Russia-Ukraine War - News and Developments PART 2

[BHAN85]

That was Russian Tor M1.
Operator made a mistake. Yes

Your iron dumb system is untested except for Hamas sugar pipe rockets.

Let Iran saturate them with cheap targets and missiles. Then decide

If Ukraine wants that system they have just to offer a fair price for it.

By they are used to get all for free from EU dumbshit rulers an d American twisted rulers.

Just pay well and you'll get it.

 

[Hack-Hook]

Where are you getting 3x the price: gas spot prices are 126% from a year ago. So yes they are higher but not 3x. And its not uncle sam, Qatar also supplying a big portion of Gas. So pls check your facts before you make claims. It means the rest of the stuff you post may be as exagerrated and not believable.

get your facts right , not consumer price , but the price that EU buy the gas , only Germany put a 200billion$ subsidiary budget to lower the consumer price, eu right now buy it at 3x time the price it bought gas last year from Russia .
after all when you have USA as Friend you don't need any enemy

 

[gambit]

They are not paying high prices because the yield is low.
They are paying high prices because it is a single source product.

Let us revisit this story...

Chinese distributors reportedly dump dud chips on Russia

What? Sanctions-busting sellers aren't interested in your complaints? That's a shame

www.theregister.com

China has a captive market -- Russia. And Russia, despite the plethora of electronics products in the world, is unable to access any of them. This story illustrate perfectly your example. If there is a single source of DDR5, then Apple and everyone else would paying a premium price no matter the per wafer yield. But there are many sources of DDR5, even if one source maybe slightly behind in tech node than competitors, the availability of many sources drives prices down, and any company whose DDR5 wafers have less than %50 yield will be rejected.

The yield is not defined as how many working die you get per wafer.
It is defined as how many working die you get as a percentage of the actual number of dies.

You also avoided my example. please explain why the low yielding design would be cheaper than the high yielding design, and please avoid introducing new irrelevant parameters.

Because customers do not want them, simple as that. What I presented are very relevant, not just to everyone but to the China-Russia relationship.

As a buyer, I do not care how much you want to recoup your failure rate. If there are alternatives to you, that is an edge in my favor, not yours. If your wafer have a %50 yield, that is suspicious to me. If your wafer is in the new tech node, then we can negotiate, but if your wafer is of established tech nodes same as your competitors, why should I take a chance on yours?

Look at this paragraph in that story...

Even a two percent defect rate is sub-optimal, because products made of many components can therefore experience considerable quality problems. Forty percent failure rates mean supplies are perilously close to being unfit for purpose.​

A %40 failure rate mean ALL the dies on that wafer is suspicious. It mean I do not know what I would be buying from you. A die may pass your tests but could fail mine, a %2 risk I am willing to accept, but not %40. That is what the Russian electronic products manufacturers are telling the world of Chinese semicon sold to Russia. Simplistically speaking, we can say that out of 100 washing machines, each of them have a %40 chance of failure to run. Out of 100 cars, each of them have a %40 chance of getting the Russian equivalent of the 'Check Engine' light. The average Russian would not know until he paid for his stuff.

This story perfectly illustrate the danger of having the world's semicon products so concentrated in Asia. When JPN experienced earthquakes, semicon markets reacted on the next day by raising prices. If China gain control of the SCS, the world would be similar to what Russia is going thru now.

I though that DRAM is never used in space in favour of SRAM

There is a section call 'Commercial DRAM in space'...

https://nepp.nasa.gov/mapld_2009/talks/083109_Monday/06_Troxel_Ian_mapld09_pres_2.pdf

 

[Soldier35]

A Russian Ka-52 helicopter attacked an infantry fighting vehicle of the Ukrainian army with a Vikhr guided missile. Filming of the battle in the Svatovo area.

A Russian Su-35 fighter dropped bombs, presumably a FAB-250, and evaded a Ukrainian soldier's MANPADS missile. The location of the battle in Ukraine is unknown, the FAB-250 bombs seem to slow down, as the explosions occur at the end of the video.

The pilot of the Russian Su-34 fighter-bomber spoke about combat work in Ukraine. Each star on the body of the aircraft is 10 sorties. The main purpose of the sorties of the Su-34 crews is to search for the air defense of the Ukrainian army, which works sporadically, which is why it is difficult to detect.

