What's new

Russia-Ukraine War - News and Developments PART 2

Wake up Jose. You got nukes and we got nukes, if you want to go back 200 years ago, why not try 800 years ago during the Mongol invasion, technically Yuan is a sinized Mongol dynasty. Look at NATO now, they have no guts to even step in to defend Ukriane. You see any American soldiers? Russia is NK, then why doesn't NATO dare to even fight Russia. You guys are just using proxy Ukrainians.
Ask yourself why there is no PLA boy and girl in Ukraine. Russia invades Ukraine you expect the US in Ukraine? You don’t know Ukraine is not in the NATO?
 
.
The episode of the battle of the Russian reconnaissance group of the Airborne Forces in Ukraine. During the patrol, the military discovered a stronghold of the Ukrainian army. The company commander decided to join the battle. With the support of fire from the BMD-2K-AU airborne combat vehicle and ATGM strikes, it was possible to destroy the stronghold of the Ukrainian army.


Video of Polish 155 mm self-propelled guns Krab in Ukraine. Ukraine purchased 54 of these self-propelled guns and 15 more transferred to Poland from storage. The self-propelled guns were developed in 2000, and there were many problems during its creation. The self-propelled guns can hardly be called Polish; many foreign units are used in the design. Chassis ACS K9 licensed production by Samsung, power plant German diesel engine MT 881 Ka-500, 1,000 hp. With. The howitzer barrel is manufactured by Rheinmetall from Germany. Depending on the type of ammunition, self-propelled guns can hit targets at a distance of 30 to 40 kilometers. The rate of fire of the installation is 6 rounds per minute, the practical rate of fire for long-term combat work is 2 rounds per minute. Howitzer ammunition 40 shells.

 
. .
The episode of the battle of the Russian reconnaissance group of the Airborne Forces in Ukraine. During the patrol, the military discovered a stronghold of the Ukrainian army. The company commander decided to join the battle. With the support of fire from the BMD-2K-AU airborne combat vehicle and ATGM strikes, it was possible to destroy the stronghold of the Ukrainian army.


It doesnt make any sense to me. Reconnaissance unit discover ukrainian stronghold within the range of small arms fire and no returning fire from the stronghold? Looks more like a training mission.
 
.
Ask yourself why there is no PLA boy and girl in Ukraine. Russia invades Ukraine you expect the US in Ukraine? You don’t know Ukraine is not in the NATO?
Hahahahah you might as well say Vietnam did not send soldiers to Ukraine, so US doesn't need to either. Lololol
 
.
Hahahahah you might as well say Vietnam did not send soldiers to Ukraine, so US doesn't need to either. Lololol
I heard here thousands times why no US army in Ukraine? Why no German troops? People are either dumb or ignorant. Why Ukraine needs foreign armies at all? Ukraine needs weapons. Ukraine has general mobilization, the country can mobilize millions men and women to fight the Russians.

Dare Putin invades one of NATO countries then we will see what hell will break loose. Should it come to nuclear exchange I don’t think China will be spared.

You are the one of few who supports Russia war of aggression. People here don’t forget it.
 
.
I heard here thousands times why no US army in Ukraine? Why no German troops? People are either dumb or ignorant. Why Ukraine needs foreign armies at all? Ukraine needs weapons. Ukraine has general mobilization, the country can mobilize millions men and women to fight the Russians.

Dare Putin invades one of NATO countries then we will see what hell will break loose. Should it come to nuclear exchange I don’t think China will be spared.

You are the one of few who supports Russia war of aggression. People here don’t forget it.
You can give all the excuse you want. There is only ONE reason why NATO is not sending troops. They are afraid of Russia. All this hanky panky backdoor shit, it's all facade, no European dares to directly fight Russia.
 
