Russia-Ukraine War - News and Developments PART 2

[retaxis]

how many ukraine cannon fodder throw themselves into mines and razor wire to be shot like ducks in a barrel today? Did they capture a centimetre or land or lose a centimetre today?

 

[Soldier35]

An attempt to attack a Russian Ka-52 helicopter from the Ukrainian ATGM Stugna. The date and location where the attack was carried out are not reported. It is difficult to get into a flying helicopter from an ATGM, judging by the video, this calculation did not succeed. The firing range of the ATGM "Stugna-P" is up to 5000 meters.

The Ukrainian armored personnel carrier BTR-4 Bucephalus was destroyed by the Russian Lancet kamikaze drone, perhaps the armored vehicle had already been abandoned by the crew. The BTR-4 Bucephalus was put into service in 2008 and is equipped with a 23-mm or 30-mm gun, depending on the modification, as well as a grenade launcher or anti-tank systems. As a result of the impact of the Lancet drone, a fire broke out in the BTR-4, which completely destroyed the armored vehicle.

 

[NotSure]

"Western tech saves the crew":

Spoiler: Bradley: View from the inside after a hit

https://www.reddit.com/r/UkraineRussiaReport/comments/15ljby3

Pay attention to the jammed door. Made in da USA ...

 

[Hack-Hook]

The wagners zombies are dangerous. They are much like fanatics islamic suicide bombers. It’s good move Poland deploys tanks to the border. Putin is a psychopath. He looks ways to widen the war on global scale.

tanks on border , i rather they deployed enough man beside them , those tanks will have hard time countering lancet and atgms

 

[jhungary]

tanks on border , i rather they deployed enough man beside them , those tanks will have hard time countering lancet and atgms

you probably don't want to deploy lancet and atgm when Poland and NATO probably would have undisputed air superiority....ergo, you are going to get butt raped by gunship and mover if you deploy anthing that close

 

[Hack-Hook]

you probably don't want to deploy lancet and atgm when Poland and NATO probably would have undisputed air superiority....ergo, you are going to get butt raped by gunship and mover if you deploy anthing that close

if you want deploy an organized army there . do you consider Wagner an organized army ?
i wonder won't they adopt a strategy of attack and scatter there , more like harassing Poland army than confronting it
wasn't there some complaint of them infiltrating inside Poland ? and lancet and ATGMs can be fired by small disguised teams

 

[jhungary]

if you want deploy an organized army there . do you consider Wagner an organized army ?
i wonder won't they adopt a strategy of attack and scatter there , more like harassing Poland army than confronting it
wasn't there some complaint of them infiltrating inside Poland ? and lancet and ATGMs can be fired by small disguised team

Can you outrun an Apache or F-16? Because once you launch those platform inside Poland, they will pick up a green trail on those platform and they can deploy those asset faster than you can say "oh shoot"

That's before even mentioning how you are going to get ATGM or Lancet drone across the border with 5000 or 10,000 troop, I mean both were 20+ kilogram platform and you will need a truck to carry those. And you can't really hide inside the population as you are not an indigenous force, any Wagner inside Poland will be pick up like hot rock almost immediately by the Poles, unless they recruit an entire Polish raised Wagner. I mean, you can't disguise as civilian in Poland if you don't speak Polish...

 

[Hack-Hook]

Can you outrun an Apache or F-16? Because once you launch those platform inside Poland, they will pick up a green trail on those platform and they can deploy those asset faster than you can say "oh shoot"

that is debatable . the atgm is fired in one or two second the f-16 is not always there , the Apachee can be interesting target for man pads and the lancet can be controlled from anywhere not necessarily from where it launched and the launch itself hardly can be noticed by anything

you are welcome try to locate the launch site like missile launch

actually a small group can easily smuggle those on foot , its not convenient way to use them but it can be done

 

[NotSure]

that is debatable . the atgm is fired in one or two second the f-16 is not always there , the Apachee can be interesting target for man pads and the lancet can be controlled from anywhere not necessarily from where it launched and the launch itself hardly can be noticed by anything

you are welcome try to locate the launch site like missile launch

actually a small group can easily smuggle those on foot , its not convenient way to use them but it can be done

The Apache is even a target for the Lancet itself, if it is on the ground or flying slow and in a predictable manner. The same story with Ka-52, some got downed by Ukrop ATGM, because they flew slow and at low altitude.

And regarding the F-16: Half of Poland is in the range of the Russian S-400 and S-300V4 based in Belarus ...

 

[ZeGerman]

that is debatable . the atgm is fired in one or two second the f-16 is not always there , the Apachee can be interesting target for man pads and the lancet can be controlled from anywhere not necessarily from where it launched and the launch itself hardly can be noticed by anything

you are welcome try to locate the launch site like missile launch

actually a small group can easily smuggle those on foot , its not convenient way to use them but it can be done

There is a reason russia has not harmed an inch of polish land despite it being a logistical and transport hub for ukraine.

There is a reason Russia gave nukes to Belarussia.


This is all hot air.
I actually hope Wagner/Putin is stupid enough to try something as it gives poland an excuse to do the same with irregular group or “the new belarussian liberation front”.

 

[F-22Raptor]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1688933822941822976

https://twitter.com/x/status/1688933825248641026

Russia is quickly running through its Soviet stock

 

[NotSure]

There is a reason Russia gave nukes to Belarussia.

Russia NEVER gave nukes to Belarussia. You Nato NPC can't even get the simplest facts straight. These nukes are based in Belarussia, but all of them are fully under the control of the Russian Armed Forces. No Belarussian Soldier has access to them and especially not to the codes arming the implosion charge in the correct symmetrical way.

 

[Hack-Hook]

There is a reason russia has not harmed an inch of polish land despite it being a logistical and transport hub for ukraine.

There is a reason Russia gave nukes to Belarussia.


This is all hot air.
I actually hope Wagner/Putin is stupid enough to try something as it gives poland an excuse to do the same with irregular group or “the new belarussian liberation front”.

Putin can claim Wagner is illegal group who has no tie with Russia . after all they attempted a coupe and they get exiled .
honestly from day one i had my doubt about sincerity of that move by Pirozhgin., i always taught it was a plan designed by Putin and him to move Wagner outside Russia for later use

about the russia give nuke to belarus i guess the reson is the same as why usa gave nuke to Belgium, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands and Turkey

 

[ZeGerman]

What do you really expect?

USA sends 6500 out of 6500 Bradley? Then itself will remain unarmed with that vast lands that they have.

Well ofcourse not 100%. But would be nice if they give more then the half-1 percent they currently give.

Moreover, USA has always acted smartly. They throw their European dogs under the bus. They can easily manipulate Europeans and turn them against each other. Their soldiers raped French women while supposed to be allies with French LMAO. From their pov, there is no difference between French or Ukrainian cannon fodders just like the WW2 Europeans will kill one an other and at the last moment when they are all on their knees USA will appear to save them (read occupy them).
EU is no more than a biting dog for American thinktanks.

So far this conflict is indeed in US benefit.
That is a different discussion

 

[F-22Raptor]

What do you really expect?

USA sends 6500 out of 6500 Bradley? Then itself will remain unarmed with that vast lands that they have.

Moreover, USA has always acted smartly. They throw their European dogs under the bus. They can easily manipulate Europeans and turn them against each other. Their soldiers raped French women while supposed to be allies with French LMAO. From their pov, there is no difference between French or Ukrainian cannon fodders just like the WW2 Europeans will kill one an other and at the last moment when they are all on their knees USA will appear to save them (read occupy them).

EU is no more than a biting dog for American thinktanks.

Ukraine has lost only 50 Bradley’s through 2 months of fighting and half of those have been repaired.

This is not a high loss rate. That’s only 300 losses over a year. At that rate of loss, the US could supply Ukraine Bradley’s for the next 4-5 years without it ever effecting US Army readiness.