What's new

Roustom 2 : Endurance Test Successful

Official PAF source? You are quoting a Dawn article.
Let me know ..to which fact do you want a source too?

Dawn quoted the PAF. Be great to get a source on your claim of

"Pakistan first scrambled 2 mirages and 4 F-7 but they were unable to locate these UAVs.

Finally F-16s were scrambled from Chaklala ..which was able to shoot down 1 of the UAVs around 2300 hrs using aim 9L missile...the second one escaped. "

Sounds like fiction, but I am sure you have a reliable source, I'll wait....
 
Dawn quoted the PAF. Be great to get a source on your claim of

"Pakistan first scrambled 2 mirages and 4 F-7 but they were unable to locate these UAVs.

Finally F-16s were scrambled from Chaklala ..which was able to shoot down 1 of the UAVs around 2300 hrs using aim 9L missile...the second one escaped. "

Sounds like fiction, but I am sure you have a reliable source, I'll wait....

IAF's Searcher-II Loss on June 07, 2002

In a year that saw India-Pakistan peacetime tensions soar to an all-time high, it was not unusual for the respective militaries to send Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) on spying missions into each others' airspace. Kept away from the public eye, only some of these missions would be known to the media; and that too only if governments wished to derive some political or rhetorical mileage.​

Occasionally, these drones would be detected and be defended against by all possible means. For their operators the price of intelligence was too high compared to the potential loss of a UAV. In one such operation on Friday 7th June 2002, two IAF Searcher-IIs penetrated Pakistani air space at low level near Lahore. In response two Mirages and four F-7Ps were scrambled from Rafique which failed to detect the small, slow moving aircraft. Another pair of F-16s took off from Kamra and were able to down one Searcher [S/N 'T-2004']; thus achieving a rare air-to-air kill of a drone at night.

The PAF claimed that the intruding aircraft was shot down at 2300 Hrs; its wreckage recovered at the Dogran Kalan village (close to Raja Jang town) south-west of Lahore, which is the capital of Pakistan's Punjab province. The victim had taken off from an airfield in Jammu.


The interception was carried out by a PAF F-16B [S/N '82-605'] Falcon flown by Sqn Ldr Zulfiqar at 13,000 ft. ACM Mir's statement; "The UAV was spotted by the mobile observation units when it crossed into Pakistani territory and was immediately gunned down" substantiates that the intruder was not detected by a radar. The wreckage photos show the remains of a AIM-9L Sidewinder AAM, probably the one which downed the UAV. AIM-9L is the more sophisticated than the AIM-9P version of the missile, which is also in service with the PAF.

Searcher-II has an endurance of 14 hours and venture out for 250 Km from the base; it can climb up to an altitude of 16,000 Ft (4875 m).

It is not known to what degree it fulfilled its mission but the depth of interception was significant considering that Pakistan's Air Defence Net is strongest in Punjab.

Neither is it known what pattern the Aircraft flew over Pakistan and for how long; but still it would be a mistake to take Dogran Kalan's straight distance from the International Border at Punjab as the measure of intrusion since the mission started from Jammu and/or the route taken could have been circuitous.


For Pakistan, the detection of the spy plane and its interception was projected as a proof of capability of their air defence network; even though the same can be viewed as a serious bungling judging by the distance it traveled into Pakistan.

At a press conference held at PAF Chakala on June 10, Then PAF Chief of Air Staff ACM Mushaff Ali Mir made wild allegations of direct involvement of Israeli personnel in the mission, based on the fact that it supposedly did not have any Indian markings. He also felt that the aircraft was inducted only a few months back in a "hurry". In any case, none of the publicly available pictures of IAF Searchers show any conventional IAF markings such as Roundels and Fin Flash, except for the serial number.

The PAF went as far as to say that they would study the wreckage extensively in order to further their grasp of the technology, which would correspondingly give them a "leap of 8-10 years".

Indian external affairs officials admitted losing contact with a UAV in that region, but described it as a routine matter. In a statement issued to the Indian Parliament on 18 July 2002 then Indian Raksha Mantri (Defence Minister) George Fernandes acknowledged the UAV being "shot down by a Pakistan Air Force aircraft" .

 
The world is so jealous of Rou

army-3(2).jpg

I agree ....you won this one... we'll just have to reconcile to ground reality. You keep Mig 21. We'll keep Kashmir....
 
