Let me tell you, during the cold war, there were two superpowers, the US and Soviet Union(not Russia in your case).
After the fall of the Soviet Union there is left with one sole superpower.
That is the US.
Why is it so hard for you to understand? and yet you laugh?
I never contested the history of US and Soviet Union cold war era, instead I laugh at the way you presented US as a superpower and on the basis of that your presented the US supremacy in terms of Military, Economic strength and Political Influence and following conclusion where you easily derided the supremacy of Russia, India and China, without even knowing the foreign policies of these countries.
You had presented the status of US supremacy in such way that US would do anything whatever relaying on their superpower status to fulfill their object of containing Russian and China, and use India as marionette to contain China.
So inotherwords, when you can't argue logically, you bring up words, such as "fantasy", "foolish claims" and "remedy". OK, are there any more words you want to blabber on before you can give me an concrete answer?
The question of arguing logically doesnt arises, as far as your presentation of US status is concerned. Since what you had presume that US supremacy would be enough to accomplish whatever there elementary objectives they had to realize. If you had awake about the foreign policies of other countries then you hadnt even chatter about containment of Russia and Use of India to contain china.
Nobody is calling you inferrior, so I have no idea what your crying about. Admitting a claim is not inferior, making a stupid claim is, which happens to be this.
Use of word Inferiority was only to express my dignity to readily accept whatever my fault that you have highlighted.
During the cold war, Russia ALONE showed the world.
May be this should be sound you foolish, but there is reason for making such claim. Since in my lifetime, as far as my memory goes ,whatever I have read, come across or anything for that matter about Soviet Union, my claim definitely proved to be wise to some extent. As during the Cold war, Soviet Union was all alone in front of US and its NATO Allies in terms of Military, Political Infulence or Economic status. Since even Soviet did play role of containing US and NATO allies, but the countries with whom Soviets were playing game of containment were too weak to exert any kind of credible influence over US and its allies. In contrast, US and its allies mainly consist of some of the affluent countries from Europe, Arab , Australia as well as Japan and some East Asian countries. In other words it can be concluded that Soviets were all alone without anykind of external help, but still they manage to exert immense presseure on US and allies. Unfortunetly on economic front US manage to outrun Soviets.
If am wrong, then pls correct.
Remedy again? hmmm, why can't you just keep it simple and say that you have made a stupid claim instead of bringing up excuses like a remedy?
It is not an excuses man, it is an kind of explanation to counter youre amplification of US super status and associated hyperboles regarding India, Russia, China
"India need US to counter China"
This is a reasonable and logical claim. How exactly is this childish? please explain.
Off course! it may be reasonable and logical, but excuse me it is only proved to be valid in terms of US Point of view. In India, as far as I know about my country regarding its Foreign and Domestic policies, Political Affairs as well as Social and Economic Background, your reasonable so called logical claim fall flat, your claim simply doesnt hold any water.
You really think you can counter China by yourself?
Definitely! Since our history speaks for itself, several eventualities have inflicted on us, then only we never felt the need of any kind of external help. We hold our shoulder high in any kind of hostile environment. And hence we perceived our foreign policy of Non-alignment. Only those countries perceive the policy of Non-alignment which had endure a very hard time in the past and present and still manage to maintain its head high.
if your answer is YES, then please do tell me exactly how India is going to do this.
Through our Resilience and devotion in terms of Economic Strength, Military formidability and astounding Political influence . You may be citing the event of 1962 Indo-china war to substantiate your claim of vitality of Indias need of US help, but pls get yourself aware about during this War India call for help from all the world including your US, but no one came to help including your US.
At that point of time we met with humiliated defeat, but we felt no regret for that and learnt very hard lesson, You know what lesson we learned, it is fighting of any kind of eventualities on our own wheatear it is in terms of Military Warfare or Economic Crisis. And hence for that matter we devoted our selves to the likes of Constructive Social and economic building of our nation, constant Military build up to deter anykind of adversaries as well as Quality Domestic & Political influence.
If you cannot, JUST SAY YOU CAN'T instead of throwing yourself into a girly tantrum and resolve to attacks and pretty words like REMEDY, CHILDISH etc.
When someone like you cant answer my simple question of What you know about Indias foreign policy, and instead engage with me to substantiate his painful emotions as I had spoiled, then How do you expect me you rhetoric Blackstone to come up with favorable response?.
That's real nice, inotherwords you don't know the answer to my question.
Just say the following, it makes life so much more easier....
I DON'T HAVE THE ANSWER.
So annoyed huh! Did I mention the name of countries that doesnt suits with US formidability and its merits?
What is your obsession with emotions and sentiments? didn't I say your not hurting my sentiments? or did you not read my posts properly.
Inspite of repated remainder, the person who cant answer my simple question about Indian foreign policy, instead choose to come up with his wounded and painful emotional feelings and sentiments, so what you should expect from me?
As I know, your the one throwing into girly tantrums and personal attacks.
In fact those were deserving reply to someone like you.
Didnt you quoted me moronic in your previous post?
So what you exactly expect me in reply to this?
Do you expected me to wreath you as sympathy for your emotional state of psyche?.