.
You can give all the excuse you want. There is only ONE reason why NATO is not sending troops. They are afraid of Russia. All this hanky panky backdoor shit, it's all facade, no European dares to directly fight Russia.
Russia has nukes otherwise no country in Europe is afraid of. Russia conventional army under Putin is more propaganda. Russia or USSR was invaded by numerous European countries. Please learn history.
Russia is like NK, a poor country with nukes.
If Vietnam had nukes we would sleep better at nights.
 
.
Russia has nukes otherwise no country in Europe is afraid of. Russia conventional army under Putin is more propaganda. Russia or USSR was invaded by numerous European countries. Please learn history.
Russia is like NK, a poor country with nukes.
If Vietnam had nukes we would sleep better at nights.

Equating NK with Russia is one of theost delusional thing I have ever heard, please ask NK to invade 20% of SK first.
 
.
Russia has nukes otherwise no country in Europe is afraid of. Russia conventional army under Putin is more propaganda. Russia or USSR was invaded by numerous European countries. Please learn history.
Russia is like NK, a poor country with nukes.
If Vietnam had nukes we would sleep better at nights.
To be fair, do NATO really need to send troop in Ukraine to deal with Russia?

Russia is now STALLED in all fronts, in the East, only minor movement was done and the last is 2 weeks ago when they took the power plant in East Donbas, major movement have not got any traction since they took Sieverodonetsk and Lysychansk back in June. In the South, they are bogged down by Ukrainian counter offensive, Crimea is under attack, Kherson Oblast east of Dnieper river was under attack. There are no progress whatsoever at all since maybe May.

Economic is crumbling, with inflation hit 34% last week, (compared to US's 7% and Australia 5.8%), no currency reserve left in their bank.

All these without a single NATO troop on the ground, which makes you wonder would Ukraine needed NATO to begin with. We may just sell them weapon when this is all over and they are holding Russia well on their own.
 
.
Last time you faced a corrupt dying dynasty ruling over an agrarian society of illiterate peasants. Today you are facing the largest industrial power on earth with 1.4 billion educated citizens.

If you want to give us the opportunity to whoop your *** in round 2, bring your troops over. We always love a good bout of revenge. Do you even have enough working ships to sail your tiny armies over?
Last time you faced a corrupt dying dynasty ruling over an agrarian society of illiterate peasants. Today you are facing the largest industrial power on earth with 1.4 billion educated citizens.

If you want to give us the opportunity to whoop your *** in round 2, bring your troops over. We always love a good bout of revenge. Do you even have enough working ships to sail your tiny armies over?
“Were the kingdom of the middle, the rest are puny barbarians who should give us tribute!”. Again…we know how that ends up.

Please…with all your educated population, do something about your lack of freedoms and maintain a peaceful rise instead of sable rattling around taiwan.

You can give all the excuse you want. There is only ONE reason why NATO is not sending troops. They are afraid of Russia. All this hanky panky backdoor shit, it's all facade, no European dares to directly fight Russia.
Nato is a defensive alliance on the rule of “an attack on one is an attack on all”
In case you did not notice…ukraine is not part of Nato.

That no one is jumping to start a war with a nuclear power does not equal fear.
With russias shit performance the image of “the bear” is also hugely degraded.
 
Last edited:
.
Main Spanish newspaper (El Mundo) talked yesterday about a attack with missiles in the Crimea blast.

Maybe they know something that the rest of mortals we ignore, or maybe they are just idiots.

 
.
Russians have reached the Centre of Bakhmut


They infiltrated camp bastion wearing Afghan Army uniform not tennis shoes. Your confusion is understandable, perhaps you mistook the attack on Camp Bastion for the PNS Mehran incident. You know the one in which sandal clad TTP terrorist nearly destroyed the naval air HQ...or is it the Kamra base attack circa 2012, during which the PAF Erieye fleet was nearly wiped out.

British forces were responsible for perimeter security on that day at Camp Bastion - so overall, not something you'd wanna troll about.


What a retarded post

Only 1 ERIEYE was lost rest were repaired

And Kamra was not in a active way zone invading other countries so comparison is even more stupid
 
. . .

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom