Yongpeng Sun-Tastaufen
BANNED
- Joined
- Oct 15, 2017
- Messages
- 28,401
- Reaction score
- -82
- Country
- Location
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
no after the war , the victor will write the history and then it would be the end of it .no it is aa straightforward kidnap. The kids are Ukrainian You know when the whataboutism crowd jump in that this one is indefensible. The simple question is does stealing children and indoctrinating them against their own families a war crime. Yes. End of.
Just because you said it's part of Russia does NOT equate to it is Russia.if they are Russian and those area part of Russia then they were not traveled over international border , just transferred from war area to safer province to spare them from war.
sending them to Ukraine would have been trafficking them .
Again a matter of perspective
Hope some Western trolls got their UK passport by now
in a certain country in eastern shore of Mediterranean sea it means the exact thing if you are from a certain religion and the other one is from another religionJust because you said it's part of Russia does NOT equate to it is Russia.
I mean I said your home is mine, does that mean you are trespassing my properties when you are typing?? No one, not even India and/or China recognize Donbas is part of Russia.
as i said they were mostly orphans , now answer me who is guardian for them and responsible for their safety ?Also, look at the definition of Forceful Deportation, it never even mention they need to be bring outside International Border. Technically, the way those word work, you take them out of their legal residence in the occupation zone, you are deporting them. It does not need to go inside Russia.
in a certain country in eastern shore of Mediterranean sea it means the exact thing if you are from a certain religion and the other one is from another religion
as i said they were mostly orphans , now answer me who is guardian for them and responsible for their safety ?
that was not deportation , that was transporting them to safer area when the area was going to be overrun and that was as i recall a voluntary move . they didn't capture them and sent them to other places.....That does not make it right tho.
On the other hand, how do you explain the crime Russia committed in Kherson or anywhere Ukraine took back control? I mean Kherson is still under Ukrainian control, and Russia did deport women and children from Kherson City when they occupied the city, those cases are very well documented.
no , the duty is to occupying force to or government to provide the safety for them not UNICEF or UN and the orphanages are governmental controlled facility , how they can operate without support of the government . also can they provide safety against shelling , missiles and bombs ?You do know there is a concept of "Legal Guardian" right? In most orphan case, it's from the orphanages, if not, as in orphan plugged from the street, the default procedure is to contact the UNICEF as per UN convention on the rights of the child
that was not deportation , that was transporting them to safer area when the area was going to be overrun and that was as i recall a voluntary move . they didn't capture them and sent them to other places
no , the duty is to occupying force to or government to provide the safety for them not UNICEF or UN and the orphanages are governmental controlled facility , how they can operate without support of the government . also can they provide safety against shelling , missiles and bombs ?