I agree ....you won this one... we'll just have to reconcile to ground reality. You keep Mig 21. We'll keep Kashmir....

Translation " you win wars where men fight like men we keep oppressing ordinary people against their wish of freedom"
 
or 'when I lose the war I will console myself by talking big and reflecitng upon the little battles i won'

No - its just what i said. Win wars or not you are oppressing people there - if there is hell you are going there for supporting it.
 
IAF's Searcher-II Loss on June 07, 2002

In a year that saw India-Pakistan peacetime tensions soar to an all-time high, it was not unusual for the respective militaries to send Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) on spying missions into each others' airspace. Kept away from the public eye, only some of these missions would be known to the media; and that too only if governments wished to derive some political or rhetorical mileage.​

Occasionally, these drones would be detected and be defended against by all possible means. For their operators the price of intelligence was too high compared to the potential loss of a UAV. In one such operation on Friday 7th June 2002, two IAF Searcher-IIs penetrated Pakistani air space at low level near Lahore. In response two Mirages and four F-7Ps were scrambled from Rafique which failed to detect the small, slow moving aircraft. Another pair of F-16s took off from Kamra and were able to down one Searcher [S/N 'T-2004']; thus achieving a rare air-to-air kill of a drone at night.

The PAF claimed that the intruding aircraft was shot down at 2300 Hrs; its wreckage recovered at the Dogran Kalan village (close to Raja Jang town) south-west of Lahore, which is the capital of Pakistan's Punjab province. The victim had taken off from an airfield in Jammu.


The interception was carried out by a PAF F-16B [S/N '82-605'] Falcon flown by Sqn Ldr Zulfiqar at 13,000 ft. ACM Mir's statement; "The UAV was spotted by the mobile observation units when it crossed into Pakistani territory and was immediately gunned down" substantiates that the intruder was not detected by a radar. The wreckage photos show the remains of a AIM-9L Sidewinder AAM, probably the one which downed the UAV. AIM-9L is the more sophisticated than the AIM-9P version of the missile, which is also in service with the PAF.

Searcher-II has an endurance of 14 hours and venture out for 250 Km from the base; it can climb up to an altitude of 16,000 Ft (4875 m).

It is not known to what degree it fulfilled its mission but the depth of interception was significant considering that Pakistan's Air Defence Net is strongest in Punjab.

Neither is it known what pattern the Aircraft flew over Pakistan and for how long; but still it would be a mistake to take Dogran Kalan's straight distance from the International Border at Punjab as the measure of intrusion since the mission started from Jammu and/or the route taken could have been circuitous.


For Pakistan, the detection of the spy plane and its interception was projected as a proof of capability of their air defence network; even though the same can be viewed as a serious bungling judging by the distance it traveled into Pakistan.

At a press conference held at PAF Chakala on June 10, Then PAF Chief of Air Staff ACM Mushaff Ali Mir made wild allegations of direct involvement of Israeli personnel in the mission, based on the fact that it supposedly did not have any Indian markings. He also felt that the aircraft was inducted only a few months back in a "hurry". In any case, none of the publicly available pictures of IAF Searchers show any conventional IAF markings such as Roundels and Fin Flash, except for the serial number.

The PAF went as far as to say that they would study the wreckage extensively in order to further their grasp of the technology, which would correspondingly give them a "leap of 8-10 years".

Indian external affairs officials admitted losing contact with a UAV in that region, but described it as a routine matter. In a statement issued to the Indian Parliament on 18 July 2002 then Indian Raksha Mantri (Defence Minister) George Fernandes acknowledged the UAV being "shot down by a Pakistan Air Force aircraft" .


I am really confused now, you said the mission gained information far in excess of the worth of the shot down UAV, but the very source you posted to back up your claim states

" It is not known to what degree it fulfilled its mission but the depth of interception was significant considering that Pakistan's Air Defence Net is strongest in Punjab. "

You are aware you just posted something that actually totally contradicts your argument right?
 
every track is favourite track.
:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:
This line is funny as hell.
Look what do we got here, an Indian calling world leading DJI crap.:disagree:

People like him can't even afford it even if it's displayed on the footpath, let alone Amazon. Indians like him, like to pretend something they are not.

Pretends to be this....

1602500594078.png


When he's actually this...

1602500677482.png
 
Last edited:
DRDO should incorporate "Modi technology" of water and oxygen extraction from air being pushed behind the propellers
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom