If any Hindu idols are found there, sure, why not?But the idols at Kaaba were Mesopotamian deities, not Indian. Allat, Manat, Al-uzza etc don't sound all that Indian to me.
If undoing acts of earlier barbarism isn't the issue, then what is? The gyanvapi mosque is also in the news frequently as an example similar to Babri Masjid. Will that be left alone, if all this isn't about righting the past wrongs?
............ you are free to spin and demolish similar Strawmen. 
I have ALREADY mentioned what the issue is. Why do you play the fool and keep asking questions which has already been answered ?
1. Hindus have legal possession of land
2. Archaeological evidence show existence of Temple
3. Historical evidence show existence of Ram Janmabhoomi temple.
4. Sight of mosque in that place is an continued insult to the Hindu consciousness of that land.
5. Insistence of the muslims for refusing the acknowledge the historical barbarity is a insult to the Hindu consciousness.
6. Insistence of the muslims not to allow Temple in exchange of new mosque is again a Insult to the Hindu consciousness.
7. Continued insistence of muslims to not allow for negotiation is again example of antagonism and insult to Hindu consciousness.
8. Historical evidence show popularity of the site and worship by large number of Hindus.
9. Insistence of muslims to continue calling the structure "masjid" even when every indicator past and present show that a structure not in use as a masjid does not retain its religious significance.
10. Refusal of govt. to facilitate the building of the temple is another wound of the body of Hindu collective consciousness. Its not the British govt. any more, nor is it the mogul govt.
Each and every one of the individual points stands on its own merit. .............. and yet you continue to ask, what is wrong.
None so blind as those who refuse to see.
Where those mosques and churches build by demolishing the Hindu temples and built on their ruins ?
First educate yourself on Indian Law before arguing on it.
Once prana prathhista pooja is done the temple legally belong to the presiding deity. Before that the property belong to the manager or custodian or individual who owns it. No legal transfer via registration is required.
This is especially true for ancient temples. The others are just trustees of that temple.
..........another logical fallacy.
Maybe that will be enough / Maybe it will be a good start, but at least an argument can be made that and effort was made. That changes everything.
The partition of India was done by MUTUAL AGREEMENT and UNDERSTANDING .
Was the demolition of the temple done the same way ?
So which all wrongs should we go about righting at the end of the day?
LOL....if it is proved that the temple was destroyed and a mosque was built there then the land ownership automatically transfers to the Hindus.
Especially since the land was given to the muslims by the same muslim king who destroyed the temple and build the mosque
EVEN when the mosque was built, historical evidence show it remained a Hindu place of worship and hindu pilgrims continued to treat it like a temple .
Lastly BY LAW if the possession of the place is by Hindus for at least 14 years, the law states that the land now LEGALLY belong to the Hindus .............. its called The Doctrine of Adverse Possession.
This is because under India law a temple legally belongs to the presiding deity, and in this case is Lord Ram lala for the last 70 odd years.
Even other wise since it's been proven that a temple existed there, the ownership of the temple reverts back to the presiding god and since god is ageless, the land belongs to him for all of perpetuity.
Finally I already know you are a muslim, why don't you come out in the open and declare it ?
Wrong again .......I have quoted multiple proof that demonstrates evidence that first babur and then Auranzeb had destroyed the temple and associated structures.
No proof of it being ram birthplace is required as its a matter of faith. The court cannot decide on that matter. It can only decide on land ownership
No rebuilding the Temple sends a VERY WRONG precedent to the whole nation and to the whole world. If it could not be ignored for the last 400 years what makes you think it can be ignored now
Being wilfully blind to a 400 year old injury and sore on the body of Hindu consciousness just to appease muslims is the height of religious pandering and minority appeasement.
And how do you suggest 2 million ia would be defeated?
Neither was the destruction of the Babri Masjid done by mutual consent. Looks like we're square and even.
Of course, partition was a mutual exercise, but there were always many who refused to accept it lying down. Nathuram Godse's ashes still haven't been immersed in any water body and await the forceful reintegration of the Sindhu back to India.
.......maybe next time you can drag in Hitler and Nazi too.
I have ALREADY answered that and as usual you pretend ignorance and ask it again. Go back to my previous posts and read it AGAIN.
Another Red Herring by dragging "nathuram godse"....what has that got to do with anything ?
We are supposed to make attempts in righting ALL wrong ......that is what DHARMA means.
You can start by supporting building the Ram Temple on the original site and a mosque on a separate site.
LOL....very true. But "hinduguy" is actually a muslim, irrelevant that he is. I have seen enough of his posts to realize that.
I have ALREADY answered that and as usual you pretend ignorance and ask it again. Go back to my previous posts and read it AGAIN.
Another Red Herring by dragging "nathuram godse"....what has that got to do with anything ?
We are supposed to make attempts in righting ALL wrong ......that is what DHARMA means.
You can start by supporting building the Ram Temple on the original site and a mosque on a separate site.
LOL....very true. But "hinduguy" is actually a muslim, irrelevant that he is. I have seen enough of his posts to realize that.
............... are you trying to write your own Hindu religious scriptures ? 
.............. maybe you are planing to write a new Bhagwat Gita teaching us the new improved "dharma" which is different from what Sri. Krishna taught us. 
Still as long as they support Modi for whatever reasons, I don't care. Leave them the safety of their cocoon.
LOL...this is a ridiculous assertion. Dharma is not base on individual perception and convenience.
We are following the precedent set by Sri. Ramchandra when he killing Bali by hiding behind a tree and explained how it was not in violation of dharma.
Go back and understand Hinduism before making a fool of yourself by claiming my dharma is your adharma
........... only thing that has not changed is Dharma. That has remained almost constant all this time.
