first ucavs there were prototypes to use radio control as they can change trajectory but nazi military wanted to use for terror instead of precision bombing which would have had terrifying results. It was not wise or dumb decision it was just that they couldnt understand at full in beginning. This bombs concept was introduced in 1935.

So you can say iran was first to field in middle east with proper guidance to guide the aircraft.
 
.
you compare him to Stalin , I assure you Stalin did not have problem finding 3 million soldier , just sent 30000 draft dodger to Siberia with their family and the next week he had 5 million volunteer .
You don’t see the differences?
Stalin ruled an empire USSR with allies.
Putin rules a poor Russia fully addicted to oil and gas. No allies, ok accept Iran.
The Red army was famous and successful.
The Russia army sucks.

Putin wants to be Stalin, but I believe he has a problem.
 
.
whatever, 1984 dude if you want to see what you fire at , you needed the line of sight, unless , you put a tv station in the uav
Television guidance has been available since the 1960s.
Without a TV camera you cannot really aim, and are not much better than the Civil War balloons.

The fact is that Iran designs based on western ideas and western components, and have very little to brag about.

I have been observing this debate about iran being one of first. Well, before that I want to convey people that ucav means an unmanned vehicle with combat capabilities and it does not mean it is NLOS or in LOS sight. For the time of 80s fighting against iraq it should be effective as that time AD sys must have had hard time targetting them when we look at modern sys having difficulty there is no chance 80s sys have had better performance.

Armed rc model is unmanned vehicle please consider that in mind and if we debate on that then german nazis fielded goliath with explosive suicidal concept. So yes, nazis were first to field unmanned vehicle.

Siege of venice in 19th century was recorded case.

Lee de forest was first to bring concept in 1940 from USA to introduce radio guidance and tv guidance to control vehicle systems.

V1 was first ucav. Yes, cruise missile are first ucavs there were prototypes to use radio control as they can change trajectory but nazi military wanted to use for terror instead of precision bombing which would have had terrifying results. It was not wise or dumb decision it was just that they couldnt understand at full in beginning. This bombs concept was introduced in 1935.

So you can say iran was first to field in middle east with proper guidance to guide the aircraft.
You can say that Iran was the first country to have an UCAV designed in Iran and used by Iranian forces in a war between Iraq and Iran.
Congratulations Iran.
 
.
You don’t see the differences?
Stalin ruled an empire USSR with allies.
Putin rules a poor Russia fully addicted to oil and gas. No allies, ok accept Iran.
The Red army was famous and successful.
The Russia army sucks.

Putin wants to be Stalin, but I believe he has a problem.
not important , the fact that you knew you and your family will disappear without any name of you mentioned if you didn't willingly sign yourself and your two year old child was incentive enough to go to nearest army recruitment center as soon as you saw they are talking about the possibility of mobilization

Without a TV camera you cannot really aim, and are not much better than the Civil War balloons.
ww1 and ww2 bombers
The fact is that Iran designs based on western ideas and western components, and have very little to brag about.
let not go into it , its not the place for that , if you want you can open a thread about it and tag me.
 
. . .
.
Dude, it's you say Ukrainian will freeze to death with no electricity and no heat. So how food will go bad if people will freeze to death? Which mean either people freeze to death in above zero temperature, or food go bad quick in subzero temperature...It can't both be true

Do you really have a brain and use it before you say stuff? Or it's just a verbal diarrhea for you? You just puke whatever word out??

Don't answer me tho, as I don't speak Idiots.

You seem to be getting really frustrated my good general. I know man. I totally know if they had only listened to you things would have ended differently

Lmao

Weapons grade copium right here 🤣🤣

Mr pdf thinkthank. Want to put a wager on?

You say Russia will accept west terms that are tantamount to an unconditional surrender

While im looking at enormous pain and territory loss for the ukies. In 6 months whoever is wrong deletes their account?

Want to put your money where your mouth is? Or you just coping/trolling?
 
.
Where to get millions of soldiers? Putin struggles to recruit 300,000 men. The only option: he stops his self invented military ops shit, calling an all-out war, but he must explain to millions of mothers why he sends them to die in foreign countries.

These conscripts are not reinforcements. They are meat Shields for the trained soldiers, and they know it. Classic Russian doctrine.
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom