What's new

Russia getting angry at China for copying there military hardware

Status
Not open for further replies.
People saying that the JF-17 is a copy of the MiG-33 seriously need glasses.
 
.
People saying that the JF-17 is a copy of the MiG-33 seriously need glasses.

when some uneducated indians going desperate they'd come up anything``those people even believe india can 'indeginously' make 3rd gen plane (they cant even produce reliable 5.56mm and 5.45mm caliber rounds) so no common sense and reality can get through their funny brains`

and on top of that all the planes look the sames in their naked eyes except their super doper mirage and SAAB copy of LCA

---------- Post added at 10:17 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:15 PM ----------

Nokia N-8 cost around 22000 Rupees and China copied version about 4500 Rupees with more features than original like two or 4 sim slots. 2 memory slots......does it make better than original one, a big NOOOO for it. because it was made in China. all the best..............

and the reason is poor indians cannot afford expensive made in china products``fact
 
.
I thought I made this clear. The FC-1 is not a copy of mig-33 design. Completely different. The Mig-33 was suppose to be a redesign of the mig-29 with a single engine. The fc-1 OTOH is losely based on the j-7. j-10 evolved from the j-9 which itself evolved from the j-7. j-10 unlike the fc-1 uses more modern production methods. heck the fc-1s fbw software is written in C+!
fyi the LCA has nothing to do with mirage 2000.
 
.
i love how the "copies" all look better than the originals! all beautiful planes indeed. i can't wait for these magnificients bird to fly over india, that'll make their migs drop out of the sky even faster! :whistle:

I love how they dont though... The copied air-frame is there, but the Russian technology can't be replaced by your local crap.
 
.
I love how they dont though... The copied air-frame is there, but the Russian technology can't be replaced by your local crap.

everything except the russian engines are already being replaced. the only thing not crap about russian technology is their engines :whistle: but even that is soon to be replaced LOL don't worry, indians will buy your sh*t
 
.
dont make ur defending argument point with common sense, see through their accusation, its based on the plane looking and stereotype against China, while they themselves r in a amazing position, which is they r still making sh!t weapons, not to mention u will always find their products resembles of other decades ago products made by european , so, by all means, for god sake, just troll them.
 
. .
everything except the russian engines are already being replaced. the only thing not crap about russian technology is their engines :whistle: but even that is soon to be replaced LOL don't worry, indians will buy your sh*t

The engine was replaced for J-11B as well, meanwhile J-11A was produced under license.
 
.
everything except the russian engines are already being replaced. the only thing not crap about russian technology is their engines :whistle: but even that is soon to be replaced LOL don't worry, indians will buy your sh*t

Wrong, your Nuclear Submarine technology is still crap compared to Russias, your bomber technology is still crap compared to Russias, your transport helicopter technology is still crap compared to Russias, your heavy cargo plane technology is still crap compared Russias, your surface-to-air missile technology is still crap compared to Russias, your attack helicopter technology is still crap compared to Russias, your Torpedo technology is still crap compared to Russias.

Your welcome to prove me wrong on everything I said above , if your going to respond with insults or BS clams without sources to back it up, don't bother responding back troll.:wave:
 
.
Wrong, your Nuclear Submarine technology is still crap compared to Russias, your bomber technology is still crap compared to Russias, your transport helicopter technology is still crap compared to Russias, your heavy cargo plane technology is still crap compared Russias, your surface-to-air missile technology is still crap compared to Russias, your attack helicopter technology is still crap compared to Russias, your Torpedo technology is still crap compared to Russias.

Your welcome to prove me wrong on everything I said above , if your going to respond with insults or BS clams without sources to back it up, don't bother responding back troll.:wave:

sorry buddy, keep your russian crap for the indians :wave:

if your stuff wasn't crap we wouldn't need to "copy" and make our own improved versions. it must be hard on you russians. 1st loosing the tech race to the US and now about to lose it to china LOL you better get your game on or else india is about to have technological superiority over you guys too! ouch:lol:
 
.
The J-11 is Su-27. Is that crap? Your j-10 are largely powered by Russian crap? Your transport fleet? Or ukranian. Truth is, weather China likes it or not, they are still reliant on Russia or the former Soviet Union states for weapons. S-300 missiles etc...
 
.
The J-11 is Su-27. Is that crap? Your j-10 are largely powered by Russian crap? Your transport fleet? Or ukranian. Truth is, weather China likes it or not, they are still reliant on Russia or the former Soviet Union states for weapons. S-300 missiles etc...

yea their stuff is crap, that's why we had to "copy" and make our own version. don't get it wrong though, there are some stuff they make that are still up to standards, thats why we keep it. truth is, russia isn't what they used to be. after the cold war with the US they were never the same lol
 
.
sorry buddy, keep your russian crap for the indians :wave:

if your stuff wasn't crap we wouldn't need to "copy" and make our own improved versions. it must be hard on you russians. 1st loosing the tech race to the US and now about to lose it to china LOL you better get your game on or else india is about to have technological superiority over you guys too! ouch:lol:

Is that the reason only small and poor countries those cant afford real machines trying for your improved systems?? :lol:

Let leave others even Pakistan bought JF17 with soft loan, and still waiting for old and used F16s :lol:
 
.
yea their stuff is crap, that's why we had to "copy" and make our own version. don't get it wrong though, there are some stuff they make that are still up to standards, thats why we keep it. truth is, russia isn't what they used to be. after the cold war with the US they were never the same lol
You copy it? no you purchased it and then domestically built it. Russian military exports fair well against Western equipment but your basically called their defence industry crap. I'd say its far from the truth. The Russians are still ahead of China and still sell to China. Imagine how much they made off the Su-27's produced in China and the royalties. China has more flankers than India btw and many more S-300 systems and their domestic variants.
 
.
sorry buddy, keep your russian crap for the indians :wave:

The only crap here is the one coming out of your mouth, I can back up my clams with facts, something thats impossible for you, because you are a failed troll.:rofl:

if your stuff wasn't crap we wouldn't need to "copy

NEWS-FLASH, You copy Russia's weapons because you need too, becasue if you didn't you still be decades behind Russia in every aspect got it :woot:

and make our own improved versions.

Copying weopons and making improvements on it is a standard practice , for example when the USSR coped the Rolls-Royce Nene engine into the Klimov VK-1 it improved the trust from 5,000 lbf to 5,955 lbf. The same case with AIM-9 missile.

it must be hard on you russians.

It must be really hard on you for being so clueless:lol:

1st loosing the tech race to the US and now about to lose it to china LOL you better get your game on or else india is about to have technological superiority over you guys too! ouch:lol

LOL your stupidity has no bounds does it:eek:
 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom