What's new

Reasons why USA will indirectly protect India from Pakistan.

As a guest on this forum you should expect some civility (something lacking in indian forums) but you dont always which is unfortunate

But im not sure why you indians think at a state level we should be friends

We are at war and need to accept the consequences of the Kashmir issue

Re read my post - we are not wanting war, stop the terror factories, stop the provocations. It's not rocket science, it will pave the way for dialogue.
 
.
USA did not protect its great ally Pakistan in '71 why will it protect India :D .

At the end of the India wherever India and Pakistan go to war no one will come in between . No one wants a rogue nuclear missile heading their way .
Correction: USA could not given:
1. Pakistan gave up within two weeks, hence too little time for any foreign assistance.
2. Soviets submarines complicated American intervention of any form.

Soviets knew very well USA or its allies will never risk a direct military confrontation for Pakistan.

https://in.rbth.com/articles/2011/12/20/1971_war_how_russia_sank_nixons_gunboat_diplomacy_14041

To counter this two-pronged British-American threat, Russia dispatched a nuclear-armed flotilla from Vladivostok on December 13 under the overall command of Admiral Vladimir Kruglyakov, the Commander of the 10th Operative Battle Group (Pacific Fleet). Though the Russian fleet comprised a good number of nuclear-armed ships and atomic submarines, their missiles were of limited range (less than 300 km). Hence to effectively counter the British and American fleets the Russian commanders had to undertake the risk of encircling them to bring them within their target. This they did with military precision.

In an interview to a Russian TV programme after his retirement, Admiral Kruglyakov, who commanded the Pacific Fleet from 1970 to 1975, recalled that Moscow ordered the Russian ships to prevent the Americans and British from getting closer to “Indian military objects”. The genial Kruglyakov added: “The Chief Commander’s order was that our submarines should surface when the Americans appear. It was done to demonstrate to them that we had nuclear submarines in the Indian Ocean. So when our subs surfaced, they recognised us. In the way of the American Navy stood the Soviet cruisers, destroyers and atomic submarines equipped with anti-ship missiles. We encircled them and trained our missiles at the Enterprise. We blocked them and did not allow them to close in on Karachi, Chittagong or Dhaka."

At this point, the Russians intercepted a communication from the commander of the British carrier battle group, Admiral Dimon Gordon, to the Seventh Fleet commander: “Sir, we are too late. There are the Russian atomic submarines here, and a big collection of battleships.” The British ships fled towards Madagascar while the larger US task force stopped before entering the Bay of Bengal.
 
. .
Not sure, maybe the Bengalis might be enough for you guys, they are a sovereign nation who know how to defend their own keep.

If Pakistan is this weak country, why asking 'indirect' help from US?

Re read my post - we are not wanting war, stop the terror factories, stop the provocations. It's not rocket science, it will pave the way for dialogue.

U.N wanted to visit Kashmir and India didn't let it visit. Why? You know the answer?
Indian armed forces itself are terrorists. The world is seeing their terrorism.
 
.
You occupied Kashmir thus you wanted war

Let's agree to disagree respectfully, but on a side note, it's humours to say the least!

If Pakistan is this weak country, why asking 'indirect' help from US?



U.N wanted to visit Kashmir and India didn't let it visit. Why? You know the answer?
Indian armed forces itself are terrorists. The world is seeing their terrorism.

No one is asking for the US help, last when we looked the Americans were arming you the to the teeth to fight India, yet you failed in every attempt we know how to win our own wars. Get the facts straight, Tikae
 
.
Did Mukto Banglos bombed Chittagong harbour ?



We don't exactly need 'help' to deal with you as proved in 1971


In fact you did. You needed the help of the bengalis to have a ratio of 75:1 against cut off Pakistani soldiers in order to defeat them. That too when they were 2500s of kms away from their homeland with 0 supplies and provisions. Also when the Pakistani soldiers could not be bothered to fight for a piece of land that contained a race that was alien to us.
 
.
In fact you did. You needed the help of the bengalis to have a ratio of 75:1 against cut off Pakistani soldiers in order to defeat them. That too when they were 2500s of kms away from their homeland with 0 supplies and provisions. Also when the Pakistani soldiers could not be bothered to fight for a piece of land that contained a race that was alien to us.
1971 and Bengal are the blackest and bleakest moments in our history. I wish to do everything to remove this pointless war from our history.
 
.
US is no one's friend. I don't understand why Indians don't learn this thing. US MNCs have already sucked the happiness out of Indian people.
I would advice Pakistan to end terrorism and promote the home grown industry, and work for the happiness of the People. GDP means nothing if people are not happy, which is the case with India right now where all are corporate slaves to US company.
Please go through this thread : https://defence.pk/threads/why-is-i...-mncs-why-cant-india-learn-from-china.464829/
 
.
We d9nt need a protector, we are not Pakistanis.
 
.
1971 and Bengal are the blackest and bleakest moments in our history. I wish to do everything to remove this pointless war from our history.


No it's not. We don't need an alien race being part of our nation. If the bangladeshis could be Pakistanis than so can the Zulus, Aborigines & Eskimos. It's the precise reason why they separated. It was a good thing.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom