Quran and 2012 .... Very Interesting !!!

[aliadams]

I haven't i am in a bit for hurry. So please just tell sumarise what you think will happen on 2012. And do you have any evidence to back up your claim.

a breif sumarry will do.

Please read my blog at http://aliadams.blog.com
You will find the best summary of all the evidence I hope.
Ali

 

[BordoEnes]

Even i am muslim and i find this stupid!

 

[A for Anarchy]

Salam brother, there is no relationship from surat Al-Rahaman back to surat Al-Fatiha. It is the other way round.

First I found that surat Al-Fatiha was built on prime numbers [7 verses, 29 words, 139 letters], with prime digit sums [7, 11, 13], and even the sum of theses sum [31] is prime too.

Then I found that 7.29.139 and 139.29.7 are primes too (remove the "." I just put them there to see where they come from]

Then remembered that surat Al-Rahmaan has a much repeated verse so I wanted to find if it was repeated prime number and it was [31].

Then I wanted to see if the 31 positions (verse numbers) are prime but they weren't [9 are and 22 not], so I thought of drawing them on a graph to see if they spell the word Allah for example but nothing came out.

The I graphed the gaps between them and once again nothing came out.

So I added them us because you cannot subtract them or you will end into negative, you cannot multiply as you will get composite (non-prime) and you cannot divide them as you will go below 1 and into non-integer numbers). So the addition gave me 1433 which is a prime number with a prime digit sum too (1+4+3+3=11) just like surat Al-Fatiha showed us and I was happy at that for few days.

After few days I realized that the current (then in 2008) hijri year was 1429AH and that is only 4 years away from 1433AH and the whole world is talking about 2012 so I became very happy to have found evidence from the Quran for 2012 but nobody cared and some told me I was doing kufir etc.

So I left the UAE to China and after a month I came back for VISA and was sitting next to some Muslim man from Mali and when I asked him to count the repeated verses in the Merciful chapter, he instead started counting the words of the chapter so I corrected him and we got the 31 verses, we add them up together and found 1433 showed him the hijri date was 1429AH and suggested 1433 could be a reference to 1433AH and end of story.

Then as I leant from life that nothing ever happens by coincident (not even a fly path) so I decided to count the words myself as God has just shown me the man doing so for a purpose. So as I was nearing the end I thought I was homing on 365 words but instead I got 355 words.

So I recounted and again 355 words.

Then almost within seconds I realized this is hijri year (lunar) and it has 11 days less than a solar year, but then again that should be 354 words not 355.

So I recounted and once again 355 words.

So I looked at the Hijri calendar for the year 1433AH and GOD BEHOLD it had 355 days. It is a leap year.

No one can imagine my happiness then up in the middle of the heaven receiving the missing link that 1433 is a reference to 1433AH

Everything fell into place then. Every word in the chapter points to a day in the Hijri year 1433AH and that immediately gave me 31 events each lasting 4 days because the verse has 4 words and even the dates for the events became known from mapping the word numbers to the day numbers in the year.

After few months in China people started demanding that I should find the locations of these events and after some thought I realized it is much easier than what I though. I was developing my QuranCode software and writing my Quran and 2012 book then.

The fact that each even lasts 4 days is the BIG CLUE. I started to try to find what type of events that would start and stop 31 times and every time lasts exactly 4 days.

Then I realized that if the events are coming from outer space then whatever hitting the Earth on one point for 4 days will sweep the Earth along a circle as it spins around 4 times in 4 days. That meant the locations are latitudes not cities.

Then when I found that the verse numbers themselves 13, ..., 77 fit with the range of latitude from 0 to 90 I was happy to think that these numbers are the latitudes but once while I was explaining this to someone in China I realized that these numbers not only fit within the range of latitudes but fit exactly in the middle. From 0 to 13 is 13, and from 77 to 90 is also 13. That made my day

Next we wanted to know if these latitudes are north or south but that didn’t take long since God in the verse address two entities (you both Man and Jinn) so that tells us that both hemispheres will be hit and most likely in alternating way (13N or 13S then 16S or 16N and so on).

Later I found two known errors in the Hijri calendar:
1) It didn’t start on the day of Hijra but instead on the 1/1 of the year of the Hiijra. That sets the event forward by 67 days.
2) The pre-Hijri calendar was adding a third months every 3 years to keep it in sync with the solar calendar (exactly like they do now in China) and Allah swt revealed Quran 9:36-37 to forbid this practice and after 10 years from the Hijra. That sets the events backwards by 89 days.

Hence the error margin -89/+67 days, and Allah knows best.

Then people start asking me what if nothing happens, then Allah thankfully guided me to two replies from the Quran:

Quran 13:39
أعوذ بالله من الشيطن الرجيم
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم
يَمْحُوا۟ ٱللَّهُ مَا يَشَآءُ وَيُثْبِتُ ۖ وَعِندَهُۥٓ أُمُّ ٱلْكِتَٰبِ
Allah makes to pass away and establishes what He pleases, and with Him is the basis of the Book.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
and
Quran 72:25
أعوذ بالله من الشيطن الرجيم
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم
قُلْ إِنْ أَدْرِىٓ أَقَرِيبٌۭ مَّا تُوعَدُونَ أَمْ يَجْعَلُ لَهُۥ رَبِّىٓ أَمَدًا
Say: I do not know whether that with which you are threatened be nigh or whether my Lord will appoint for it a term:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

LATER I found that the only primes from my study of surat Al-Fatiha that we not additive primes were 13 and 31.
And as the verse is repeated 31 times and the first repetition is verse 13 in chapter The Merciful, I understood that:

Whenever we get a prime number in the Quran that is not additive prime (its digit sum is not prime) then it is pointing to another place in the Quran with the same non-additive prime number. And whenever we get an additive prime number then we must think of something outside the text of the Quran (years, seconds, number of people, temperature, or EVER healing frequency !!!).

I also was guide to develop a new numerology system that assigns prime values to the Arabic alphabets and that produced amazing results too but it has nothing to do with the 2012 findings.

Please ask me ...

Salam

Ali Adams
God > infinity

Number of words in this = 1286

1286 was the year King Rudolph I of Germany declares all Jews to be "serfs of the Treasury", thus negating all their political freedoms.

Coincidence? I think not.

 

[aliadams]

You have not claimed anything worthwhile except for random excerpts from the Quran.

String theory explains matter in a much concise manner rather than your theory - most of which is copy pasted from Gaasenbeek's papers. Please explain to me how your theory explains the presence of Bose Einstein Condensates . Plus , the duality of light is not visualizing it a normal plane which you are HPW (in your paper assumes)

I don't need to read story books when it comes to the Riemann Hypothesis. I know what it is. And why it is so hard to prove.

The Riemann Hypothesis deals with only the distribution of Zeros in the Riemann Zeta function. It is named after Bernhard Riemann, who tried to establish a relationship between its zeros and the distribution of prime numbers. AKS primality test which is a deterministic primality-proving algorithm already exists which can determine whether a number is prime or composite within polynomial time.

Since you mentioned Ramanujam if you can explain it to me- what an Ihara zeta function in simple terms ( a normal graduate math student who has taken number theory would know this ) - I would believe you can at least talk math with me. If you do not know about it - here read about it and then you can explain to me. - Ihara zeta function - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Later we can talk about cyclotomic fields and Hilbert Polya Conjecture ... and their applications in the Riemann Hypothesis.

I claim that neutrons are not neutral but instead alternating positive/negative field sources and thier job is to keep the positive protons inside the nucleuos.

I never claim Helical Particle Waves is mine but I spend 1-week face to face discussion with the late Len Gaasenbeekand togther we produced extensions to it to show the meaning of 1) Electric Charge, 2) Magnetic Moment, 3) Mass

Why did I ask about light? because it underpins all matters. Light is first then condensed energy is matter.

You didn't answer my question about what is so special about prime numbers?

I also never claim to be a mathemtician but I am happy to agrue that the main stumblling block for number theorist is the odd/even clasification. It blinds them from the bigger picture of primes and composites.

I like to think of primes are mother of their multiples. So 2 is the mother of all even numbers (except itself of course), odds are misleading because they are only not divisible by 2. What about those number that are not divisible by other prime numbers like 3? Shouldn't they also have a name?

All mothers are equally important not just 2 and all their multiples are even with respect to them.

Now please tell me which is better to use abscure non-trivial zero notitions to shut the public out or what I just explained to you above. Please tell us if you evenr hear this explination from any mathematician.

As for physics, it is my pet subject and I have been invited by the Eureapean Space Agency for my "Valuable" experiment propasal that I hope it will prove that time-dileation is a time-measurement dilation and thus relativity has to be re-evaluted.

The reason I asked about 0^0 or 0! was not trivial as you thought. I wanted to show that the math we are using is built on flaws, just like the geometry which assume a point to have a zero length and yet defines a non-zero length line as an infinite number of zeros !!!

We need to unite to understand the world and if you look at my book "Soul and Spirit" you can see how superstring theory can help us visualize the 5 different domains we, jinn, angels, barzakh, dreams live in.

I never claim to know it all, I know what I know and have put everything I know in my book for furture generations as this generation is based on competitions and thus will self-destruct soon in sha Allah.

Salam to all,

Ali Adams
God > infinity

 

[aliadams]

Number of words in this = 1286

1286 was the year King Rudolph I of Germany declares all Jews to be "serfs of the Treasury", thus negating all their political freedoms.

Coincidence? I think not.

If you are going to take any year or months then MUST be in Hijri not Gregorian unless you are using the Bible.

Salam

Ali

 

[A for Anarchy]

I claim that neutrons are not neutral but instead alternating positive/negative field sources and thier job is to keep the positive protons inside the nucleuos.

I never claim Helical Particle Waves is mine but I spend 1-week face to face discussion with the late Len Gaasenbeekand togther we produced extensions to it to show the meaning of 1) Electric Charge, 2) Magnetic Moment, 3) Mass

Why did I ask about light? because it underpins all matters. Light is first then condensed energy is matter.

You didn't answer my question about what is so special about prime numbers?

I also never claim to be a mathemtician but I am happy to agrue that the main stumblling block for number theorist is the odd/even clasification. It blinds them from the bigger picture of primes and composites.

I like to think of primes are mother of their multiples. So 2 is the mother of all even numbers (except itself of course), odds are misleading because they are only not divisible by 2. What about those number that are not divisible by other prime numbers like 3? Shouldn't they also have a name?

All mothers are equally important not just 2 and all their multiples are even with respect to them.

Now please tell me which is better to use abscure non-trivial zero notitions to shut the public out or what I just explained to you above. Please tell us if you evenr hear this explination from any mathematician.

As for physics, it is my pet subject and I have been invited by the Eureapean Space Agency for my "Valuable" experiment propasal that I hope it will prove that time-dileation is a time-measurement dilation and thus relativity has to be re-evaluted.

The reason I asked about 0^0 or 0! was not trivial as you thought. I wanted to show that the math we are using is built on flaws, just like the geometry which assume a point to have a zero length and yet defines a non-zero length line as an infinite number of zeros !!!

We need to unite to understand the world and if you look at my book "Soul and Spirit" you can see how superstring theory can help us visualize the 5 different domains we, jinn, angels, barzakh, dreams live in.

I never claim to know it all, I know what I know and have put everything I know in my book for furture generations as this generation is based on competitions and thus will self-destruct soon in sha Allah.

Salam to all,

Ali Adams
God > infinity

There is no flaw in 0^0 for a mathematician. For a lay man like you who just knows the outskirts of mathematics, it is weird.

Ask any mathematician, for him 0^0 would be trivial.

The reason they have Mathematics Phds is because it too like any subject needs thorough understanding and research. So it is not a Mathematician's duty to be trivial about his findings. Understanding what Prime numbers are may be trivial ( mother of numbers - ftw! ) but there is a lot of research for which even using language would be a problem for the likes of you, if were to have a discussion ( If I say something like - Computing endomorphism rings of elliptic curves under the GRH , you probably would have no clue about it)

Life is simple. Yes. Studies is not. You seek for answers where there are none. I would request you to read up more. More than just story books. I can suggest number theory texts if you want and I can clarify the doubts you have or direct you to better people - if your doubts are genuine.

We need to unite to understand the world and if you look at my book "Soul and Spirit" you can see how superstring theory can help us visualize the 5 different domains we, jinn, angels, barzakh, dreams live in

DREAMS????

Please do not get me started on what different dimensions mean ; and by connecting it with dreams , barakhs etc - you are committing scientific shirk.

 

[aliadams]

Even i am muslim and i find this stupid!

Let's test your Islam then.

Do you wait for at least 0.5 a second for a reply when you send your greatings to the Prophet (pbuh+f) at the end of your prayers.

Does anyone here do?

Please ignore all the numbers and 2012 findings for now and read my short book Soul and Spirit to learn things your scholars never asked their scholars about. http://www.heliwave.com/Soul.and.Spirit.pdf. Some who read it say this stuff should be taught to every human in the world not just Muslims, and some gave me some really useful feedback, but of course some are ... need I say anyting ...

In the book I explain with Quranic evidence the difference between Death and Wafaat (Return to God), Dreams and Visions, Year (3am) and Year (Sena), and above all soul and spirit and much beside in sha Allah.

Please if you do want to follow the thread just read this book to understand the Quran better in sha Allah.

Salam

Ali Adams
God > infinity

 

[A for Anarchy]

Let's test your Islam then.

Do you wait for at least 0.5 a second for a reply when you send your greatings to the Prophet (pbuh+f) at the end of your prayers.

Does anyone here do?

Please ignore all the numbers and 2012 findings for now and read my short book Soul and Spirit to learn things your scholars never asked their scholars about. http://www.heliwave.com/Soul.and.Spirit.pdf. Some who read it say this stuff should be taught to every human in the world not just Muslims, and some gave me some really useful feedback, but of course some are ... need I say anyting ...

In the book I explain with Quranic evidence the difference between Death and Wafaat (Return to God), Dreams and Visions, Year (3am) and Year (Sena), and above all soul and spirit and much beside in sha Allah.

Please if you do want to follow the thread just read this book to understand the Quran better in sha Allah.

Salam

Ali Adams
God > infinity

Why would you want to test anyone's Islam?

Who are you to question his faith in the Almighty?

 

[aliadams]

There is no flaw in 0^0 for a mathematician. For a lay man like you who just knows the outskirts of mathematics, it is weird.

The reason they have Mathematics Phds is because it too like any subject needs thorough understanding and research. So it is not a Mathematician's duty to be trivial about his findings. Understanding what Prime numbers may be trivial ( mother of numbers - ftw! ) but there is a lot of research for which even using language would be a problem for the likes of you, if were to have a discussion ( If I say something like - Computing endomorphism rings of elliptic curves under the GRH , you probably would have no clue about it)

Life is simple. Yes. Studies is not. You seek for answers where there are none. I would request you to read up more. More than just story books. I can suggest number theory texts if you want and I can clarify the doubts you have or direct you to better people - if your doubts are genuine.

DREAMS????

Please do not get me started on what different dimensions mean ; and by connecting it with dreams , barakhs etc - you are committing scientific shirk.

I know why they need to make them so but that doesn't make is any more justifiable.

Don't even think I am asking you simple questions and your "What is worth answer about Prime numbers are mothers of their multiples" shows two things:
1) You never thought of it like that.
2) You still hold tight to the misleading odd and even number calssification. This is a special case and should never be allowed in higher mathematics.
Think of the real odds are the mothers (primes) and the real evens as the children (composites) evenly divisible by their mothers.

As for comitting science shirk when sceince totally ignores the spiritual worlds (soul and spirit) I am happy to do scientific shirk eveny moment of my life.

I serve God, not closed mind materialstic mere mortals.

Ali Adams
God > infinity

Oh look, I am making a scietific shirk by say God > infinity !!!
I bet you cannot see beyond infinity when it is right in front of you in your relativity theory (see what happens when v goes higher than c).

Ali

 

[aliadams]

I want everyone to evaluate themselves before saying there are Muslims.

Islam is not by name. Islam is submission to the Will of God alone, which you seem busy submitting to you worldy masters going about your blindly and happily attacking those who don't agree with your narrow scieitific point of view.

Ali

 

[A for Anarchy]

I know why they need to make them so but that doesn't make is any more justifiable.

Don't even think I am asking you simple questions and your "What is worth answer about Prime numbers are mothers of their multiples" shows two things:
1) You never thought of it like that.
2) You still hold tight to the misleading odd and even number calssification. This is a special case and should never be allowed in higher mathematics.
Think of the real odds are the mothers (primes) and the real evens as the children (composites) evenly divisible by their mothers.

As for comitting science shirk when sceince totally ignores the spiritual worlds (soul and spirit) I am happy to do scientific shirk eveny moment of my life.

I serve God, not closed mind materialstic mere mortals.

Ali Adams
God > infinity

Oh look, I am making a scietific shirk by say God > infinity !!!
I bet you cannot see beyond infinity when it is right in front of you in your relativity theory (see what happens when v goes higher than c).

Ali

If you believe anything at all, God > you and comparing God to a plain number concept of infinity is weird (and probably shirk)

1) You never thought of it like that.
2) You still hold tight to the misleading odd and even number calssification. This is a special case and should never be allowed in higher mathematics.
Think of the real odds are the mothers (primes) and the real evens as the children (composites) evenly divisible by their mothers.

Okay you can call Primes as Odd and Composites as Even (Use control F , Find and Replace ) - what is your great accomplishment through this? Calling them mothers and children?
You are just going the round about way and telling me what a 6 year old child will tell me.

V>c , tachyons get formed - its existence is there all over scientific fiction, so what are you telling me?

 

[aliadams]

If you believe anything at all, God > you and comparing God to a plain number concept of infinity is weird (and probably shirk)

Okay you can call Primes as Odd and Composites as Even (Use control F , Find and Replace ) - what is your great accomplishment through this? Calling them mothers and children?
You are just going the round about way and telling me what a 6 year old child will tell me.

V>c , tachyons get formed - its existence is there all over scientific fiction, so what are you telling me?

Infinity is unreachable so it is not a number, don't kid yourself. Many say God = infinity and I say no Allah Akbar means God is greater (not greatest becuase this would imply there are other Gods) whereas Greater leave it open-ended which mean no matter what you can think of God is still greater.

As for the PROFOUND difference between the new way of think of numbers and the current misleading one is we no longer need to blind ourselves by so many theories of odss and evens and the sum of their type snad playground of evey even > 2 is a sum of two primes etc etc etc. All this frutless maths.

Allah swt swaers by the co-dependents and independents if Quran 89:3 for a BIG reason, and if we need to progress in maths then we better drop our little babies odds and evens. There is nothing special about divisibility bu 2 only. The importnat stuff is divisibility by all numbers or not.

Even divisibility by 1 is misleading as it is never makes a number smaller. 1 is the mother of all mothers (primes) and although never produces children in multiplicative way, it is the most indivisible numbers, 1 is a pure prime. Oh I didn't realize I just made another scientific shirk!

Wish you grandfather is watching you from heaven now and se whay a hole you are digging for yourself ignoring your own essence, Soul.

Ali Adams
God > infinity

 

[aliadams]

when v > c, tachyons get formed - its existence is there all over scientific fiction, so what are you telling me?

You missed the point again, I am not sking what happens I am asking what is beyond infinity in the following relativity equation aprt (Lambda):

Something_t = Something_at_rest * Gamma

where is

1 / ( sqrt(1 - (v^2/c^2) ) )


Plugin v = c and you get infinity
Plugin v > c and you get sqrt(negative) = imaginary

Have you ever thought of imaginary numbers ar beyond +infinity and before -infinity?
Nothing imaginary if it exist. It just goes into different domain.

Maybe this way of looking at imaginary numbers instead of the y-axis can shed some light on why the eachyons are real but in another domains.

Also all this particle zoo business is simply patching wrong theories to start with.

I bet you still haven't read how Helical Paticle Waves exmplins what mass is! See which is better my exmplination or their heedless pursuit of the God's particle (Higgs boson).

I still would like you to answer my suggestion of neutrons as alternating charged particles instead of the yet another zoo particle (gluon).

Ali Adams

God >

 

[A for Anarchy]

I am sure putting v>c was what every noob Physicist would have done when he first got hands on it. So do not feed me crap, which I used to debate when I was a 16 year old.

Edit: Current Physical models exist which are valid only for v<c.

Read about the Standard Model of physics. Clear your misconceptions on neutrons and gluons. A neutron is a baryon (3 quarks - 2 down, 1 up quark). Gluons are exchange particles with mass -0.

It would be tiring to educate you about the Quantum Field theory (in particular - the Higg's Mechanism for explaining mass) and the Standard Model of Physics.

Higg's Boson - "the God Particle " - existence has been claimed by the Standard model of physics which also claimed the existence of many others including W and Z bosons, gluon, and the top and charm quarks before these particles were observed.

The Standard Model of particle physics predicts a tiny separation of positive and negative charge within the neutron leading to a permanent electric dipole moment.

You are not claiming anything new.

Gluons are exchange particles.

You are confused.

 

[A for Anarchy]

Anyway I am surprised you did not bring Godel's incompleteness theorem to explain God , yet.

Isn't that what all pseudophysicists/pseudomathematicians do?