The Ukrainian army began to use the German IRIS-T SLM air defense system. The medium-range air defense system IRIS-T SLM was created on the basis of an aviation missile by Diehl Defense. The air defense system began to be mass-produced in 2014, but so far it has not yet been adopted by Germany. The complex uses only the Sweden version and Egypt. Perhaps the supply of air defense systems to Ukraine will help the sales of the complex on the world market. The IRIS-T SLM air defense system is a cross between the Russian Buk-M3 and TOR air defense systems. The complex uses IRIS-T air-to-air missiles. They are equipped with an infrared homing head used at the final stage of the missile's flight, the missile's speed is Mach 3. The launch range of the IRIS-T SLM missile is 40 km, the reach in height is 20 km. Judging by expert opinions, the complexes are inferior in some ways and superior in some respects to the air defense systems of Russia. There are many opinions on them, but so far air defense systems are not very popular on the market. Among the shortcomings, the possibility of recapturing the target with an infrared head at low altitudes is noted, but all this is guesswork, since the complexes did not participate in hostilities. The standard equipment of the air defense system includes a command post, radar and launchers with anti-aircraft missiles. The cost of the IRIS-T SLM complex is 178 million euros, missiles are 400 thousand euros.

 

[Paul2]

Indeed, a new world order is taking shape, Russia is to become Chinese bitches.......

It has never been done before since the age of Kingdoms and Empires......

LOL

Not so fast. Putin been trying selling himself to Beijing for as long as I remember, and Beijing has never really went for that.

If Jiang, Hu, or Xi actually wanted Siberia, they would've gone for a deal with Putin years ago I think.

Russians are already selling us pretty much anything at rock bottom prices anyways, thus obviating all these "Chinese invasion of Siberia" talks.

 

[Hack-Hook]

Above water is ALWAYS above ground. Water collect at the lowest point of the ground, if it is above waterline, that mean it is above the lowest point of the ground...............I can't further explain to you as this is simple physics.

Also, you will have a secondary fire if the fireball that crashed into the ground ignite something, that is a fire dude, if a fire ball crashed on, say a car, it can ignite the gasoline inside that car and explode it. Let alone if the drone was intact when intercepted, that can still carry 50 kg of explosive. You may just be seeing the drone exploded after it has been intercepted.

simple explanation for you , drone hit top of the building , not first floor , and the explosion was at top of the buildings.

if you guys consider that as interception , good , I support you intercept 100% of our drones not Just 85% of them


by looking at this and your reactions to it I now completely understand how you intercept 85% of Gran-2 drones .
and no if the drone explode in the sky , the fuel disperse and there won't be such fire on the building and certainly there won't be that explosion , if it get intercepted by shrapnel of a cannon . that explosion only happen if you use a missile against it and it hit the drone directly or if it hit its target and detonate

 

[Hack-Hook]

There shoudl be an award for Bashar and Bearded Khomeni to be responsible for more muslim blood on their hands than Israel could ever come close to (actually while at it, put MBS as well). All three excel at war monging and killing Arabs direclty or by propping them to fight Israel. Iran has the glorious title of having fought with Iraq. So yes only an Iranian idiot would see Assad as a hero. The rest of the muslim world sees him as an Israeli agent who after 30 years still can't re-capture Golan heights but levelled Aleppo

Whats with you guys obsession with mr. Khomeini . he had died 36 year ago

 

[Vergennes]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1585568405322694656

https://twitter.com/x/status/1585556946194669575

 

[Beny Karachun]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1583395191951876096

https://twitter.com/x/status/1583363865236340736

https://twitter.com/x/status/1583390496138743808

Those are some shit tier optics on the KA-52, literally no way to distinguish whether it's an enemy or a friendly.

Whats with you guys obsession with mr. Khomeini . he had died 36 year ago

He means Khamenei, the names are confusing.

 

[jhungary]

simple explanation for you , drone hit top of the building , not first floor , and the explosion was at top of the buildings.

if you guys consider that as interception , good , I support you intercept 100% of our drones not Just 85% of them


by looking at this and your reactions to it I now completely understand how you intercept 85% of Gran-2 drones .
and no if the drone explode in the sky , the fuel disperse and there won't be such fire on the building and certainly there won't be that explosion , if it get intercepted by shrapnel of a cannon . that explosion only happen if you use a missile against it and it hit the drone directly or if it hit its target and detonate

Dude, if that drone hit the top of the building, it would have been exploded right then and there, most drone like this have impact fuse, especially you don't have optical so there can't be anything on remote det.

I mean, the rest of your post seems like ranting, which is beneath you, I mean if you are so dead set on Ukraine did not shot down that particular drone, than you probably have more problem then you are or will be facing in the future.

I interpret the incident as evidence suggested and my experience on damage assessment. That drone detonated above ground, and have secondary explosion, which suggest it HAS BEEN shot down, you are free to think otherwise. I honestly don't really care.

Not so fast. Putin been trying selling himself to Beijing for as long as I remember, and Beijing has never really went for that.

If Jiang, Hu, or Xi actually wanted Siberia, they would've gone for a deal with Putin years ago I think.

Russians are already selling us pretty much anything at rock bottom prices anyways, thus obviating all these "Chinese invasion of Siberia" talks.

I was making a joke......lol

 

[Hack-Hook]

A %40 failure rate mean ALL the dies on that wafer is suspicious. It mean I do not know what I would be buying from you. A die may pass your tests but could fail mine, a %2 risk I am willing to accept, but not %40. That is what the Russian electronic products manufacturers are telling the world of Chinese semicon sold to Russia. Simplistically speaking, we can say that out of 100 washing machines, each of them have a %40 chance of failure to run. Out of 100 cars, each of them have a %40 chance of getting the Russian equivalent of the 'Check Engine' light. The average Russian would not know until he paid for his stuff.

This story perfectly illustrate the danger of having the world's semicon products so concentrated in Asia. When JPN experienced earthquakes, semicon markets reacted on the next day by raising prices. If China gain control of the SCS, the world would be similar to what Russia is going thru now.

the problem here is the failure was 2% , then after sanctions against russia it become 40% and Russia don't buy wafers , it buy chips.
If you buy wafers you get lower price , but there is no guaranty if the chips work or not. when you buy chips , the faulty chips is the responsibility of the producer , they must test the chips and give you working chips .

the only answer is that Russia seems dont buy the chips from manufacturer , they buy it from black markets , there there is no guarantee , the chance you get a faulty chip is even higher than when you buy the wafer.

now in overall perspective , ts not good or bad . it come the the point how much you pay for those chips . is it the price of normal chips ? is it half the price of normal chips , or its more expensive.
as how it translate on your final product , it simple , you had to use the chips before using it no matter from where you bought it . faulty chip means higher operation cost and more expensive final products , but they don't mean lower quality final product , well unless you don't test the chips before using it

Dude, if that drone hit the top of the building, it would have been exploded right then and there, most drone like this have impact fuse, especially you don't have optical so there can't be anything on remote det.

I mean, the rest of your post seems like ranting, which is beneath you, I mean if you are so dead set on Ukraine did not shot down that particular drone, than you probably have more problem then you are or will be facing in the future.

I interpret the incident as evidence suggested and my experience on damage assessment. That drone detonated above ground, and have secondary explosion, which suggest it HAS BEEN shot down, you are free to think otherwise. I honestly don't really care.

and the drone exploded at the impact point which was top of the building , and the fire was on top of the building , the fire didn't fall down(which was the case if the drone exploded in the sky )(and if that was the case , the fire would only have been a small fire not all the building top) , it was started at the impact point .
here you say because the explosion and fire was not at waterline , it was intercepted .
well ok , it get intercepted but by building

 

[Beny Karachun]

the complexes are inferior in some ways and superior in some respects to the air defense systems of Russia.

You mean superior in every way, since Russian garbage air defense barely works

 

[Broccoli]

Russian soldiers training with T-62. If Russia really has thousands T-72 in working condition then T-62 use would be pointless... logical conclusion is that Russian tank T-72 & T-80 reserves aren't as large as claimed.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1585531865011822592

I remember when back in 2015 Russia fanboys were telling me that by 2020 Russian army will have at least 1000 T-14 Armata tanks but in 2022 Russian military is fielding tanks from early 1960's.

 

[Beny Karachun]

That was Russian Tor M1.
Operator made a mistake. Yes

Your iron dumb system is untested except for Hamas sugar pipe rockets.

Let Iran saturate them with cheap targets and missiles. Then decide

Intercepting low flying high speed rockets is a thousand times harder than shooting down your own civilian airliner. Iron Dome intercepted rockets bigger and faster than HIMARS like M302. Also intercepted drones.

Iron Dome is purchased by the US to defend Guam against drones and cruise missiles, also purchased by Azerbaijan, Cyprus, Romania, and many other are looking to buy it.

 

[jhungary]

and the drone exploded at the impact point which was top of the building , and the fire was on top of the building , the fire didn't fall down(which was the case if the drone exploded in the sky )(and if that was the case , the fire would only have been a small fire not all the building top) , it was started at the impact point .
here you say because the explosion and fire was not at waterline , it was intercepted .
well ok , it get intercepted but by building

lol, it really didn't, that was flash explosion captured on 0:20, it's not a fuel-fire detonation. It's a lot easier to see at night because explosion strength shown pretty good with night contrast.

If that drone hit the building and exploded. There will be a flash explosion + fuel fire expanded outward. Like this at 0:05

You can still see the flash and then a fireball expanded into the air and into the direction of travel.

This is NOT presented in the night video at the time of explosion, in fact, the explosive effect got smaller after the flash explosion. Which mean after it exploded, it turns into a fireball and felt to the ground. It was a giant ball due to the radiated expansion in the air that was ignited. If the drone detonated, the fireball will not be round, it will be leaning toward the direction of travel....