Project 627
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 9, 2011
- Messages
- 327
- Reaction score
- 0
The range, penetration aids, and warheads of Russian ICBMs are not more advanced than that of China's. Read up on DF-41 and JL-2. You'll get quite a surprise.
China is also building a stealth strategic bomber. It will be a flying wing similar to that of the B-2A.
In terms of submarines, I really wonder how the report got the specifications on the Type 095, BEFORE it is even built? That makes the report partially BS. It was speculated that the Type 095 would feature vertically launched cruise missiles and possibly pump jet propulsion, which could put it as quiet as the French Barracuda SSN. China is also reported to be building the Type 096 SSBN, with 24 SLBMs.
The S-500 does not have the ability to intercept ballistic missiles from midcourse stage, whereas China's KT series missiles can. Currently only the US and China have proved to be able to intercept ballistic missiles during its midcourse stage.
1. Sorry to spoil your fun, but no ICBM is advanced as Topol-M and RS-24 so please stop the BS.
2. PAK DA will be a Stealth bomber as capable or more then any flying wing craft, and unlike some people the Russian don't need to copy US ideas to build a stealth aircraft.
3. LOL do you deny that the Yasen class and Borei class is light years ahead compared to the Type 95 when it comes to quietness, and the Yesen even beats the Virginia class when it comes down to automation of systems because the Yasen crew 90 vs 134 crew for Virgina.
4. There is a lot of evidence that the Russians are working on a much more advanced version of the Gazelle, so don't think you have a lead over anti-ballistic missiles interceptors because you don't.
Last edited by a moderator: