Pretty easy stuff. Its always about people.
Get rid off all the idiots that are currently involved in these programs. According to the Senate report, its filled with folks with anger management issues, and people under investigations for sexual misconducts. Hire some people who understands getting intelligence of value and beating people to pulp are two different issues.
That would be a good start.
This is why i said you have no knowledge of how intelligence work, and you obiviously have not read the article i wrote.
You cannot compare Army intelligence to LEO intelligence or interrogation technique, cos the latter are after the fact, police will not question people to prevent crime and they only do so to investigate crime that had already happened.
That is why they have a larger timeframe (virtually) infinite amount of time to sit and talk using deductive reasoning and reid technique to get information out of a suspect
in case you are wondering, we, military intelligence people also trained with REID and all civil LEO technique, however we do not do it after the fact and mainly we want to prevent thing that will happen
SOON. I highlighted the word soon because there is a flaw for the LEO technique, thats if the prep or detainee just sit there for 2 days, it will render him irrevelent as whatever supposed to go down would have gone down already, the "intel" would instantly turn into toilet paper after the sensitive timeframe.
If we are hire to talk to the detainee in war, you may as well have a bunch of old lady to work mil-int, well at least they can make tea lol
seriously read the article i wrote, dont get biased information because i can still sensed that you think what we did was only beat someone senseless and pull people finger nail out. We dont do that
I can argue with you only you are on the same level as mine, otherwise it wouldhave been useless to even talk to you as you are thinking what we did was wrong even tho you have no idea what we did
I think the guy is just ignorant of the law
Even if you buy an assassin for a murder for example, the instigator of the crime is still punishable by law. Also the "assassin contract" is rendered illegal and not binding on any person by law
"Legislation
In the United States, the United Kingdom, and many other countries, a contract to kill a person is void, meaning that it is not legally enforceable. Any contract to commit an indictable offense is not enforceable. Thus, if a hitman takes the money but then fails or refuses to perform, the customer cannot sue for specific performance or for damages for breach of contract. Conversely, if the hitman performs the killing as promised but the customer refuses to pay, the hitman cannot sue the customer for monetary damages.
Furthermore, both the actual killer and the person who paid the killer can be found guilty of murder. Indeed, the acts of merely negotiating and paying for a contract killing (that is never actually carried out) are themselves punishable as attempted murder, as they constitute the "substantial step" towards a crime which are essential for imposing liability for an attempted crime.
Contract killing - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia "
and i think you are just ignorant on how we work, and the principle of rendition, probably best get a dictionary, then probably we can talk.
PS you cannot "buy" an assassin, you
hires them
