What's new

RS bill now allows arrested people to fight elections in India

Enemy

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Sep 3, 2012
Messages
1,666
Reaction score
0
Rajya Sabha passes bill allowing arrested people to fight elections

New Delhi: Taking a step towards negating a Supreme Court order, Rajya Sabha on Tuesday passed a bill to amend the Representation of People Act to allow a person in police custody to file nomination to fight an election.

Moving the amendments, Law Minister Kapil Sibal said the apex court judgement was 'clearly erroneous' and advised the judiciary to be "extremely careful" in giving rulings which have an impact on the polity of the country.

The Representation of the People (Amendment and Validation) Bill, 2013, which was passed by the House, seeks to add a proviso to sub-section (2) of section 62 of the RP Act to state that a person cannot cease to be a voter while in detention as his or her right is only temporarily suspended.

One of the amendments states that as the name of the jailed person continues to be on the electoral rolls, he or she also continues to be an elector and can file nomination for an election.

"Provided further that by reason of the prohibition to vote under this sub-section, a person whose name has been entered in the electoral roll shall not cease to be an elector," the proviso reads.

The amendments seek to negate the July 10 order of the Supreme Court which said all those in jail cannot vote as per RP Act and hence cannot qualify for contesting elections to Parliament or state legislatures.

The amendment, once passed by Parliament, shall come into effect from July 10, 2013, the day the Supreme Court gave the judgement.

Speaking on the bill, Sibal said there is a general "negative perception" in the country that all politicians are criminals. "Courts are enthusiastic to prove us so, even if we are not so," he said.
Winding up the debate on the bill, Sibal said, "I dare say, in another environment, we perhaps would not get such a judgement. The environment is that political class is being looked upon with suspicion."

"We are fallible, we commit mistakes and the judges can also commit mistakes. The judiciary should be extremely careful while giving judgements which can affect the polity of the country," he said.

Sibal's remark drew mixed response from the parties with Ravi Shankar Prasad (BJP) asking him to show respect towards the judiciary and SP members including Naresh Agrawal fully backing him on it.

"I have greatest respect for the judiciary and that is why we never make adverse comments against any judge or court," Sibal said in response to Prasad's remarks.

After examining the Supreme Court order, government had filed a review petition, but instead of waiting for the outcome, it felt the need to "suitably" address the situation, the Statement of Objects and Reasons of the bill states.

In its verdict the apex court had ruled that only an "elector" can contest the polls and he/she ceases the right to cast vote due to confinement in prison or being in custody of police.

The court had, however, made it clear that disqualification would not be applicable to persons subjected to preventive detention under any law.
 
There was a report in the past that half of Indian parliament has criminals as elected so yeh good that arrested can stand for elections too
 
There was a report in the past that half of Indian parliament has criminals as elected so yeh good that arrested can stand for elections too

Now there will be full of criminals who will govern India staying behind bars.
 
I think no parties opposed this reform :angel:
 
Bharat Nirman phe hai hak mera

Well done Congress & other Political goons
 
I think no parties opposed this reform :angel:

I have seen only two times our messed up politicians pass something without a fight .

1. Increase their salary and perks .

2. Allowing criminals among themselves to contest elections .


:hitwall::hitwall::hitwall::hitwall:
 
The bill did the right thing, you cannot stop somebody from contesting just because he got charges. I have no faith in police system, who can be bought.
Only convicted criminal should be barred from contesting when they are serving term.
 
Oh well.. just goes to show there is no real difference in ideology between any of the political parties. Difference of opinion arises only when there is something good to be done for ordinary people. When it comes to things like Office of profit or keeping political parties out of RTI ambit or change in people's representation act to accommodate goons, every political party seems to be in the same wavelength. Sad story....
 
Back
Top Bottom