Rohingya repatriation: UN supervision needed

[BDforever]

We are wising up to all of that now As with everything in India, its slow...but it gets there .

Too bad, if you weren't like this even when you didn't need to be (and focus on improving your lot to be better quality people)....we could be much nicer to you regarding it when you actually desperately need it in future.

BD people do not think long term at all for some reason (hence why 1971 happened after just 20 or so years). Chanakya Dada didnt pay much attention assuming certain things after helping you on those short term feelz you had, but you prove those to be wrong, so here we are...MM Rohingya is just a small intro chapter of much more coming your way.

we are very cheeky, we know how to do it; we have proved it until now and will in future.

 

[Aung Zaya]

Good job to those countries. Love this part too:

"The non-binding measure " @Aung Zaya

Also info on those that abstained:

http://www.thecitizen.in/index.php/...bstains-From-Voting-on-UN-Rohingya-Resolution

Among the 26 countries which abstained along with India, were Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bhutan and Japan.

@Gibbs

as expected. just wonder syria chose to stand with Myanmar. really thank to 4 ASEAN members. we can now choose allies for future procedure.

Have you seen which countries get elected to human rights councils in UN? UN has zero credibility on pretty much anything.

good shot.bro they even remove the Suadi from blacklist just because of Fund.
https://www.google.com/search?hl=en...browser&q=un+remove+crime+of+suadi&gws_rd=ssl

US Rex Tillerson even said only individuals of MM military can be potentially sanctioned lol (after going there to meet, and avoiding BD all together even after you begged for him to come), not even the whole institution as a whole. Wow what a climbdown after all that drama you lot were clinging to in US policy hearings regarding military support for "invasion" blah blah.

he he. he even refused to use the term ' genocide ' after he met with Daw Aung San SU Kyi and SG Min Aung Hlaing.
Trump also do not even mentioned in both ASEAN meetings and UNSC. Host PH just mentioned in just one paragraph about this and call 'to end military operation' which was already done since last month. now even stand with us in UN. so it can call our diplomacy win , isnt it. ?

 

[TopCat]

as expected. just wonder syria chose to stand with Myanmar. really thank to 4 ASEAN members. we can now choose allies for future procedure.

good shot.bro they even remove the Suadi from blacklist just because of Fund.
https://www.google.com/search?hl=en...browser&q=un+remove+crime+of+suadi&gws_rd=ssl


he he. he even refused to use the term ' genocide ' after he met with Daw Aung San SU Kyi and SG Min Aung Hlaing.
Trump also do not even mentioned in both ASEAN meetings and UNSC. Host PH just mentioned in just one paragraph about this and call 'to end military operation' which was already done since last month. now even stand with us in UN. so it can call our diplomacy win , isnt it. ?

God blessed sanctions are on the way... Trump, trumped yet again.. LOL

 

[Aung Zaya]

God blessed sanctions are on the way... Trump, trumped yet again.. LOL

read this if u can.
US Rex Tillerson even said only individuals of MM military can be potentially sanctioned lol (after going there to meet, and avoiding BD all together even after you begged for him to come), not even the whole.

 

[TopCat]

read this if u can.
US Rex Tillerson even said only individuals of MM military can be potentially sanctioned lol (after going there to meet, and avoiding BD all together even after you begged for him to come), not even the whole.

Read, Rex Tellerson does not impose sanction but US congress does. Once it is done by congress, it will take ages before can be taken out. I can assure you to rest that until and unless you dont get out of the Chinese lap, your fate is sealed in the US congress, Rohingya or no Rohingya. Those people are nasty.

Tillerson was asked to go go MM and send a clear message.
If he needed to come to BD he will come. I dont think he has any business in Dhaka right at this moment when US congress and senate memebers are visiting.

 

[Banglar Bir]

12:00 AM, November 18, 2017 / LAST MODIFIED: 01:10 PM, November 18, 2017
EDITORIAL
UNGA resolution on Rohingya crisis
International community should harden its position

Rohingya children playfully slide down a sloping road at Balukhali refugee camp in Cox's Bazar yesterday. Photo: Reuters
It was long overdue, but we welcome the resolution adopted by the United Nations General Assembly, which condemned the military operations in Myanmar's Rakhine state against the Rohingya minority community.
The overwhelming support to the resolution, drafted by the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC), shows the international community's unified position on the Rohingya issue. The world community has sent a clear message to the Myanmar government that ethnic cleansing cannot continue under its nose, that the government must investigate the gross human rights violations, and that Rohingya refugees must return to their homeland with their full citizenship rights guaranteed.

We, however, regrettably note that ten countries including China and Russia opposed the resolution, and 26 others abstained. We are afraid such a position would perpetuate the violence against the very few Rohingyas that are left in Rakhine.

Despite the nearly unanimous position of the international community in opposing the military operations in Rakhine state, Myanmar's military regime shows no sign of heeding the advice that it should refrain from using excessive force. According to multiple media reports, gunfire was still heard and big flames were seen near Bangladesh-Myanmar border area only the day before yesterday.

However, the Myanmar army chief's, statement, very soon after the resolution was passed, that they would take only “real citizens” among those who had taken shelters in Bangladesh demonstrates the devious intention of the military. And this is what the international community must take cognisance of. It has raised serious questions over Myanmar's repatriation plans for the displaced Rohingyas.

We urge the international community to go beyond mere resolutions and act more decisively—especially with respect to the military—whose genocidal actions deserve more stringent measures against them.
http://www.thedailystar.net/editorial/unga-resolution-rohingya-crisis-1492780

 

[Gibbs]

Good job to those countries. Love this part too:

"The non-binding measure " @Aung Zaya

Also info on those that abstained:

http://www.thecitizen.in/index.php/...bstains-From-Voting-on-UN-Rohingya-Resolution

Among the 26 countries which abstained along with India, were Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bhutan and Japan.

@Gibbs

This is an internal issue of Myanmar.. All countries that either voted against or abstained have clearly indicated non interference in to a domestic problem of a sovereign nation.. Those who voted for have either religious dogma affiliated with that decision or those vying to gain a foothold in the region via influence.. In this case the US and the Western block to counteract China

Some even going against the narrative or the propaganda of religious affiliation is the ASEAN block.. I just returned from KL Malaysia, Talking to locals there as regards to Rohingya, It’s pretty evident why Indonesia, Malaysia and Brunei show such a lackluster attitude even though being Muslim majority nations, Not having high regards towards the Rohingya is quite a understatement.. Most of the words used to describe them were not too kind

As far as Bangladesh is concerned they’re obliged to safeguard thier kith and kin.. So you can’t fault the Bangladeshi position viz a viz their own people

 

[EastBengalPro]

As far as Bangladesh is concerned they’re obliged to safeguard thier kith and kin.. So you can’t fault the Bangladeshi position viz a viz their own people

Belonging to same religion and wearing same dresses doesn't make them Bangladeshis. They are living there for generations,they were recognized citizens before Army removed their citizenship in 1982,MPs had representation in the Parliament. Dont say foreigners and intruders can represent a country's parliament.

http://www.burmalibrary.org/docs08/mag_arakan01-09.pdf

This is an internal issue of Myanmar.

We were just too generous this time. Should have closed the border like last time so they would take a boat and reach the shores of Thailand,Malaysia,Indonesia,Australia and you would have seen the affect sitting in Australia telling it Myanmarese internal affairs.

Not having high regards towards the Rohingya is quite a understatement

Yeah kept a entire ethnic people out of education,health care for decades what sort of things you could expect from such people.

 

[UKBengali]

This is an internal issue of Myanmar.. All countries that either voted against or abstained have clearly indicated non interference in to a domestic problem of a sovereign nation.. Those who voted for have either religious dogma affiliated with that decision or those vying to gain a foothold in the region via influence.. In this case the US and the Western block to counteract China

Some even going against the narrative or the propaganda of religious affiliation is the ASEAN block.. I just returned from KL Malaysia, Talking to locals there as regards to Rohingya, It’s pretty evident why Indonesia, Malaysia and Brunei show such a lackluster attitude even though being Muslim majority nations, Not having high regards towards the Rohingya is quite a understatement.. Most of the words used to describe them were not too kind

As far as Bangladesh is concerned they’re obliged to safeguard thier kith and kin.. So you can’t fault the Bangladeshi position viz a viz their own people

Rwanda and Malawi part of Western block?

We know that you are just supporting your religious kin in Myannmar.

read this if u can.
US Rex Tillerson even said only individuals of MM military can be potentially sanctioned lol (after going there to meet, and avoiding BD all together even after you begged for him to come), not even the whole.

Noose is tightening on your Barmans.

Whole West is against you and the Muslim world.

India did not support you as it knows that it is not in it's interest. Even your Chinese daddy will soon abandon you like they did North Korea.

Good job to those countries. Love this part too:

"The non-binding measure " @Aung Zaya

Also info on those that abstained:

http://www.thecitizen.in/index.php/...bstains-From-Voting-on-UN-Rohingya-Resolution

Among the 26 countries which abstained along with India, were Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bhutan and Japan.

@Gibbs

So why did India not support it's "friend" Myanmar?

Big daddy USA told it to I suppose. Hindus of S Asia have always been slaves.

 

[Nilgiri]

This is an internal issue of Myanmar.. All countries that either voted against or abstained have clearly indicated non interference in to a domestic problem of a sovereign nation.. Those who voted for have either religious dogma affiliated with that decision or those vying to gain a foothold in the region via influence.. In this case the US and the Western block to counteract China

Some even going against the narrative or the propaganda of religious affiliation is the ASEAN block.. I just returned from KL Malaysia, Talking to locals there as regards to Rohingya, It’s pretty evident why Indonesia, Malaysia and Brunei show such a lackluster attitude even though being Muslim majority nations, Not having high regards towards the Rohingya is quite a understatement.. Most of the words used to describe them were not too kind

As far as Bangladesh is concerned they’re obliged to safeguard thier kith and kin.. So you can’t fault the Bangladeshi position viz a viz their own people

Yah BD has to give its best game, and Myanmar will as well. Every country of course needs to put its interests first.

But only one side is calling the other as "monkeys" etc without offering any well thought out logical discussion here though....says a lot about the situation being largely emotion driven on one side (and you and I know how the same applied to SL civil war too) than facts/logic driven.

As for the S.E.A approach in the muslim majority countries there, I concur....having lived there before myself, there is not much broad sympathy/support for Bangladeshis (and by extension the Rohingya) given the stereotypes (true or untrue) perpetuated...being growing economies/societies themselves, there is only so much "snacking" leaders of such countries can have of the MSM drama for virtue signalling diet that the western globalists have for breakfast, lunch and dinner....and all the meals on top of that @Desert Fox

@Aung Zaya do we know where Thai govt and Thai people position generally are on the issue?

So why did India not support it's "friend" Myanmar?

Abstaining is best returns for UNGA dramabaaz lot of the time. No need to overplay a hand when nothing is on the line in first place (non-binding measure + UNGA floor vote that means zero).

Anyone play a final hand real hard when the pot is like chump change? Nope. MM knows where the real efforts from India and China are.

Big daddy USA told it to I suppose. Hindus of S Asia have always been slaves.

Means so much coming from a BD person

 

[Aung Zaya]

we know where Thai govt and Thai people position generally are on the issue?

actually Thais are ok coz they have vast exp like that in southern Thailand and understand our situation.so no problem at all in BKK. just one things they concerned that more boat people coming to Thailand shore if this issue cant solve.

 

[TopCat]

This is an internal issue of Myanmar..

Why refugees are pouring in other countries border when it was internal to MM. Get lost.

actually Thais are ok coz they have vast exp like that in southern Thailand and understand our situation.so no problem at all in BKK. just one things they concerned that more boat people coming to Thailand shore if this issue cant solve.

They do understand how karen were treated, and bearing the burnt of refugees/drugs themselves along with hordes of Burmese illegal immigrants. You are lucky shinawatra is not in power.

 

[Gibbs]

Belonging to same religion and wearing same dresses doesn't make them Bangladeshis. They are living there for generations,they were recognized citizens before Army removed their citizenship in 1982,MPs had representation in the Parliament. Dont say foreigners and intruders can represent a country's parliament.

http://www.burmalibrary.org/docs08/mag_arakan01-09.pdf

@Aung Zaya .. Given the source which is a blatant propaganda site, Just want to clarify are those featured So called Rohingya or Kamar ?? By the onset they look Myanmarese Kamar Muslims not Bengali’s

We know that you are just supporting your religious kin in Myannmar.

Ignorance is bliss

 

[UKBengali]

actually Thais are ok coz they have vast exp like that in southern Thailand and understand our situation.so no problem at all in BKK. just one things they concerned that more boat people coming to Thailand shore if this issue cant solve.

Thai F-16s bombed your "soldiers" when you got too adventurous on the border.

 

[Aung Zaya]

Thai F-16s bombed your "soldiers" when you got too adventurous on the border.

lol check back the history. Thai F-16 never bombed Myanmar. lol