What's new

Russia-Ukraine War - News and Developments PART 2

. . . . . .
Dalit said:
Oh what a joy to start the morning like this. Your reap what you sow. A good taste of your own medicine. Now you know what it feels like.



So, why doesn't NATO send its forces to Ukraine to fight Russia? You claim that NATO has superhuman abilities. What good are these abilities if you have to do the fighting on behalf of NATO in cyberspace.

When are you fatty rednecks coming to get Pakistan's nukes? Papa Joe is having sleepless nights LOL
Click to expand...
Same reason you have servants that bring your groceries , make your food, take care of your garden , and clean your bathroom. There is a more suitable and effective option to that.

Every military uses the means to its advantage. Pakistan was using Cobra helicopters in Waziristan, not going in with a sword and a dagger. Your argument is the equivalent of 'hey why don't you bring a sword and a shield to a fight if you are a man'. Its because there are better ways to fight for the person that doesn't want to use a sword and a shield.

If there is a better to way to fight, the country would be stupid enough not to use that better way to fight.

Then there is the matter of crossing a line: NATO has its boundaries. Russia doesn't expand beyond Ukraine and NATO doesn't send its soldiers in because you must know that Ukraine is not part of NATO.

Again , goading and daring is not how wars are won, Its through use of brains. Goading is what Putin's advisers did and Saddam's advisers did. For one the history is not written, the other got caught in a manhole than a rat.

I know you are angry at the expceptionalism that NATO has that despite not putting a single boot on the ground, they brought Russia to a stalemate. But don't let that eat into your intelligent thinking okay.

Generals in a country may hate the enemy but they still think calmly and logically. Not bringing this 'he if you were a real man, you would fight the war with your own solidiers and a bow and arrow'
 
.
. .
alimobin memon said:
Worried. I dont care about Russia as people think here but I still wont believe that it is in loosing side. I just meant that Western media is showing only one side. Ofcourse Russian state media will post mostly things that are not against their country.
Click to expand...
I agree with you. That both media (one by Govt edict, the other by just whats easier to report and preference to be on one side) will do it. Thats why its extra work (and personally why I come to this forum) to understand the other side (not my side).

An extensio to this is: most local US tv channels always give reports on what Police say happened verbatum, including arrested person's footage. 50% of the time those arrested are not the right people, but tv channel doesn't go back and clearify it because its too much trouble. Easier to report what police tell youu.

Back to this topic, I need to understand the other side so I can balance the views out mentally. Of course the process to do that is hamstrung by idiots talking about everything from Russians have trees to US taking Pakistan nukes to hurling insults and distract from the topic.

IN 2003, almost all media was on the side of assuming Saddam had nukes. Of course Saddam also ate this up as he could have come clear at the last minute instead of standing up for a war for nukes that he didn't have.
 
. . . . . .

Similar threads

H
Rassian Foreign Affairs
2 3 4
Replies
48
Views
2K
HaiderAfan
H
fitpOsitive
Attentions desis of Britain
Replies
0
Views
318
fitpOsitive
fitpOsitive
beijingwalker
Zelensky on Ukraine aid: 'This month is the difficulties'
Replies
1
Views
578
aziqbal
aziqbal
S
General News And Discussions About Russia
2 3
Replies
34
Views
2K
AbdulQadir7
A
beijingwalker
EU asks China to influence Russia to return to Grain Deal
Replies
0
Views
555
beijingwalker
beijingwalker

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Military Forum Latest Posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom