jhungary
MILITARY PROFESSIONAL
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2012
- Messages
- 19,295
- Reaction score
- 387
- Country
- Location
So the definition doesnt define a mad man shooting as a terrorist crime but if they happen to be brown suddenly they have an agenda and a label to fit the agenda?
What about those looneys who have an agenda to white wash America? How is thart not an agenda? How is that not fitting the bill? but rather fits insanity? the white kid who shot at the Black church had an agenda to get rid of Black folks but was never called a terrorist even if terrorized a community!
USA is a land of the law. we have to abide to what the law say. You obivious did not do much research and blinded by racial hatred and cannot see straight.
Here are the LAW in the US, you can have your own, but if you are talking about the US, then you have to use the US Federal Code
18 U.S.C. § 2331 defines "international terrorism" and "domestic terrorism" for purposes of Chapter 113B of the Code, entitled "Terrorism”:
"International terrorism" means activities with the following three characteristics:
- Involve violent acts or acts dangerous to human life that violate federal or state law;
- Appear to be intended (i) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population; (ii) to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or (iii) to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping; and
- Occur primarily outside the territorial jurisdiction of the U.S., or transcend national boundaries in terms of the means by which they are accomplished, the persons they appear intended to intimidate or coerce, or the locale in which their perpetrators operate or seek asylum.*
- Involve acts dangerous to human life that violate federal or state law;
- Appear intended (i) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population; (ii) to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or (iii) to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination. or kidnapping; and
- Occur primarily within the territorial jurisdiction of the U.S.
- Is calculated to influence or affect the conduct of government by intimidation or coercion, or to retaliate against government conduct; and
- Is a violation of one of several listed statutes, including § 930(c) (relating to killing or attempted killing during an attack on a federal facility with a dangerous weapon); and § 1114 (relating to killing or attempted killing of officers and employees of the U.S.).
FBI — Terrorism Definition
Read the red part
There are a lot of Brown, Black, Red, Yellow Serial Killer and mass murderer that does not classified as Terrorist.
There are a lot of White being labelled Terrorist as well.
The law said if an attack were aimed to change or alter the US government Policy, only then can be classified as Terrorist attack. You can say what you want, but fact is fact, what you don't understand does not mean other people also don't. If you have to see this world as White vs Color, then be my guest, I am not gonna argue with you on that.
By the way, the dude that shot up the black church IS NOT a terrorist. Not everyone that killed a lot of people is a terrorist. That dude did not coerce the civilian population, did not attack a Federal Employee nor did not attack a Federal Building. His crime is very obviously racially motivated.
You know as much as what happened in the US as I know as much as what happened in Pakistan, Not every Jim Dick and Jane were reported, I don't know what you say "Local Mishap" unless it warrant to know in the US, we simply don't care. You cannot sell TV rating or Paper in US by covering "Local Mishap" in Pakistan or anywhere else in the world
There are.
Don't know which bomb in a mall you are talking about
Refer to 18 USC I quoted above and see it for yourselves
Again, you are biased on the issue. You have to be naïve to think White and Christian Church were not being vandalize.
All women: 17.6%
- White women: 17.7%
- Black women: 18.8%
- Asian Pacific Islander women: 6.8%
- American Indian/Alaskan women: 34.1%
- Mixed race women: 24.4%
Problem with you, again, you only see thing happened in your own circle, You never have been to the United States, but you see a country you have never been with your instinct and what other people tell you, which is extremely biased. Of course, you can have your biased view, I am merely pointing out the truth, believe it or not is up to you.
About Temple or mosque vandalize, as I said, it DOES NOT only happened to Muslim. You want to know why people do that? Beats me, why people steal stuff, assault others and kill other people? You said as if Muslim is the only religion being targeted, and I have shown you all other have been too, what more do you want?
So does no one tell those extremist to kill the infidel, why they do it? You are as ignorant as those hillbilly I mention, aren't you also never been to the US but start judging a country on its face value?
So you are saying people mistook LDS church as Islam Mosque? LOL
People don't like a particular religion, some people don't like Islam, as well as some people don't like Jewish, when there are freedom of religion, they will also harbor hatred of particular religion, not say hatred of Islam does not exist, just saying it exist alongside Hatred of Buddhist and Hatred of Christianity.
Well, it is not the 70s, we don't all chant (Indian or Chinese took my job BS) Unless I want to be a waiter or a cab driver, Chinese or Indian won't take my job.
As I said, I am not pretenting this does not happen and there were no bigot in America, but then it happened to different religion too,
I did not say that, I said, I cannot speak for others. You were asking how other people digest those information, hell if I know, I can only speak for myself, and they were covering those incident, but whether or not the reader digest the story is another issue
ok
But then same benefit of the doubt should be allowed for EVERY country, right?
What benefit of the doubt, you are the one accusing American being bigotry, it would be at your responsibility to prove proof, not mine, so for me, I am defending the value of America, I would enjoy the benefit of the doubt, not you.
As I said, your view is extremely biased, kind of like I was toward Muslim before I went to Iraq and Afghanistan. You saw some thing in a corner of thousand of information, and you pick it up and treat it like every other piece of information funnel thru the news or media is hostile to Muslim. I can tell you this out right, American don't really care about Muslim, they care about Kim Kardashian, Taylor Swift and whoever have sex with the top model this week, that is the information currently flooding our media.
Every American came from some place excelpt the locas i.e. American Indians....who were called that by the white guy who got lost and thought he landed in India
SO if a 3rd generation Brown can be told to go back where he/ she came from so can a 2nd or 4th generation white, right?
Oh btw, does this mean a 2nd generation Brown is not local enough to fit in domestic terrorism? Why the difference? Why call him / her by their descend and not say a child of British/ Spanish/ Norwegian descendant opened fire at school today?
Again, you are talking about the "Dumb Down" level of America, not all of us go around and tell color folks to go back to where you came from, by the way, I saw some white dude telling another white dude just last week during NYE celebration to go back to wherever he claw out of for speaking German in a Pub.
I don't know who you are referring to. EVERY terrorist attack happened within America is Domestic Terrorism. EVERY Terrorist attack happened outside America is International Terrorism as per 18 USC, the deciding factor is not on WHOEVER carry out those attack, he can be a White American who bomb a Baghdad US Army barrack and it would still be international terrorism, Or he could be a brown people and bomb a federal building and be called a Domestic terrorist attack.
Last edited:
