Hassan Al-Somal
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2015
- Messages
- 6,825
- Reaction score
- -37
- Country
- Location
Basically each side is preparing for deploying nuclear weapons.
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The occupiers added another challenge - in the occupied territory. Virtually, they are dismantling the entire healthcare system there. The occupiers have decided to close medical institutions in the cities, take away equipment, ambulances - just everything... They put pressure on the doctors who still remained in the occupied areas for them to move to the territory of Russia.
whatever, 1984 dude if you want to see what you fire at , you needed the line of sight, unless , you put a tv station in the uavIt is not an UCAV if you have to have line of sight.
It is an armed RC-model.
Leonardos Fighting Vehicle predated the 18th century.
You are answering a dude who said "Homeless died because of hygiene problem" not because it's sleeping rough and there is no shelter in place for exposure.I thought you said their food will go bad because their freezer won't work lol
you compare him to Stalin , I assure you Stalin did not have problem finding 3 million soldier , just sent 30000 draft dodger to Siberia with their family and the next week he had 5 million volunteer .Where to get millions of soldiers? Putin struggles to recruit 300,000 men. The only option: he stops his self invented military ops shit, calling an all-out war, but he must explain to millions of mothers why he sends them to die in foreign countries.
I have been observing this debate about iran being one of first. Well, before that I want to convey people that ucav means an unmanned vehicle with combat capabilities and it does not mean it is NLOS or in LOS sight. For the time of 80s fighting against iraq it should be effective as that time AD sys must have had hard time targetting them when we look at modern sys having difficulty there is no chance 80s sys have had better performance.It is not an UCAV if you have to have line of sight.
It is an armed RC-model.
Leonardos Fighting Vehicle predated the 18th century.
You don’t see the differences?you compare him to Stalin , I assure you Stalin did not have problem finding 3 million soldier , just sent 30000 draft dodger to Siberia with their family and the next week he had 5 million volunteer .
Television guidance has been available since the 1960s.whatever, 1984 dude if you want to see what you fire at , you needed the line of sight, unless , you put a tv station in the uav
You can say that Iran was the first country to have an UCAV designed in Iran and used by Iranian forces in a war between Iraq and Iran.I have been observing this debate about iran being one of first. Well, before that I want to convey people that ucav means an unmanned vehicle with combat capabilities and it does not mean it is NLOS or in LOS sight. For the time of 80s fighting against iraq it should be effective as that time AD sys must have had hard time targetting them when we look at modern sys having difficulty there is no chance 80s sys have had better performance.
Armed rc model is unmanned vehicle please consider that in mind and if we debate on that then german nazis fielded goliath with explosive suicidal concept. So yes, nazis were first to field unmanned vehicle.
Siege of venice in 19th century was recorded case.
Lee de forest was first to bring concept in 1940 from USA to introduce radio guidance and tv guidance to control vehicle systems.
V1 was first ucav. Yes, cruise missile are first ucavs there were prototypes to use radio control as they can change trajectory but nazi military wanted to use for terror instead of precision bombing which would have had terrifying results. It was not wise or dumb decision it was just that they couldnt understand at full in beginning. This bombs concept was introduced in 1935.
So you can say iran was first to field in middle east with proper guidance to guide the aircraft.
not important , the fact that you knew you and your family will disappear without any name of you mentioned if you didn't willingly sign yourself and your two year old child was incentive enough to go to nearest army recruitment center as soon as you saw they are talking about the possibility of mobilizationYou don’t see the differences?
Stalin ruled an empire USSR with allies.
Putin rules a poor Russia fully addicted to oil and gas. No allies, ok accept Iran.
The Red army was famous and successful.
The Russia army sucks.
Putin wants to be Stalin, but I believe he has a problem.
ww1 and ww2 bombersWithout a TV camera you cannot really aim, and are not much better than the Civil War balloons.
let not go into it , its not the place for that , if you want you can open a thread about it and tag me.The fact is that Iran designs based on western ideas and western components, and have very little to brag about.
Dude, it's you say Ukrainian will freeze to death with no electricity and no heat. So how food will go bad if people will freeze to death? Which mean either people freeze to death in above zero temperature, or food go bad quick in subzero temperature...It can't both be true
Do you really have a brain and use it before you say stuff? Or it's just a verbal diarrhea for you? You just puke whatever word out??
Don't answer me tho, as I don't speak Idiots.
Lmao
Weapons grade copium right here
Where to get millions of soldiers? Putin struggles to recruit 300,000 men. The only option: he stops his self invented military ops shit, calling an all-out war, but he must explain to millions of mothers why he sends them to die in foreign countries.