Russia gives open ultimatum of electronic war on any jet trying to attack Syria from Mediterranean

[UKBengali]

Russians are now supplying Syria with s300 because s200 was too old and couldn't differentiate between isreali jet and downed Russian aircraft.

Israeli "darh hoshiyaari" have come back to bite them on their arse.

Could not agree more.
These Russians are playing too many games at the same time.
They are not as clever as they think they are!

 

[500]

Prior February 2018 Israel refrained from attacking Syrian SAMs, since they don't posses much threat to attacking jets. However then they attacked Israeli fighters which were flying deep inside Israel and not expecting the attack and managed to shot 1 firing over 20 missiles.

Just few hours after that event Israel destroyed the S-200.

 

[Hakikat ve Hikmet]

Here is an Image of first shipment of electronic warfare system being delivered to Syria.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1044542984031797248

But not with S-300 plus Krasukha-4 this is a lethal combo.

With the jammer you will never know if there is a missile coming for you or not.

Hence, Pak should actively consider ASELSAN KORAL EW systems with TOT and further development to her particular needs!!! I am pretty sure Pak already has some of such capabilities...

 

[Trango Towers]

We are traind with the s-300 also .

You were also gas engineers during ww2. Now jog on

 

[WinterNights]

Prior February 2018 Israel refrained from attacking Syrian SAMs, since they don't posses much threat to attacking jets. However then they attacked Israeli fighters which were flying deep inside Israel and not expecting the attack and managed to shot 1 firing over 20 missiles.

Just few hours after that event Israel destroyed the S-200.

Hooray you managed to shoot an ancient and static s-200.
The real hilarious thing here is that the ancient s-200 shot down your fighter jet

 

[500]

Hooray you managed to shoot an ancient and static s-200.

1) Israel could destroy S-200 in any given moment (and we proved it destroying it in few hours after the attack). We did not destroy it as act of good will, which payed bad.
2) This S-200 was not alone. It was protected by most modern Buk M2 and Pantsyr systems. Yet they failed to protect it.

The real hilarious thing here is that the ancient s-200 shot down your fighter jet

During the the first gulf war ancient systems destroyed over 50 modern jets. I'll tell you a secret: there is no much difference in terms of capabilities between the S-200 and S-300.

 

[vizier]

This and the transfer of the delayed S300s would be sort of a game changer for a while. As the Idlib operation stopped this can also be considered as an item to convince Syrian govt to halt further operations as well.

However if the transfer of S300s includes items of agreement behind the scenes like Iran stopping any further arms transfers(sams fighter planes etc.) then there can be further complications. For example if Syrian govt rejects any future agreement like considers a near future voting for Syrian presidency rigged, having frauds or similar then Russia would use this as a leverage to pressure Syrian govt. Since with a single control button all air defense can be downed leaving behind the S200s and remaining buks against coalition air operation threats.

The equipment quality of Syrias other partner Iran can be much lower and less tested than the Russian systems but it is always better to buy and diversify from multiple suppliers as you cant be good with all suppliers all the time because of conflicting interests.

 

[WinterNights]

1) Israel could destroy S-200 in any given moment (and we proved it destroying it in few hours after the attack).

Any nation with a decent strike capability can destroy an ancient and static systems like s-200.

did not destroy it as act of good will, which payed bad.

lol what a load of none-sense

2) This S-200 was not alone. It was protected by most modern Buk M2

BS

and Pantsyr systems. Yet they failed to protect it.

more BS

During the the first gulf war ancient systems destroyed over 50 modern jets. I'll tell you a secret: there is no much difference in terms of capabilities between the S-200 and S-300.

Lay off the crack kid, you're obviously high

 

[500]

Any nation with a decent strike capability can destroy an ancient and static systems like s-200.

Protected by dozens of Buk-2M, Pantsyrs and hundreds of fighter jets? LOL your Khamenaist air force can't do that for sure.

lol what a load of none-sense

Explain me why Israel did not destroy S-200 prior the February 2018.

BS

more BS

Assad has 24 Buk 2M and 36 Pantsyrs. Well 35 now.

Lay off the crack kid, you're obviously high

Tell me the difference. You love to repeat static, so I'll tell you secret: Russian S-400 did not move one inch since they arrived 3 years ago.

 

[WinterNights]

Protected by dozens of Buk-2M, Pantsyrs and hundreds of fighter jets? LOL your Khamenaist air force can't do that for sure.

That's fantasy kid. Nobody buys your BS.

Explain me why Israel did not destroy S-200 prior the February 2018.

Because back then they had not humiliated your airforce by shooting down a plane using this ancient system. You tried to desperately save face.

Assad has 24 Buk 2M and 36 Pantsyrs. Well 35 now.

And?

Tell me the difference. You love to repeat static, so I'll tell you secret: Russian S-400 did not move one inch since they arrived 3 years ago.

