Rabbani voices possibility of Senate inquiry against President Alvi

[FOOLS_NIGHTMARE]

• Controversy erupts after President Alvi made startling revelation.
• Senate can probe Alvi's claim that staff "undermined" his command.
• Rabbani says Alvi's tweet was inappropriate.

ISLAMABAD: Senator Raza Rabbani on Monday expressed the possibility of an inquiry led by the Senate into President Arif Alvi's statement that officials at the presidency "undermined" his command.

The former Senate chairman pointed out that if an inquiry is initiated, the president will have to appear before a committee of the upper house since he is a part of the parliament under Article 50 of the Constitution.

The controversy erupted after President Alvi made a startling revelation on Sunday, saying he had refused to sign into law two bills that would give authorities more power to prosecute people for acts against the state and military, a move the law ministry said was unconstitutional.

"As God is my witness, I did not sign Official Secrets Amendment Bill 2023 & Pakistan Army Amendment Bill 2023 as I disagreed with these laws," the president said on his personal social media account — a move that triggered a debate on the interpretation of Article 75.

He said he had asked his staff to return the bills unsigned to the legislature within the stipulated time to make them ineffective.

"However I have found out today that my staff undermined my will and command," the president added.

Speaking on the matter at the Sindh High Court today, Rabbani — himself a legal expert — said that Alvi's tweet was inappropriate.

“The president is the head of the state, he could have returned the bills constitutionally under Article 75, the way he sent other bills.”

“Neither did he want to sign the bills nor did he want to give his observation on them. What’s this?”

The veteran politician said that the president is part of the parliament under Article 50 of the Constitution and should appear before a Senate committee.

The officers involved in this should appear there, he said, adding this committee should investigate and dig out the real facts.

“If it is proved that the president has made a false statement, then action can be initiated against him according to the law.”

When asked about the status of these bills, Rabbani responded, “It is not yet clear whether the president has signed them or not. On the one hand, he is saying that he did not sign and at the same time he is also apologising to those who would be affected.”

Article 75 of the Constitution is very clear in this matter, he said.

“Anything can happen during the current circumstances, said the PPP leader when asked what if the president says that he did not post the statement on X, formerly Twitter.

Rabbani added that Alvi’s term is ending on September 9 and an inquiry can be launched against him by the Senate.

“If the Senate body comes to a conclusion that President Alvi made a false statement then action should be taken against him.”

However, the issue of the president's impeachment is different, but the Senate can conduct an inquiry, he said.

Rabbani voices possibility of Senate inquiry against President Alvi

Controversy erupts after President Alvi made startling revelation.Senate can probe Alvi's claim that staff undermined his command.Rabbani says Alvi's tweet was inappropriate.ISLAMABAD: Senator...

www.geo.tv

 

[Trango Towers]

Alvi going to jail soon for lying

There is no rule of law...

Guns guns and gun..

 

[Asimzranger]

hina rabbani and desi liberals are the biggest munafiq

 

[HAIDER]

View attachment 947579

• Controversy erupts after President Alvi made startling revelation.
• Senate can probe Alvi's claim that staff "undermined" his command.
• Rabbani says Alvi's tweet was inappropriate.

ISLAMABAD: Senator Raza Rabbani on Monday expressed the possibility of an inquiry led by the Senate into President Arif Alvi's statement that officials at the presidency "undermined" his command.

The former Senate chairman pointed out that if an inquiry is initiated, the president will have to appear before a committee of the upper house since he is a part of the parliament under Article 50 of the Constitution.

The controversy erupted after President Alvi made a startling revelation on Sunday, saying he had refused to sign into law two bills that would give authorities more power to prosecute people for acts against the state and military, a move the law ministry said was unconstitutional.

"As God is my witness, I did not sign Official Secrets Amendment Bill 2023 & Pakistan Army Amendment Bill 2023 as I disagreed with these laws," the president said on his personal social media account — a move that triggered a debate on the interpretation of Article 75.

He said he had asked his staff to return the bills unsigned to the legislature within the stipulated time to make them ineffective.

"However I have found out today that my staff undermined my will and command," the president added.

Speaking on the matter at the Sindh High Court today, Rabbani — himself a legal expert — said that Alvi's tweet was inappropriate.

“The president is the head of the state, he could have returned the bills constitutionally under Article 75, the way he sent other bills.”

“Neither did he want to sign the bills nor did he want to give his observation on them. What’s this?”

The veteran politician said that the president is part of the parliament under Article 50 of the Constitution and should appear before a Senate committee.

The officers involved in this should appear there, he said, adding this committee should investigate and dig out the real facts.

“If it is proved that the president has made a false statement, then action can be initiated against him according to the law.”

When asked about the status of these bills, Rabbani responded, “It is not yet clear whether the president has signed them or not. On the one hand, he is saying that he did not sign and at the same time he is also apologising to those who would be affected.”

Article 75 of the Constitution is very clear in this matter, he said.

“Anything can happen during the current circumstances, said the PPP leader when asked what if the president says that he did not post the statement on X, formerly Twitter.

Rabbani added that Alvi’s term is ending on September 9 and an inquiry can be launched against him by the Senate.

“If the Senate body comes to a conclusion that President Alvi made a false statement then action should be taken against him.”

However, the issue of the president's impeachment is different, but the Senate can conduct an inquiry, he said.

Rabbani voices possibility of Senate inquiry against President Alvi

Controversy erupts after President Alvi made startling revelation.Senate can probe Alvi's claim that staff undermined his command.Rabbani says Alvi's tweet was inappropriate.ISLAMABAD: Senator...

www.geo.tv

First, these Son of Biatches tell the nation why they vote anti citizen law in parliament. Including these SOB of PMLN. Forget about President's statement... these bagharat sold their mother to protect their harm ki wealth ...

 

[SaadH]

hina rabbani and desi liberals are the biggest munafiq

Abay yeh chutiya pony tail wala landay ka liberal socialist jiyala statesman Raza Rabbani hai.

 

[ziaulislam]

View attachment 947579

• Controversy erupts after President Alvi made startling revelation.
• Senate can probe Alvi's claim that staff "undermined" his command.
• Rabbani says Alvi's tweet was inappropriate.

ISLAMABAD: Senator Raza Rabbani on Monday expressed the possibility of an inquiry led by the Senate into President Arif Alvi's statement that officials at the presidency "undermined" his command.

The former Senate chairman pointed out that if an inquiry is initiated, the president will have to appear before a committee of the upper house since he is a part of the parliament under Article 50 of the Constitution.

The controversy erupted after President Alvi made a startling revelation on Sunday, saying he had refused to sign into law two bills that would give authorities more power to prosecute people for acts against the state and military, a move the law ministry said was unconstitutional.

"As God is my witness, I did not sign Official Secrets Amendment Bill 2023 & Pakistan Army Amendment Bill 2023 as I disagreed with these laws," the president said on his personal social media account — a move that triggered a debate on the interpretation of Article 75.

He said he had asked his staff to return the bills unsigned to the legislature within the stipulated time to make them ineffective.

"However I have found out today that my staff undermined my will and command," the president added.

Speaking on the matter at the Sindh High Court today, Rabbani — himself a legal expert — said that Alvi's tweet was inappropriate.

“The president is the head of the state, he could have returned the bills constitutionally under Article 75, the way he sent other bills.”

“Neither did he want to sign the bills nor did he want to give his observation on them. What’s this?”

The veteran politician said that the president is part of the parliament under Article 50 of the Constitution and should appear before a Senate committee.

The officers involved in this should appear there, he said, adding this committee should investigate and dig out the real facts.

“If it is proved that the president has made a false statement, then action can be initiated against him according to the law.”

When asked about the status of these bills, Rabbani responded, “It is not yet clear whether the president has signed them or not. On the one hand, he is saying that he did not sign and at the same time he is also apologising to those who would be affected.”

Article 75 of the Constitution is very clear in this matter, he said.

“Anything can happen during the current circumstances, said the PPP leader when asked what if the president says that he did not post the statement on X, formerly Twitter.

Rabbani added that Alvi’s term is ending on September 9 and an inquiry can be launched against him by the Senate.

“If the Senate body comes to a conclusion that President Alvi made a false statement then action should be taken against him.”

However, the issue of the president's impeachment is different, but the Senate can conduct an inquiry, he said.

Rabbani voices possibility of Senate inquiry against President Alvi

Controversy erupts after President Alvi made startling revelation.Senate can probe Alvi's claim that staff undermined his command.Rabbani says Alvi's tweet was inappropriate.ISLAMABAD: Senator...

www.geo.tv

Glade he choose asim munir otherwise there would have been some confusion

Abay yeh chutiya pony tail wala landay ka liberal socialist jiyala statesman Raza Rabbani hai.

hina rabbani and desi liberals are the biggest munafiq

"Were" not "are"

Munafiq is when they have double standards

They don't have double standards anymore..it's one standard "asim munir standard"

 

[ziaulislam]

 

[Jango]

PPP really has mastered the art of playing to both sides of the aisle.

 

[ziaulislam]

PPP really has mastered the art of playing to both sides of the aisle.

Honestly that's what it thought in 2008 but when you get involved in delusional behavior you really don't know about it yourself

PPPP has long crossed the road and is no longer seen as anti establishment party or party for democracy

 

[Jango]

Honestly that's what it thought in 2008 but when you get involved in delusional behavior you really don't know about it yourself

PPPP has long crossed the road and is no longer seen as anti establishment party or party for democracy

Oh haven't you seen their latest flip flop?

Now they are against elections going past 90 days, and they are also against the two bills that Alvi returned, even though in both cases they are the ones who agreed to both the things.

Also, they are now raising complaints about the CCI meeting in which 2 caretakers were present. To haramzado us meeting main yeh aiteraz uthana tha na.

 

[IceCold]

Is chutia ko koi betai ga Sadar ka khilaf inquiry nahi ho sakti. He has immunity. Shahbaz boot polisha Chala gaya ha apna abai Ghar London to yeh sala na zimadadi sambal li ha Asim ka boots polish kerna ki.

 

[ziaulislam]

View attachment 947579

• Controversy erupts after President Alvi made startling revelation.
• Senate can probe Alvi's claim that staff "undermined" his command.
• Rabbani says Alvi's tweet was inappropriate.

ISLAMABAD: Senator Raza Rabbani on Monday expressed the possibility of an inquiry led by the Senate into President Arif Alvi's statement that officials at the presidency "undermined" his command.

The former Senate chairman pointed out that if an inquiry is initiated, the president will have to appear before a committee of the upper house since he is a part of the parliament under Article 50 of the Constitution.

The controversy erupted after President Alvi made a startling revelation on Sunday, saying he had refused to sign into law two bills that would give authorities more power to prosecute people for acts against the state and military, a move the law ministry said was unconstitutional.

"As God is my witness, I did not sign Official Secrets Amendment Bill 2023 & Pakistan Army Amendment Bill 2023 as I disagreed with these laws," the president said on his personal social media account — a move that triggered a debate on the interpretation of Article 75.

He said he had asked his staff to return the bills unsigned to the legislature within the stipulated time to make them ineffective.

"However I have found out today that my staff undermined my will and command," the president added.

Speaking on the matter at the Sindh High Court today, Rabbani — himself a legal expert — said that Alvi's tweet was inappropriate.

“The president is the head of the state, he could have returned the bills constitutionally under Article 75, the way he sent other bills.”

“Neither did he want to sign the bills nor did he want to give his observation on them. What’s this?”

The veteran politician said that the president is part of the parliament under Article 50 of the Constitution and should appear before a Senate committee.

The officers involved in this should appear there, he said, adding this committee should investigate and dig out the real facts.

“If it is proved that the president has made a false statement, then action can be initiated against him according to the law.”

When asked about the status of these bills, Rabbani responded, “It is not yet clear whether the president has signed them or not. On the one hand, he is saying that he did not sign and at the same time he is also apologising to those who would be affected.”

Article 75 of the Constitution is very clear in this matter, he said.

“Anything can happen during the current circumstances, said the PPP leader when asked what if the president says that he did not post the statement on X, formerly Twitter.

Rabbani added that Alvi’s term is ending on September 9 and an inquiry can be launched against him by the Senate.

“If the Senate body comes to a conclusion that President Alvi made a false statement then action should be taken against him.”

However, the issue of the president's impeachment is different, but the Senate can conduct an inquiry, he said.

Rabbani voices possibility of Senate inquiry against President Alvi

Controversy erupts after President Alvi made startling revelation.Senate can probe Alvi's claim that staff undermined his command.Rabbani says Alvi's tweet was inappropriate.ISLAMABAD: Senator...

www.geo.tv

Fall from grace
How a pureist became like this

Tells u no man is immune to drugs & alcohol

Oh haven't you seen their latest flip flop?

Now they are against elections going past 90 days, and they are also against the two bills that Alvi returned, even though in both cases they are the ones who agreed to both the things.

Also, they are now raising complaints about the CCI meeting in which 2 caretakers were present. To haramzado us meeting main yeh aiteraz uthana tha na.

It's just second tire leadership

Main theme is do whatever u want.

PPPP has pretty freedom within the party so nothing surprisingly there

Also the complain is why isn't bilawal being given the opportunity next.

They want bilawal now and maryum in 2028 where is establishment want maryum now and bilawal in 2028

 

[Jango]

They want bilawal now and maryum in 2028 where is establishment want maryum now and bilawal in 2028

Estab wants Shahbaz, Nawaz wants Maryam.

Sara phadda hi aaj kal yeh dala hua hai.

Bajwa wanted Bilawal.

Pretty interesting stuff happening behind the scenes once you get to know about some of it.

Dono bhaion kay apnay darmyan thora mistrust hai, that is why you often see Shahbaz going overboard in Nawaz's tareefain in speeches.

 

[ziaulislam]

Estab wants Shahbaz, Nawaz wants Maryam.

Sara phadda hi aaj kal yeh dala hua hai.

Bajwa wanted Bilawal.

Pretty interesting stuff happening behind the scenes once you get to know about some of it.

Dono bhaion kay apnay darmyan thora mistrust hai, that is why you often see Shahbaz going overboard in Nawaz's tareefain in speeches.

Fault primarily lies in the people.
The people only want to vote for their bradery and not on merit

The pushtoons will vote only for pushtoons(okay technically people will disagree with me since we got a PMLN govt in 1997 in Kp), the Sindhis won't vote for outsider and punjabis will only vote for sharifs

Hence there is no need for any of these leaders to stick to principles

They just stick to hands out because that's how the society works

Hence Pakistanis deserve the current misery

 

[Jango]

Fault primarily lies in the people.
The people only want to vote for their bradery and not on merit

The pushtoons will vote only for pushtoons(okay technically people will disagree with me since we got a PMLN govt in 1997 in Kp), the Sindhis won't vote for outsider and punjabis will only vote for sharifs

Hence there is no need for any of these leaders to stick to principles

They just stick to hands out because that's how the society works

Hence Pakistanis deserve the current misery

I disagree with some of your comment, but agree with the general sentiment.

Jaisay log, waisay hukumran