What's new

Russia-Ukraine War - News and Developments PART 2

. . .
More Russian showcase material sitting in Syria: if not to be used over Syria, against attacking aircraft, who did they put it in for: the Kurdish rebels?
This happened because of US/NATO- Russia "military politics" in Syria...,politics preceeds military action or inaction. Relax your frustration from my seeing S400s smoke 90% of NATo equipment that flies.
We don't know effectiveness of S-400, that much is true.
Lol- but it earned the longest air defense interception against an aircraft in Ukraine months ago...and we know China and India both trust it to defend their countries..a.nd even Turkey fought NATo to acquire it- you think you know more about its reliability than these 3 countries?
But to say that Russian's are holding use of it for some bigger enemy is laughable.
its only laughable to you, enjoy your joke by yourself.
This is the same argument that Russia has 1000s of T-80s but saving that for some future battle while sending older T models to battlefront TODAY
then send in NATO and learn the hard way? Because NATO is unable to deploy forces on the ground now, despite having over "30 countries, trillions of $ of economic blah blah",..thats all nice, but it mostly exists on paper- US military is very unwilling today to fight a conventional war against a conventional foe- Ukraine war is a good example - reality shows NATO is afraid to directly engage and finish off an apparently weakened Russia. Wee are waiting..

But Ukrainians keep losing so much territory now! Opytne they've lost, Russians entered Klichevka, Ukraine just keeps losing territory and Russia keeps gaining them...NATo gonna have to send in its ground forces soon, or Ukraine goes down for the permanent count - Russian artillery and SWEET SWEET SHAHED 136s have obviously decimated Ukrainian military's logistical backend- thats why terrritory is being lost quickly.


>> Fantastic article on the strategic failures of Putin - worth a read by all.
The vast majority of US and UK news sources dont give complete and accurate information on the Ukraine war- enjoy your confirmation bias- Telegraph.co.uk has obviously been influenced by the UK govt somehow,esp on the Ukraine war.
 
.
.
Congrats

Russia has multiple armies: the regular army, the FSB, the security apparatus, the Wagner hooligans, the Kadyrow’s Chechens, the separatist armies. As if not enough, now a new army called “Patriots” led by Russia defense minister Shoigu himself.

 
.
Congrats

Russia has multiple armies: the regular army, the FSB, the security apparatus, the Wagner hooligans, the Kadyrow’s Chechens, the separatist armies, now the a new army “Patriots” led by Russia defense minister Shoigu himself.


That's what a 150 million people country can do. They can afford to raise a big army. On the other hand, Ukraine being a 30 million people country has more limited human resource.
 
.
That's what a 150 million people country can do. They can afford to raise a big army. On the other hand, Ukraine being a 30 million people country has more limited human resource.
A big army ok but not multiple armies. Looks to me Russia is hijacked by private mafia groups. “Patriots” is a nationalist racist group of gangsters.
 
. .
This happened because of US/NATO- Russia "military politics" in Syria...,politics preceeds military action or inaction. Relax your frustration from my seeing S400s smoke 90% of NATo equipment that flies.
It is a highly boasted weapon that when time for use was there did not work or was not used.

And despite its use in ukraine, has been unable to gain air dominance.

Its seems like a lot of hot air. An unproven weapon so far.

then send in NATO and learn the hard way? Because NATO is unable to deploy forces on the ground now, despite having over "30 countries, trillions of $ of economic blah blah",..thats all nice, but it mostly exists on paper-

Nonsense. Military armaments are massive and hardly used yet.

Nuclear deterrence is a major reason russia is not being kicked out of ukraine by Nato. repeated many times but you just keep screaming “chicken chicken, cowards must be weak else why would they not attack a country with 10.000 nukes!?”

Seriously low IQ….or maybe you are 12 years old or something.
US military is very unwilling today to fight a conventional war against a conventional foe- Ukraine war is a good example - reality shows NATO is afraid to directly engage and finish off an apparently weakened Russia. Wee are waiting..
Keep waiting.
1. Nato does not want nuclear brinkmanship.
2. Nato (especially USA) benefits from a more drawn out proxy conflict instead of sending more then single digit % military aid.
But Ukrainians keep losing so much territory now! Opytne they've lost, Russians entered Klichevka, Ukraine just keeps losing territory and Russia keeps gaining them...
1 village in a month?

What a result from 300.000 extra mobilised troops!

NATo gonna have to send in its ground forces soon, or Ukraine goes down for the permanent count - Russian artillery and SWEET SWEET SHAHED 136s have obviously decimated Ukrainian military's logistical backend- thats why terrritory is being lost quickly.
Quickly? Another low IQ nonsense analysis.

The vast majority of US and UK news sources dont give complete and accurate information on the Ukraine war- enjoy your confirmation bias- Telegraph.co.uk has obviously been influenced by the UK govt somehow,esp on the Ukraine war.

Yea russian propaganda is much more reliable. How is the moskva doing?

Congrats

Russia has multiple armies: the regular army, the FSB, the security apparatus, the Wagner hooligans, the Kadyrow’s Chechens, the separatist armies. As if not enough, now a new army called “Patriots” led by Russia defense minister Shoigu himself.

Terrible for cohesion and combined warfare.

Little armies here and there hardly communicating or working together.
More cannon fodder basically
 
.
Ukrainian Navy corvette F 211 Hetman Ivan Mazepa, during equipping activities.
FlZDxQQXkAcBhh2
 
.
It is a highly boasted weapon that when time for use was there did not work or was not used.

And despite its use in ukraine, has been unable to gain air dominance.

Its seems like a lot of hot air. An unproven weapon so far.



Nonsense. Military armaments are massive and hardly used yet.

Nuclear deterrence is a major reason russia is not being kicked out of ukraine by Nato. repeated many times but you just keep screaming “chicken chicken, cowards must be weak else why would they not attack a country with 10.000 nukes!?”

Seriously low IQ….or maybe you are 12 years old or something.

Keep waiting.
1. Nato does not want nuclear brinkmanship.
2. Nato (especially USA) benefits from a more drawn out proxy conflict instead of sending more then single digit % military aid.

1 village in a month?

What a result from 300.000 extra mobilised troops!


Quickly? Another low IQ nonsense analysis.



Yea russian propaganda is much more reliable. How is the moskva doing?


Terrible for cohesion and combined warfare.

Little armies here and there hardly communicating or working together.
More cannon fodder basically
That explains the Russians high casualty died by “friendly fire”. They kill themselves before Ukraine artillery kill them.
 
. . . .

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom