Russia Hinduism

[Kamikaze Pilot]

 

[Kamikaze Pilot]

A Well Educated Lady Became Aghori!!!

This woman is so beautiful! Her husband/her love must be so lucky.

 

[Bitter Melon]

This woman is so beautiful! Her husband/her love must be so lucky.

How will her husband be lucky? To become an Aghor she has forsaken society including her family. So where does luck come into picture?

 

[FullMetalJacket]

Would you look at that. Hindus spreading their faith peacefully, can we name certain Abrahamic faiths that utilized other methods?

 

[Nilgiri]

@abcxyz0000

Thanks a lot for this thread bro, it will take a while to go through all the videos

 

[Anubis]

From one myth to another...atleast the commies tried to get rid of religion.

 

[Nilgiri]

From one myth to another...atleast the commies tried to get rid of religion.

They just ended up killing 100 million people in the process too...so theres that.

 

[FullMetalJacket]

From one myth to another...atleast the commies tried to get rid of religion.

Anything is better than islam after all.

 

[Anubis]

They just ended up killing 100 million people in the process too...so theres that.

Yeah...well that was Stalin.

Anything is better than islam after all.

If you are trying to provoke by assuming that I have some love for Islam than sorry to disappoint you...flying horses and flying monkeys are both the same to me...and the commies were trying to get rid of Orthodox Christianity which is the prevalent religion in Russia.(Incase you did not know what I was talking about in my original post).

 

[Nilgiri]

Yeah...well that was Stalin.

Dont forget Mao....and Hitler (Socialist/leftist-nationalist at heart)....and all the other leftist dictators all around the world that add to it (Esp in Africa and Latin America).

Anyways going off topic now.

 

[Anubis]

Dont forget Mao....and Hitler (Socialist/leftist-nationalist at heart)....and all the other leftist dictators all around the world that add to it (Esp in Africa and Latin America).

Anyways going off topic now.

Hitler was far right...Catholic blessed by the cross dressers from Rome.

 

[Nilgiri]

Hitler was far right...Catholic blessed by the cross dressers from Rome.

Thats a lie. The very name Nazi stands for National Socialists. Their motto was the common good is more important than the private good.

Just because he hated communism does not mean he was on the far right....or even right or centre.

He nationalised many factors of production + retail outlets, set many govt backed prices and wages, brought severe capital controls and only begrudgingly allowed private enterprise to flourish in large industries of "importance" (that he again picked).

Such heavy intervention into the free market is not indicative of the right or even centre. He was a leftish through and through...but the left simply have labelled him as "on the right" just because he was against his fellow leftists (who were further left than he was).

His racist ideology was external to the whole political/economic spectrum.

He hated catholics with a vengeance quite early on (saw them basically as close to Jews + Jesus and external to german govt control unlike protestant churches who's power lay within German society and could thus be manipulated and controlled over time), so it doesn't matter what the catholic church did to appease him early on (and then regretted). It's certainly not reflective of what Hitler thought about them.

Hitler himself was not a religious guy and saw the established religion in general as a threat to Nazi ideology. A true totalitarian and autocrat...he just didn't manage to implement these objectives because of WW2 and bigger priorities and saw that religion was a useful tool to bind that segment of the population that was religious to the country (similar to how Stalin allowed the orthodox church to operate in WW2 to rally the faithful in a religio-nationalist fervour).

@The Sandman @Desert Fox... your views?

 

[Anubis]

Thats a lie. The very name Nazi stands for National Socialists. Their motto was the common good is more important than the private good.

Just because he hated communism does not mean he was on the far right....or even right or centre.

He nationalised many factors of production + retail outlets, set many govt backed prices and wages, brought severe capital controls and only begrudgingly allowed private enterprise to flourish in large industries of "importance" (that he again picked).

Such heavy intervention into the free market is not indicative of the right or even centre. He was a leftish through and through...but the left simply have labelled him as "on the right" just because he was against his fellow leftists (who were further left than he was).

His racist ideology was external to the whole political/economic spectrum.

He hated catholics with a vengeance quite early on (saw them basically as close to Jews + Jesus and external to german govt control unlike protestant churches who's power lay within German society and could thus be manipulated and controlled over time), so it doesn't matter what the catholic church did to appease him early on (and then regretted). It's certainly not reflective of what Hitler thought about them.

Hitler himself was not a religious guy and saw the established religion in general as a threat to Nazi ideology. A true totalitarian and autocrat...he just didn't manage to implement these objectives because of WW2 and bigger priorities and saw that religion was a useful tool to bind that segment of the population that was religious to the country (similar to how Stalin allowed the orthodox church to operate in WW2 to rally the faithful in a religio-nationalist fervour).

@The Sandman @Desert Fox... your views?

I know he was on the left spectrum in case of economic policies....but his social policies were on the right..just like we have libertarians here...who are fiscally far right and socially far left...he was the opposite of libertarians..According to Speer Hitler ordered his homies to remain members of the church when everyone else was leaving it...and according to Goebbels Hitler believed that Jesus was trying to rid the world of Jewish domination and that's why they crucified him..Paul later made the fake modern Christianity which Hitler despised...Hitler understandably had a catholic upbringing because of his distance with his father and closeness with his practicing Catholic mother. Hitler did make conflicting remarks about religion and the church(he made a lot of conflicting remarks about a lot of things) but I don't think anybody argues the widespread Christian anti-Semetism at that time not only inspired him but also drove a significant portion of the German population(who were catholics and lutherans) to support him. Lutheran Christianity is probably the most anti-semetic religion in the world(even more so than Catholics and Sunnis)...and huge number of germans were lutherans.

 

[Nilgiri]

I know he was on the left spectrum in case of economic policies....but his social policies were on the right..just like we have libertarians here...who are fiscally far right and socially far left...he was the opposite of libertarians..According to Speer Hitler ordered his homies to remain members of the church when everyone else was leaving it...and according to Goebbels Hitler believed that Jesus was trying to rid the world of Jewish domination and that's why they crucified him..Paul later made the fake modern Christianity which Hitler despised...Hitler understandably had a catholic upbringing because of his distance with his father and closeness with his practicing Catholic mother. Hitler did make conflicting remarks about religion and the church(he made a lot of conflicting remarks about a lot of things) but I don't think anybody argues the widespread Christian anti-Semetism at that time not only inspired him but also drove a significant portion of the German population(who were catholics and lutherans) to support him. Lutheran Christianity is probably the most anti-semetic religion in the world(even more so than Catholics and Sunnis)...and huge number of germans were lutherans.

I talk only from the economics standpoint.

From the social standpoint, any authoritarianism is bad for me (whether it stems from leftist or rightist ideology). You either have support of authoritarianism or you are for personal freedom. To me thats another set of axes independent of left/right.

I don't support the use of left/right here because both can indulge in totalitarianism (in fact leftism can almost exclusively survive only with totalitarianism) so it seems kind of stupid to have the same spectrum labels (left/right) as that which exists in the economic context.

The use of left and right to label liberal/progressivism and authoritarianism respectively is instrumentally confusing and this has been exploited by various quarters unfortunately. I mean its like saying Stalin and Mao were on the right as well as is Kim Jong Un fellow currently because they are all highly supportive of totalitarianism and autocratic rule. But do we label them as rightists like Hitler in that case?

 

[Anubis]

I talk only from the economics standpoint.

From the social standpoint, any authoritarianism is bad for me (whether it stems from leftist or rightist ideology). You either have support of authoritarianism or you are for personal freedom. To me thats another set of axes independent of left/right.

I don't support the use of left/right here because both can indulge in totalitarianism (in fact leftism can almost exclusively survive only with totalitarianism) so it seems kind of stupid to have the same spectrum labels (left/right) as that which exists in the economic context.

The use of left and right to label liberal/progressivism and authoritarianism respectively is instrumentally confusing and this has been exploited by various quarters unfortunately. I mean its like saying Stalin and Mao were on the right as well as is Kim Jong Un fellow currently because they are all highly supportive of totalitarianism and autocratic rule. But do we label them as rightists like Hitler in that case?

I agree with you on the fact that there is a problem with the labeling....for social contexts we can say liberal and conservative but here in Murica they use liberal and conservative mostly from an economics standpoint.