What's new

Russia & China to challenge NATO

Cats dream of Rats.

Block!....wrong choice of word.

Russia alone can deter NATO as far as his areas of Interests in Europe are concerned.

China has nothing to offer, is a US dependent economy which may refuse to help Russia at the times of acute need, on US call.

hahaha russia?lol what happened in georgia?if any country attacks us it invades it and holds it and fight till tier humiliating defeat russia is nothin if it was it could hav its influence on poland on ukarine russia is like a toothless shark after what pakistan did to it durning soviet afghan war
 
.
China has nothing to offer, is a US dependent economy which may refuse to help Russia at the times of acute need, on US call.
How is China dependent on the US when US account for less than 30% of China's external trade and continues to shrink in marketshare for Chinese goods? When US owe China a trillion dollar? When the EU turn to China to bailout Greece?

Let's be realistic, China know US is not going to recover to pre-collapse level. no doubt China do will want to earn USD, American just don't have the stomach for more debt.

Saying China is dependent on the US is like saying Russia is dependent on EU because 30% of their energy export goes to Europe, producers is not at the mercy of the consumer, especially when the consumer is broke.



This is not a battle of military or economy, this is a battle of word, a battle for public opinion... this is a contest between pro-war and anti-war factions, i seriously doubt either US, EU, Russia or China will confront each other directly over what is essentially an opinion difference...

we shall see what happens when the conflict expands into other middleeast state like syria and saudi, and see if NATO still have the stomach to "peacekeep"...



lol what happened in georgia?
the russian won and took all the US equipment in georgian army as war booty?
:flame:
 
. . .
Hasn't this been going on for quite a while? I mean Russia and China have always tried to be the NATO counter for no reason. NATO is a powerless agency now that the cold war is over. It only exists for Europe's safety. For US, it is just additional cannon fodder to contribute.
 
.
How is China dependent on the US when US account for less than 30% of China's external trade and continues to shrink in marketshare for Chinese goods? When US owe China a trillion dollar? When the EU turn to China to bailout Greece?

Let's be realistic, China know US is not going to recover to pre-collapse level. no doubt China do will want to earn USD, American just don't have the stomach for more debt.

Saying China is dependent on the US is like saying Russia is dependent on EU because 30% of their energy export goes to Europe, producers is not at the mercy of the consumer, especially when the consumer is broke.



This is not a battle of military or economy, this is a battle of word, a battle for public opinion... this is a contest between pro-war and anti-war factions, i seriously doubt either US, EU, Russia or China will confront each other directly over what is essentially an opinion difference...

we shall see what happens when the conflict expands into other middleeast state like syria and saudi, and see if NATO still have the stomach to "peacekeep"...



the russian won and took all the US equipment in georgian army as war booty?
:flame:

On a tiny deserted island, a boat crashes with 3 asians and 1 white. the asians, wanting to maximize the survival of all, go out and collect wood, fruits, sticks, make fire, kill animals, and make shelter. the white man only eats. when the asians ask him, what do you contribute, he says, i watch the camp at night against criminals. i am also the sole contributor to economic growth on the island. without me, where will you give your food, wood, and shelter to?
 
.
Hasn't this been going on for quite a while? I mean Russia and China have always tried to be the NATO counter for no reason. NATO is a powerless agency now that the cold war is over. It only exists for Europe's safety. For US, it is just additional cannon fodder to contribute.
HAHAHA US HAS TO PAY CHINA 3 TRILLION IN DEBT ONLY.AND EVEN CHINA SUPPLIES THEM WITH TOILET PAPER.THE DAY CHINA DECIDES NOT TO TRADE IN DOLLARS THE SAME DAY OBAMA WILL BE BEGGING ON THE STREETS
 
. .
Also time for Pakisan to exit from the non-Nato Ally Status. There has been no benefit for Pakistan in this. Improving our relations with Central Asian States, Russia, Iran and other countires closer to us.

We should also keep realtions with the US and EU, but our relations with closer countries should be improved upon.
 
. .
oh absolutely, which explains why Russia is taking part, you make perfect sense buddy

Russia is also taking part in joint exercises with NATO and has an increasingly integrated economy with Europe, so yes it makes perfect sense thank you.
 
.
Russia is also taking part in joint exercises with NATO and has an increasingly integrated economy with Europe, so yes it makes perfect sense thank you.

china and Russia are cooperating strategically
Russia is doing business with the EU so what? china is already very well integrate economically with the USA and EU(more so than Russia is) and if as you say they have absolutely no interest please do tell why they would bother to work with china? clearly there is something to gain
 
.
The five-day war with Georgia has shown the real balance of power on the Eurasian continent. Trained on the model of the NATO Georgian army was destroyed by Russian forces a few days. Fast victory for Russia in the war revealed the impotence of NATO near Russian borders.
 
.
Lol, Russia is the first World Superpower, and we are a third World sh!thole, so let the bear to challenge Nato alone.

We prefer to stick to improve our living standard and our infrastructure.
 
.
The five-day war with Georgia has shown the real balance of power on the Eurasian continent. Trained on the model of the NATO Georgian army was destroyed by Russian forces a few days. Fast victory for Russia in the war revealed the impotence of NATO near Russian borders.


Please... That's like the Americans saying that NATO doctrine is superior because they beat the soviet model Iraqi army twice... None of those two wars had any chance of turning out differently.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom