What's new

Russia-Ukraine War - News and Developments PART 2

RPG-30 and NLAW



Russia is fighting against one country what gets weapons and support from outside. If west actually send military units into Ukraine, especially air force, Russians would have been defeated long time ago.

There is no ifs and buts. On top of that, Western countries have an aging and declining population which is not fit for war. It is highly unlikely Western countries will be able to fight a war again the way their ancestors fought WW1 and WW2.
 
Last edited:
Western countries have an aging and declining population which is not fit for war. It is highly unlikely Western countries will be able to fight a war again the way their ancestors fought WW1 and WW2.

There is something you always skip, Western alliance is a collective force. More specifically, NATO is the military organization with the most detailed and complex coordination capacity ever created in world history. Also, don't be shortsighted by just looking at military capability, you need to focus more on science. Is there any other organization like CERN in the world?

Human resources, or rapid aging is an important problem, but but it is not an insurmountable problem. Some fellows from eastern countries, have a mistake to present this deficiency as an overly large problem.

The East's most skilled workforce still goes west. Your brilliant young which you raised with public funds, are dedicating 40-50 years of his/her life to generating profits for European companies and governments.

Not just the top layer; Immigrants from the east still work at the airports, infrastructure constructions, low-level public works, taxis and restaurants in these countries. The inability to create sufficient production for cheap labor and therefore the reaction of the low- and middle-income segments is related to the sharing of the state's social assistance qualifications. Europe's dilemma is caught between immigrant integration or the automation and artificial intelligence solution of low-income jobs. In this respect, the problem is more political. (edit: also, the easiest way to get permanent residency and citizenship in the USA is to join the military since a century. does the discrimination you suffer prevent Asians from joining the army?)

The riches of the world have flowed here for 200 years. Not only the underground riches of Africa, South America and Asia, but everything valuable and profitable flowed here. The demographic reports that you realize today have been in front of European scientists and policy makers for nearly 50 years. Don't they see what you see?

Two important issues are financial environments and academic capacity. Today, the banks of 8 million people Swiss' banks give loans to the infrastructure construction works or military procurements of 100 million-people countries. The academic publication and citation-gives to other scientific studies of the same 8 million Swiss are double that of many Asian countries of 100 million. Now consider this country as a tiny member of the western alliance and what the collective sum is.

Europe is getting old, yes. But as long as Asia's answer is limited to bearing a child, the balances will not change, only the conditions will change.

Military capacity, political tradition, scientific studies, financial structure; all these are phenomena that produce cumulative accumulation. If you can't catch paradigm breaks, the one who started accumulating 50 years ago will always stay ahead of the one who started accumulating today.

Asia must awaken its collective strength.
 
Last edited:
T-90M has pretty high production rate. About 100 per year. Maybe more.
Where you get the number? 100 tanks per year is very little. That means it Vietnam wants to buy 1,000 tanks then will take 10 years? Putin invades a country with such abysmal production number of tanks? He is really very very very delusional.
 
Putin has dug in too deep already with this 'special military operation' which is basically a war. Its gotten to the point where he has to go all out now. He can't just stop at the completion of one objective, (Don bass for example). If he does, he has forced Ukraine into a position where they will be and have already been acquiring very very deadly weaponry en masse, and will also allow them to reform their defensive lines making it harder for the Russians to do another push for Kiev. It was bad enough this year already, it will be worse if he waits.

The Russians have been very....lacking in terms of strategy. It wasn't a smart move to attack.
The only problem is, he can't go all out........because he can only go all out if he had a mobilisation

He can if Russia is being attacked, but it would have been a VERY hard sell to the people to go all out and mobilise, You need something to rally people for an invasion, 8 years of bombing the separatist and denazifying Ukraine can only go so far, Russian would think this is not our problem and refused mobilisation. And if Putin cannot have the troop influx, there are no all out to him. On the other hand, Ukrainian is tailing on Russian attack and mobilising their own people.

Putin has lost this war already, there are no foreseeable way even for the Russian to try for Odessa. Let alone Kyiv. At best he can hope for is to get Donbas and not to lose Kherson, which is almost completely isolated by the Ukrainian, and for those of you who still can't tell, Ukrainian is doing what Russian is doing in Sieverodonetsk. And it would take too many casualty for the Russian to achieve that.
 
Don't be so naive
Well, Russia failed to achieve Air Superiority over Ukraine. And Ukraine didn't even have 1/100 the Aerial Capability the NATO had.

Considering Russian main Mode of Operation is Artillery, Artillery won't work if you do not have Air Superiority, enemy Aerial ISTAR asset will be able to seek out and destroy any artillery piece at will flying 24/7 CAP. The reason why this is not happened now is because Ukraine does not have this capability to fly 24/7 CAP. If you had taken Artillery out of the equation, then what left is just infantry charging.........I wouldn't want to be an Russian infantry if this happen (actually, I wouldn't want to be a Russian infantry now)

If Ukraine have 1/10 of NATO airpower, Russia would probably be defeated already.
 
Where you get the number? 100 tanks per year is very little. That means it Vietnam wants to buy 1,000 tanks then will take 10 years? Putin invades a country with such abysmal production number of tanks? He is really very very very delusional.

100 T-90M is serious capability. I would take 100 T-90M over 1,000 T-72A any day. Likewise, I would take a single Type 45 destroyer over 10 Type 42 destroyers any day.

If Ukraine have 1/10 of NATO airpower, Russia would probably be defeated already.

cec796c6-4230-4630-bc62-07cb09f42718_text.gif
 
Last edited:






Where you get the number? 100 tanks per year is very little. That means it Vietnam wants to buy 1,000 tanks then will take 10 years? Putin invades a country with such abysmal production number of tanks? He is really very very very delusional.

100 T-90M is more than enough to fight Ukraine. Ukraine has low hundreds T-64 at the start of February. Down to almost nil by now. While it is true Ukraine got 200 T-72 from Poland and Czech, those are no match for 100 T-90M and there is nothing in the pipeline for Ukraine. The US and Germany and France the the UK won't give a single tank to Ukraine.
 
100 T-90M is serious capability. I would take 100 T-90M over 1,000 T-72A any day. Likewise, I would take a single Type 45 destroyer over 10 Type 42 destroyers any day.



cec796c6-4230-4630-bc62-07cb09f42718_text.gif
People don’t see T90M in big number, just few. Besides T90M like other Russian tanks has no chance against modern western antitank missiles. storing ammo in turret probably the dumbest idea ever. Zero protection against Javelin top attack with optical guidance. No laser involved. So useless: T90M built in laser detection system. the tank is blind until it explodes.
 
People don’t see T90M in big number, just few. Besides T90M like other Russian tanks has no chance against modern western antitank missiles.

T-90M has laser guided missile range 5 km. It can safely attack from stand off distance. Also, 90% of Allied forces man power is rebels. Russian army is only 10% of man power in Allied forces. Russian army mainly provides air strikes and artillery strikes. That's about it.
 
T-90M has laser guided missile range 5 km. It can safely attack from stand off distance. Also, 90% of Allied forces man power is rebels. Russian army is only 10% of man power in Allied forces. Russian army mainly provides air strikes and artillery strikes. That's about it.
Who will win, big size T90M or small size infantryman with Javelin? That’s propaganda shit. Those Donbas separatists are a bunch of low Iq, poorly armed fighters. Without Russia army those bunches would not survive a month.
 
Who will win, big size T90M or small size infantryman with Javelin? That’s propaganda shit. Those Donbas separatists are a bunch of low Iq, poorly armed fighters. Without Russia army those bunches would not survive a month.

Javelin isn't invulnerable to attack. They are quite easily spotted by drones and killed by long distance snipers. In order for Javelin to hit T-90M it has to get within 2 km. Not gonna be easy with long range snipers operating 1 to 2 km ahead of T-90M.

 
T-90M has pretty high production rate. About 100 per year. Maybe more.

They have bern upgrading old tsnks for decades. Very few new tanks are being built, and facilities are not geared for war conditions. So no, losses will not be replaced any day soon. Tanks in storage seem to have major maintenance issues, due to neglect. The result if s corrupt government.
 

Latest posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom