Ultima Thule
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Jan 26, 2012
- Messages
- 16,725
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
IN FRONT OF THE WORLD BEST SHIPS THIS NOTHING BUT SHIT WITH MINIMAL WEAPONS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
IN FRONT OF THE WORLD BEST SHIPS THIS NOTHING BUT SHIT WITH MINIMAL WEAPONS
IN FRONT OF THE WORLD BEST SHIPS THIS NOTHING BUT SHIT WITH MINIMAL WEAPONS
With only 32 medium range SAM you would be joking and as for firing kalibers first these ships come close to the USA east and west coasts where USN and NATO navies waiting for themIt can shoot at any land target with Kalibr / Kalibr M LACM and escort Russia's new aircraft carriers. Anyway, it's mainly used for counter terror COIN warfare in Syria.
With only 32 medium range SAM you would be joking and as for firing kalibers first these ships come close to the USA east and west coasts where USN and NATO navies waiting for them
What the fcuk is this the project started in 90s so no threats from these terrorists and they spent billions of dollars to develop these ships to fight only terrorists does these terrorists have anti ship missilesThese aren't used to bomb the US. These are used to COIN warfare in Syria and to protect Russia's ports along the Mediterranean from Islamist groups hostile to Russia.
1600 nukes return to Russia,few Tu-160 were scrap by Ukraine rest of Tu-160 return by Ukraine to Russia and they have few big shipyards like St.petersburge that they can build big ships like destroyers/aircraft carrier/submarines etc etc Ukraine's shipyard wasn't the only one that only build best Soviet ships in Soviet eraUkraine is worse than Russia.
When the Soviet Union collapsed, Ukraine was the granary of Europe, the best shipyard of the Soviet Union, the best intercontinental ballistic missile factory, and the best aircraft factory.
What about now?In the United States under the temptation of the destruction of nuclear weapons, the destruction of the Tu 160 bombers And 1,600 nuclear warheads..
Russia has no access to shipyards for the construction of large surface ships,It turns out that these shipyards are in Ukraine.Ukraine is real Spendthrift
I think they are much better than what Pakistan and india has so we have no morality to criticize them,they have not fooled and looted the world through using their paper currency like u.s has done using dollars and promoted poverty in rest of world so it is great achievement that they make such weapons using their limited legitimate money
When this happened???they blocked Karachi and Chittagong,
and kid how old you're, when this project started in late 80s/early 90s there were no threat by these terrorists to Russia and they spends billions to develop these ships to only fight these terrorists, are these terrorists have latest anti ship missilesThese aren't used to bomb the US. These are used to COIN warfare in Syria and to protect Russia's ports along the Mediterranean from Islamist groups hostile to Russia.
Sir, russians had also fooled and looted the other people. In eastern Europe, in central asia, Afghanistan, korea, veitnam every where they got access they did it. They forced the artificial equality of rubble to the dollar to fullfil their desires. But the afghan war was a wrong turn in their colonization scheme. So they were struck there and never ever able to lift their back. In 1971 how they they blocked Karachi and Chittagong, and Brezhnev threatened Pakistan. Even the Soviet Union was the more brutal than the American in my opinion. Thanks
no UN back, but UN recognized. are you playing semantics because you cant counter that point?their is no UN backed govt in Syria, lame justification you have
Well when you compare the fact that Russia currently has as much influence as the US in the Middle East today, with only using 1 main base in SYria vs US having 10s of bases in the Middle East. Russia can apparently use light,lean military machinese to essentially achieve the same thing a much larger size of the US military will be need to achieve the same objective(s).mostly outdated, 70s and 80s era ships, and corvette is nothing in front of Destroyers and Frigates, doesn't able to reach in deep and open oceans like Destroyers and Frigates
No ASSAd govt is not Recognized by UN, please provide the proofs of your claimsno UN back, but UN recognized. are you playing semantics because you cant counter that point?
none sense postno UN back, but UN recognized. are you playing semantics because you cant counter that point?
Well when you compare the fact that Russia currently has as much influence as the US in the Middle East today, with only using 1 main base in SYria vs US having 10s of bases in the Middle East. Russia can apparently use light,lean military machinese to essentially achieve the same thing a much larger size of the US military will be need to achieve the same objective(s).
I'm basically telling you that US has extra military power that is essentially useless in changing global order much, unline before/few decades ago- US cant stop China now from grabbing Hong Kong, US didnt stop Iran from delivering its fuel to Venezuela...bra!! stop playing!! the world has already changed and your ignorance can hurt your nation. If US fights CHina today, US will enter double depression.
No ASSAd govt is not Recognized by UN, please provide the proofs of your claims
That's doesn't means UN backing Assad's govt but condemned Assad govt barbaric acts in SyriaIt is a UN member state. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syria
That's doesn't means UN backing Assad's govt but condemned Assad govt barbaric acts in Syria