BATMAN
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 31, 2007
- Messages
- 29,895
- Reaction score
- -28
- Country
- Location
Its not a dichotomy.
There are far more shades of grey here. And, putting motives and geopolitics aside, I question the authority, capability and political will this coalition brings to the table.
In Pakistan, we have an established intelligence network, unquestionable resolve, political will and even then Zarb-e-Azb extracted a pound of flesh. As of yet, Pakistan, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, UAE, Nigeria, Bangladesh, Libya, Nigeria and Oman have suggested they will be involved in a military role in IMAFT. How many of these nations are truly on-board? How many body bags before their resolve and political will starts to waivers?
This isn't a walk in a park. It will extract a pound of flesh just like Zarb-e-Azb.
It matters not, who is on board and how far.
What matters is... we take the lead early and get the job done.
I being Muslim.. have to listen anti Islam remarks and propaganda. Indians around keep propagating that its Pakistan who is epi center of regional terrorism.
If it needs pound of flesh, than it should have been paid much before loosing limbs and arms.
I'm affraid, Pakistan is not doing enough and clearly we failed to see the gravity of situation.
Isis is conspiracy against us and it should be exposed and decimated by us not by US or USSR.