Ram Nath Kovind takes oath as India's new president amidst slogans of Jai Shri Ram in parliament

[padamchen]

Hindu renaissance is just STARTING ......... if you think THIS is bad, wait for 10 more years as more and more Hindus become richer and more vocal and free.

What do you think will happen 20 years from now ?

I'll be settled with my brood somewhere in Europe.

Cheers, Doc

 

[HariVamsha]

I'll be settled with my brood somewhere in Europe.

Cheers, Doc

LOL.... in your dreams ...... how old are you again ?

I bet you are too old to emigrate even to canada.

 

[Pakistani E]

LoL in my community, we consider Hazrat Ram to have been one of the prophet's of God, or atleast a very saintly personage worthy of respect. I know I am a Pakistani so not really related to this thread, but if I was an Indian, I would have no issue with that slogan.

 

[salimpheku]

I'll be settled with my brood somewhere in Europe.

Cheers, Doc

Been here recently?
They are getting killed by truck driving seculars on a regular basis here. Worse, these killer secular families are awarded millions of dollars for some strange reasons!!

hmm...may be that's exactly why you want to come here. You will fit perfectly.

 

[Turingsage]

so MPs saying Jai shri ram is communal ! But MPs Attending a particular religion's festival is Secular. President House hosting party for a particular religion is Secular ! a MP badmouthing Hindu Gods inside parliament is secular !

Sorry I thanked your post instead of pressing reply. I will try to keep it simple.

When you stumph your wife in bedroom its fine. When you stumph her in front of your parents or children its not. If you were so inclined, and stumph your wife or others amongst consenting adults, a its a bit icky at best.

Same act different ethical results.

When Abdul Kalam was inaugurated as our President on the floor of our Apex institution and were the Muslim legislators to shout Allah-U-Akbar, you would be frothing at the mouth and having a apoplectic fit.

I would be incandescent and furious.

Wearing orange robes, lotuses, turbans, skull caps, beards, burkha's, saris, a kara, a kanga in parliament or at parties within the grounds of the Parliament is fine.

Hindus have ruled India for the last 70 years. Were not Lal Bahadur Shastri, Sarverpalli Radhakrisnan, Indira Gandhi ,Atal Bihai Vajpayee and many others not Hindus in your eyes ?

You have some deep seated emotional and psychological issues which you need to work through, but you have poured all that hurt into some fantastic world of perceived, special deliberate organised Hindu persecution.

We have a imperfect society where many are persecuted, and abused for religion, caste, social status, race, wealth or the lack of it, and gender but we are also a nation a laws, made in that Parliament for which you have such disdain. That Parliament is chosen by the people of India to put right some of what ails us. On that floor shouting banal religious slogans diminishes us.

@padamchen

 

[HariVamsha]

Sorry I thanked your post instead of pressing reply. I will try to keep it simple.

When you stumph your wife in bedroom its fine. When you stumph her in front of your parents or children its not. If you were so inclined, and stumph your wife or others amongst consenting adults, a its a bit icky at best.

Same act different ethical results.

When Abdul Kalam was inaugurated as our President on the floor of our Apex institution and were the Muslim legislators to shout Allah-U-Akbar, you would be frothing at the mouth and having a apoplectic fit.

I would be incandescent and furious.

Wearing orange robes, lotuses, turbans, skull caps, beards, burkha's, saris, a kara, a kanga in parliament or at parties within the grounds of the Parliament is fine.

Hindus have ruled India for the last 70 years. Were not Lal Bahadur Shastri, Sarverpalli Radhakrisnan, Indira Gandhi ,Atal Bihai Vajpayee and many others not Hindus in your eyes ?

You have some deep seated emotional and psychological issues which you need to work through, but you have poured all that hurt into some fantastic world of perceived, special deliberate organised Hindu persecution.

We have a imperfect society where many are persecuted, and abused for religion, caste, social status, race, wealth or the lack of it, and gender but we are also a nation a laws, made in that Parliament for which you have such disdain. That Parliament is chosen by the people of India to put right some of what ails us. On that floor shouting banal religious slogans diminishes us.

@padamchen

Muslims have already shouted allah ho akbar while they demanded a separate "pure land" for muslims to live. They called it pakistan and 98% of all muslims in India voted for it. This is not some "imagination", this is Reality and history.

That leaves India for the Hindus to shout "Jai shree Ram".

So maybe "jai shree ram" reminds us of history and the realities that most people want to gloss over and pretend it never happened.

It was Indra Gandhi who inserted the word "secular" into the constitution during emergency AFTER the Supreme Court told her it cannot be done.

I do not think reaffirming the lessons of history by shouting "jai shree Ram" diminishes us in any way. It only seeks to strengthen us and remind us who we really are.

Now can you live with this ?

 

[Turingsage]

Muslims have already shouted allah ho akbar while they demanded a separate "pure land" for muslims to live. They called it pakistan and 98% of all muslims in India voted for it. This is not some "imagination", this is Reality and history.

That leaves India for the Hindus to shout "Jai shree Ram".

So maybe "jai shree ram" reminds us of history and the realities that most people want to gloss over and pretend it never happened.

It was Indra Gandhi who inserted the word "secular" into the constitution during emergency AFTER the Supreme Court told her it cannot be done.

I do not think reaffirming the lessons of history by shouting "jai shree Ram" diminishes us in any way. It only seeks to strengthen us and remind us who we really are.

Now can you live with this ?

Go away, you are damaged and cannot comprehend the basis of the debate, or even a passing understanding of my countries history. Go out there screaming your head off about how you are more Hindu than us.

 

[salimpheku]

When you stumph your wife in bedroom its fine. When you stumph her in front of your parents or children its not. If you were so inclined, and stumph your wife or others amongst consenting adults, a its a bit icky at best.

Now you are equating praying to 'Hindu' gods to stumphing your wife?!!
I see seculars going bonkers at Hindus asking for break from the loud speakers on mosques. I see seculars attending, in fact competing to attend the muslim iftars. That's not bonking your wife, right?
Oh wait, until then you probably felt it's secular to bonk your wife in public.

Only when Hindus are chanting 'Jai Shree Ram' does this leave bad taste in secular mouth.

Even now, there is NOT ONE secular taking out a protest against Loud speakers on mosques. In fact these same people who have no problems with you bonking your wife in public, took on people who spoke against the loud speakers on mosques.

I am sorry to ask this but when muslims stop traffic and pray on roads or give iftar parties, does 'bonk the wife' logic then? Or is it something special only when hindu gods are praised in public?

Go away, you are damaged and cannot comprehend the basis of the debate, or even a passing understanding of my countries history. Go out there screaming your head off about how you are more Hindu than us.

You just equated praying to god to bonk the wife, I really doubt you can even comprehend the meaning of logic to start a debate.

 

[HariVamsha]

Go away, you are damaged and cannot comprehend the basis of the debate, or even a passing understanding of my countries history. Go out there screaming your head off about how you are more Hindu than us.

LOL....... looks like you cannot handle the truth

 

[Turingsage]

LOL....... looks like you cannot handle the truth

Whatever quietens a damaged child. Thank you and goodbye

 

[HariVamsha]

Whatever quietens a damaged child

LOL.... any more examples about boinking your wife to demonstrate "logic" ?

 

[padamchen]

Sorry I thanked your post instead of pressing reply. I will try to keep it simple.

When you stumph your wife in bedroom its fine. When you stumph her in front of your parents or children its not. If you were so inclined, and stumph your wife or others amongst consenting adults, a its a bit icky at best.

Same act different ethical results.

When Abdul Kalam was inaugurated as our President on the floor of our Apex institution and were the Muslim legislators to shout Allah-U-Akbar, you would be frothing at the mouth and having a apoplectic fit.

I would be incandescent and furious.

Wearing orange robes, lotuses, turbans, skull caps, beards, burkha's, saris, a kara, a kanga in parliament or at parties within the grounds of the Parliament is fine.

Hindus have ruled India for the last 70 years. Were not Lal Bahadur Shastri, Sarverpalli Radhakrisnan, Indira Gandhi ,Atal Bihai Vajpayee and many others not Hindus in your eyes ?

You have some deep seated emotional and psychological issues which you need to work through, but you have poured all that hurt into some fantastic world of perceived, special deliberate organised Hindu persecution.

We have a imperfect society where many are persecuted, and abused for religion, caste, social status, race, wealth or the lack of it, and gender but we are also a nation a laws, made in that Parliament for which you have such disdain. That Parliament is chosen by the people of India to put right some of what ails us. On that floor shouting banal religious slogans diminishes us.

@padamchen

Articulate.

These are the Hindu Taliban.

And as for Taliban elsewhere, there are the right kind of Hindus, the wrong kind of Hindus, and then there are the rest.

No prizes for guessing what is to be done to the last two.

Cheers, Doc

Now you are equating praying to 'Hindu' gods to stumphing your wife?!!
I see seculars going bonkers at Hindus asking for break from the loud speakers on mosques. I see seculars attending, in fact competing to attend the muslim iftars. That's not bonking your wife, right?
Oh wait, until then you probably felt it's secular to bonk your wife in public.

Only when Hindus are chanting 'Jai Shree Ram' does this leave bad taste in secular mouth.

Even now, there is NOT ONE secular taking out a protest against Loud speakers on mosques. In fact these same people who have no problems with you bonking your wife in public, took on people who spoke against the loud speakers on mosques.

I am sorry to ask this but when muslims stop traffic and pray on roads or give iftar parties, does 'bonk the wife' logic then? Or is it something special only when hindu gods are praised in public?



You just equated praying to god to bonk the wife, I really doubt you can even comprehend the meaning of logic to start a debate.

Just a note to you on iftar patties.

As a non Hindu non Muslim carnivore.

Let me tell you something.

When it comes to meat, you do not exist on the same planet as Muslims do.

So yes, Ifttar parties are the bomb.

Cheers, Doc

 

[salimpheku]

Just a note to you on iftar patties.

As a non Hindu non Muslim carnivore.

Let me tell you something.

When it comes to meat, you do not exist on the same planet as Muslims do.

So yes, Ifttar parties are the bomb.

Cheers, Doc

The usual diversionary tactic when the bonking is exposed.
I don't care what you eat, where you eat it and how you eat it. You are barking up the wrong tree here in this aspect.
My problem is the open acceptance & appeasement when Muslims wear their religion on their sleeves & at the same time having problems with Hindus doing it.

FFS, have some uniformity in your secularism!

 

[padamchen]

The usual diversionary tactic when the bonking is exposed.
I don't care what you eat, where you eat it and how you eat it. You are barking up the wrong tree here in this aspect.
My problem is the open acceptance & appeasement when Muslims wear their religion on their sleeves & at the same time having problems with Hindus doing it.

FFS, have some uniformity in your secularism!

I needed to mention it since you were becoming positively anal about the iftar parties.

Do we not also play Holi and celebrate Christmas?

Why the butt pain about iftar parties then?

None of us give a fig what you think to be honest.

Your version of Hindu identity for our nation is rejected.

India is and will forever remain secular.

Cheers, Doc

 

[salimpheku]

I needed to mention it since you were becoming positively anal about the iftar parties.

Do we not also play Holi and celebrate Christmas?

Why the butt pain about iftar parties then?

None of us give a fig what you think to be honest.

Your version of Hindu identity for our nation is rejected.

India is and will forever remain secular.

India is and will forever remain secular because we Hindus will ensure "seculars" will be defeated in their "agenda".

The secular butthurt is pretty much acknowledged now a days all over India.

Like I already mentioned, I don't care how muslims celebrate & who they celebrate it with. I only care when the likes of YOU are having problems with Hindus celebrating.

Look at THIS thread. It's your kind who started saying 'Jai shree Ram' should NOT be uttered. Only after that this whole naked exposing of your kind started.

You have objections to Hindus celebrating - hence the parity of argument in us bringing in how you lot are silent when muslims do it.

I do agree with you though. India for ever will remain secular. We will bring in UCC & we will make sure there is no special treatment of one particular religion.