The fact you even have to ask the difference shows you don't have the brain capacity to understand. As for S-400, that's not there to protect Assad.

 

[500]

Because back then they had not humiliated your airforce by shooting down a plane using this ancient system. You tried to desperately save face.

I told you already that in gulf war coalition lost over 50 jets to more ancient systems. You dont know it since u are an ignorant.

And?

If you think that Assad with dozens of Buks and Pantsyrs did not use them to protect his long range systems then u are an imbecile.

The fact you even have to ask the difference shows you don't have the brain capacity to understand. As for S-400, that's not there to protect Assad.

Fact that u can't answer properly. Both S-300V and S-200 have SAHR guidance, both have over 2000 m/s max speed. Range and warhead of S-200 is even higher.

 

[Ceylal]

We are traind with the s-300 also .

An forty year old system....Tomatoes just went green and Israel has to adjust its palate to,it...If the Russian decides to go ape sh...it, then you’re done billy bad a.....ss!

Prior February 2018 Israel refrained from attacking Syrian SAMs, since they don't posses much threat to attacking jets. However then they attacked Israeli fighters which were flying deep inside Israel and not expecting the attack and managed to shot 1 firing over 20 missiles.

Just few hours after that event Israel destroyed the S-200.

Well Seif El yahood, since I don’t know the exact translation in Hebrew of your Saudi BFF pseudo, since you both relies on respective boiling room to flood this forum with lies , bravado that neither of your country possesses..

In war eggs get broken...and this radar costs a lot less than the F16 or the F35 that were junked by a grand pa AD system...

1) Israel could destroy S-200 in any given moment (and we proved it destroying it in few hours after the attack). We did not destroy it as act of good will, which payed bad.
2) This S-200 was not alone. It was protected by most modern Buk M2 and Pantsyr systems. Yet they failed to protect it.

That was just a fluke , it happens when troops are tired overwhelmed and forget to reload or keep the system alive..
Question: How many other Syrian system, has Israel destroyed after that Pantsir...

During the the first gulf war ancient systems destroyed over 50 modern jets. I'll tell you a secret: there is no much difference in terms of capabilities between the S-200 and S-300.

During the Gulf war, the coalition aviation was helped by Jordanians military who put bugs in Iraqi computer that happen to transit thru Jordan...It more than an Arab thing than a coalition force on steroid..And Israel too, has survived all these years , because she surrounded by Arabs..I would have been surprised if you were relocated in South America, as it was in the first choice of local for you, before Arabs invited you in..
Well, depending on the Russian seriousness , in letting the Syrian the free use of the S300 capabilities, the future will tell us certainly if the S200 and the S300 are the same...

 

[Foxtrot Delta]

Good thing is there systems are automated meaning manual control is very rare and are almost 24/7 ready to track and fire but GOD Damn 96 targets simultaneously !! kuch ziada ni ho gya?

May be they mean it can track 96 targets and enage lets say 20 of them perhaps?

 

[WinterNights]

I told you already that in gulf war coalition lost over 50 jets to more ancient systems. You dont know it since u are an ignorant.

That does not make your loss any less embarrassing nor theirs.

If you think that Assad with dozens of Buks and Pantsyrs did not use them to protect his long range systems then u are an imbecile.

There is no evidence of that at all. Either post proof or quiet down.

Fact that u can't answer properly. Both S-300V and S-200 have SAHR guidance, both have over 2000 m/s max speed. Range and warhead of S-200 is even higher.

You are obviously mentally handicapped. S-300 has much more advanced radar system, much more capable missiles in terms of seeker technology and manoeuvrability. It's not just about range of missile. S-200 is much more suited to slower big targets and is very prone to jamming etc. Your pilots were just too retarded and got shot down by it.

Anyone that believes the PMU2 is not more capable than the relic s-200 needs serious mental attention. Go get some haloperidol kid, maybe that would make the retarded voices in your head stop.

 

[500]

That does not make your loss any less embarrassing nor theirs.

Wow, some anonymous thinks he know better than leading air forces commanders in the world. Another proof u are an imbecile.

There is no evidence of that at all. Either post proof or quiet down.

So these dozens of Buks and Pantsyrs are in Syria just for fun? U obviously are an imbecile.

You are obviously mentally handicapped. S-300 has much more advanced radar system, much more capable missiles in terms of seeker technology and manoeuvrability. It's not just about range of missile. S-200 is much more suited to slower big targets and is very prone to jamming etc. Your pilots were just too retarded and got shot down by it.

Anyone that believes the PMU2 is not more capable than the relic s-200 needs serious mental attention. Go get some haloperidol kid, maybe that would make the retarded voices in your head stop.

Just random words. What makes u think that SAHR of S-200 is more prone to jamming than SAHR of S-300? Can you prove it?