RSS: No need for secularism in India; colour of flag should be turned saffron as tricolour injects c

[danger007]

ok enough nonsense. .. we are making fun of our selfs here... lolz get back to daily works..

 

[Tridibans]

So why would people not attend his funeral? when people can support 2002 because of Godra riot? When people can become CM and become leader after rioting? When riot killers can rule Mahharastra, why wouldnt one who took revenge people can not attend funeral? Why Rajiv Gandhi + Indira Gandhi killers should get state support?

Simple. In India we cherish our constitution and our Judiciary.

Our constitution says Modi is PM and our Judiciary says he is innocent. No question of not supporting him.

Our Judiciary says Yakub is a traitor and our Constitution says Judiciary/ Government has to be respected. No question of supporting this traitor whatever fellow anti nationals may feel....

 

[SarthakGanguly]

I just said slogans and verses...I don't remember exactly sort of Lord shiva is god of gods n all... .. i paid no attention... I have seen arguments between Iscan guy and another guy who praised lord Shiva....

Where did it preach supremacy of Krishna or etc etc over others? THAT is the point. I can say so and so is Great. But I won't say that so and so is GREATER THAN ALL OTHERS.

And these slaves are what we call today... 'Sickulars' and 'Adarsh Liberals' aka Sagarika or Mani Shankar.

Them and seculars and cowards hiding behind the garb of secularism. Err, the burqa of secularism.

 

[doublemaster]

Simple. In India we cherish our constitution and our Judiciary.

Our constitution says Modi is PM and our Judiciary says he is innocent. No question of not supporting him.

Our Judiciary says Yakub is a traitor and our Constitution says Judiciary/ Government has to be respected. No question of supporting this traitor whatever fellow anti nationals may feel....

How about Maya kodanni? babu Bajrangi? Sanjay Dutt? how about Rajiv and India killers?
We have judiciary even when Maharashtra communal rioters un-touched. We have Judciary and people have senses thats why they attended funeral. Simple.

 

[Tridibans]

How about Maya kodanni? babu Bajrangi? Sanjay Dutt? how about Rajiv and India killers?
We have judiciary even when Maharashtra communal rioters un-touched. We have Judciary and people have senses thats why they attended funeral. Simple.

Whoever is guilty is behind bars or is convicted. I am yet to find a source that says our judiciary asks for the persons religion before convicting him.

I will ask you one question... and please give me a frank answer. Before 2002, were there any communal riots in India? You know that in Gujarat, atleast 3 riots like 2002 had occurred before 2000-01?
What about Bhagalpur.... go back and then India-Pakistan partition roits....

Was Modi pm then? Or BJP orchestrated those riots in Naokhali (present day BD) or Direct action day in 1945?? The current narrative that anything communal is BJP/ Modi/ RSS is a congressi creation using the sate media and machinery during their decades of rule. If anything, under Modi, there has not been a single major riot after 2002 .... neither in Gujarat nor in India under his PM'ship.

 

[Soulspeek]

Somebody send those chaddis in Al-Raqqah for special neck massage. Monkeys are hell bent upon destroying India.

 

[ravi kiran]

There is nothing like good muslim or bad muslim. There are Indians and anti nationals. Most of the crowd in Yakub funeral were from outside Mumbai. I am a mumbaikar. I know what I am saying.

You can find these anti-nationals (who have heart filled hate for India and Hindus) in Mumbra/ Bhiwandi etc. They are brainwashed and are the first ones to enlist for Jihadists like ISIS or SIMI. You don't know this perhaps, but Mumbai is one of the most saffronised cities in India with Shiv Sena units everywhere. People who believe BJP is Hindutvawadi don't know what a Shiv Sainik is

brother i am from Pune. my sisters husband is Inspector in Mumbai police. I know very much.

 

[doublemaster]

Whoever is guilty is behind bars or is convicted. I am yet to find a source that says our judiciary asks for the persons religion before convicting him.

I will ask you one question... and please give me a frank answer. Before 2002, were there any communal riots in India? You know that in Gujarat, atleast 3 riots like 2002 had occurred before 2000-01?
What about Bhagalpur.... go back and then India-Pakistan partition roits....

Was Modi pm then? Or BJP orchestrated those riots in Naokhali (present day BD) or Direct action day in 1945?? The current narrative that anything communal is BJP/ Modi/ RSS is a congressi creation using the sate media and machinery during their decades of rule. If anything, under Modi, there has not been a single major riot after 2002 .... neither in Gujarat nor in India under his PM'ship.

Gulty is behind the bars? Thats the problem. Maya and bajrangi government do not want them to be in jail, neither government asking them for death penalty. Once side you are trying some people under MOCA, TADA keeping them in jail for years and trying under strict laws where confession of co-accused also can be witness. Another side you form a toothless SIT and try under loose. After all this you make Rajiv and India Killers Hero's and states come out in open to support them. After all these You dont like people not to attend yakub funeral.

Yes there were riots, Every major riot Sanghis hand is more visible. Wasnt there any riot under congress? Yes there were..They are the reason today sanghis enjoying power. Who are congress members? After all they are too Hindus. If they were really seculars people like Takre, TOgadia wouldnt be enjoying power today. They were sickulars. Many times i am happy about their fate today. They allowed Sanghis to grow.

Sikhs can not forget 1984 until justice is delivered. Same way 2002 also will be there.Sikhs are still unhappy even after a sikh is made a PM. Also congress never has official anti-sikh view. It was one time incident and after that they allowed sikhs to dominate every field. But where as BJP its official policy is to divide.

 

[Tridibans]

Gulty is behind the bars? Thats the problem. Maya and bajrangi government do not want them to be in jail, neither government asking them for death penalty. Once side you are trying some people under MOCA, TADA keeping them in jail for years and trying under strict laws where confession of co-accused also can be witness. Another side you form a toothless SIT and try under loose. After all this you make Rajiv and India Killers Hero's and states come out in open to support them. After all these You dont like people not to attend yakub funeral.

Yes there were riots, Every major riot Sanghis hand is more visible. Wasnt there any riot under congress? Yes there were..They are the reason today sanghis enjoying power. Who are congress members? After all they are too Hindus. If they were really seculars people like Takre, TOgadia wouldnt be enjoying power today. They were sickulars. Many times i am happy about their fate today. They allowed Sanghis to grow.

Sikhs can not forget 1984 until justice is delivered. Same way 2002 also will be there.Sikhs are still unhappy even after a sikh is made a PM. Also congress never has official anti-sikh view. It was one time incident and after that they allowed sikhs to dominate every field. But where as BJP its official policy is to divide.

So overall.... what I get from you post is Hindus are responsible for riots. be it Congress or BJP, end of the day its the evil Hindus.

But I don't see Muslims living peacefully where there are ZERO Hindus either

I mean look at Syria, Chechniya, Iraq, hell look at Pakistan.... daily Muslims are killed in Mosque bombings. Are RSS ohh sorry... I meant Hindus resposnible for that too?

 

[Whazzup]

Pakistan is not our enemy. Our enemy are ourselves.

This line is wrong they are enemy and they will remain our eternal enemy as long as there will be Muslims on our land , there will always be enmity between India and Pakistan (a country tailor made for Muslims ) , Indian Muslims are an asset for Pakistanis bcoz they know deep down inside most of them support that old Sultanate time era .

@ranjeet remember when I said our Seculars are just anti Majority ? Just see how they react towards RSS but meanwhile these Evangelist roam unopposed.

 

[ravi kiran]

and why do you have problem with saffron flag? for thousands of years our flag is saffron colored. then what is wrong if we want that to continue?

@Slav Defence what is wrong in this post? why negative rating?

 

[SipahSalar]

People voted for RSS, so i guess they have the right to carry out what they want. I want to see how far they go )

 

[peacekeeper]

No insertion of secularism does not prevent erosion of religious freedom. If that was so Hindu temples would not be under govt control. If that was so, Hindu temples funds would not be squandered on repairing and maintaining Christian churches and Muslim mosques. If that was not so all Hindu religious festivals would not be under attack by seculars day in and day out as happens in India.

If that was not so, Christian and Muslim schools and colleges wont have tax exemptions and Hindu schools and colleges penalized and criminalized.

That you make these naive assumptions that secularism has upheld religious freedom in India despite the time you have spent on this forum says you are a lost case. A born fool and destined to remain one forever.

Well, on various instances money has been spent on Ashrams or temple, like in the form of free or subsidised land. You are making a wrong assertion that money has been reappropriated from temples to mosques.

 

[jamahir]

so when is nato invading india to install democracy??

and i agree with rss... secularism isn't a concept from 900 bc india... it was preached at some level by buddha, then by alexander's greeks, then by the cultural changes they left behind, then by later in-comers, then by arrival of modern socialism/communism.

People voted for RSS, so i guess they have the right to carry out what they want. I want to see how far they go )

there is a significant number which didn't vote for bjp and doesn't like worshiping modi... there is yet another section of the progressives who struggle on despite the goons of the sangh parivar... please do not insult them.

I mean look at Syria, Chechniya, Iraq

when you don't know about the world, it is better to learn than open your half-baked knowledge out of some engineering college in bangalore or poona.

 

[haviZsultan]

The allegation that money from Hindu temples is being taken and being spent on muslim mosques is not only wrong, but also a deliberate attempt to paint a picture of Hindus as an oppressed majority in their own land. I still have to find a case where a majority is oppressed by a minuscule minority. The allegation is not only untrue but also supported by Hindutva fanatics of all types. Their agenda is to prove muslims have special rights to take what limited rights they already have. By this they want to establish a Hindu rashtra in our own land. No muslim would allow that. Hindus want to be our brothers and respect us-fine. Oppress us-no