What's new

Questioning the creation of Pakistan

Status
Not open for further replies.
Lol...
Start questioning the creation of India and then what?

Exactly..india should have been paritioned into 6 or more units across the lines of ethinic and cultrual division. The biggest dividing factors would be south vs north. The add some Maoist in the mix, some Kasmiri essense and Kerala bananas!

it was jinnah who went back to london n came back around 1935 when independence to india was a certanity after some heck of effort from gandhiji in civil disobedience movement except for direct action i dont see any worth while contribution towards independece movement n direct action was in itself a opertunistic thing

He went for his education / practice and there is no bar in that. Much to twist the facts to paint a new picture. Jinnah had huge pro-west influences so there is no shame if he shuttled back and forth between England and British India.

On the humor side
When ever you asked a Keralite about his nationality his response is "Kerla" rather than "Indian" :azn:
 
Last edited:
Exactly..india should have been paritioned into 6 or more units across the lines of ethinic and cultrual division. The biggest dividing factors would be south vs north. The add some Maoist in the mix, some Kasmiri essense and Kerala bananas!

When ever you asked a Keralite about his nationality his response is "Kerla" rather than "Indian" :azn:

What do u know about India that u speak so much about her?Indians are one irrespective of religion ,language,color,dressing sense etc..
 
What do u know about India that u speak so much about her?Indians are one irrespective of religion ,language,color,dressing sense etc..

India after its created had to resort to communist defintion of unity to keep the nation bonded. And now it uses economic oppurtunism to keep nation bonded. As the idealogies are running out of chances to root increasing internal frictions, the bigoted influences of hindu domination aka hindu tuva are gaining grounds. The future of India after the explosive growth phase cools down will be very troublesome.
 
This is distorted history.Prithvi Raj chauhan never ruled Sindh or the frontier provinces.He may have ruled parts of present day Pakistani Punjab.Ghori attacked India only because of her wealth and to spread Islam.

Distorted history through the eyes of an Indian, not us. This depends on whose versions of events you look at......I respect yours but don't agree with it Sir.

Mohammed Ali Jinnah looked out for the best interests of Muslims and did things in their best interest. Just like the Hindu's who had won the elctions in India should have done in 1935/36 when they became fanatics and fundamentalists in their ideology of Hindu way of life. This could be seen as a sign for Jinnah Sahib to part ways for the betterment of Muslims in the region.

And please..........spare us the sermon about looting Indian wealth crap.........its like saying India is looting Kashmiri resources hence why it is holding onto it.

Give us all a break...............
 
India after its created had to resort to communist defintion of unity to keep the nation bonded. And now it uses economic oppurtunism to keep nation bonded. As the idealogies are running out of chances to root increasing internal frictions, the bigoted influences of hindu domination aka hindu tuva are gaining grounds. The future of India after the explosive growth phase cools down will be very troublesome.

Agreed, the recent comments by Chidambaram about the Saffron Hindu threat clearly backs that up. They even have terrorists in form of a Political outfit, the BJP.
 
i think its time all muslims and Pakistanies start question about creation of india......it was hindustan and ruled by Muslims b4 british came in, so it should be handed back to muslims in 1947 ...

i can see from history that hindu/mislums/sikhs/ etc etc religons lived in peace under islamic rulers but now i see in hindu ruled part of our hindustan muslims/sikhs etc nimority groups are under threat every day....

please can any indian fellow tell me why muslims in india are not allowed to open bank accounts?
why muslims in india cannot go to universities
why muslims in india are treated like animals
long list of questions......

The land has been inherited by Hindus before any Islam came so by that logic the whole land of yours in Pakistan belongs to Indians as per your logic. So leave the land the move off... :devil:

Cut the crap...:azn:
 
The land has been inherited by Hindus before any Islam came so by that logic the whole land of yours in Pakistan belongs to Indians as per your logic. So leave the land the move off... :devil:

Cut the crap...:azn:

If we go by your logic Sir, then Buddhism is historically more ancient then Hinduism and before the time of the Gita and Lord Krishna, and even before them all were pre-Aryan faiths and Shamanic based faiths. This also includfes followers of Hermes and the Emerald tablet.

So, how about Hindus getting the hell out of that region also..........:flame:
 
If we go by your logic Sir, then Buddhism is historically more ancient then Hinduism and before the time of the Gita and Lord Krishna, and even before them all were pre-Aryan faiths and Shamanic based faiths. This also includfes followers of Hermes and the Emerald tablet.

So, how about Hindus getting the hell out of that region also..........:flame:
First of all you need a history lesson and that too not from blogs but creditable sources.
second if you correct then also land belongs to us because buddism was from our land only not some aliens.
thirdly hinduism is older than budhism. selective reading of history is injurious to health.
 
If we go by your logic Sir, then Buddhism is historically more ancient then Hinduism and before the time of the Gita and Lord Krishna, and even before them all were pre-Aryan faiths and Shamanic based faiths. This also includfes followers of Hermes and the Emerald tablet.

So, how about Hindus getting the hell out of that region also..........:flame:

Sir you need to refresh your mind.For your info Hinduism is the parent religion of Buddhism.lord Buddha was a Hindu prince of the Kshatriya class before he started preaching the new religion.Hinduism is considered the oldest religion along with Zoroastrianism .
 
Totally Agree with Black Blood.Anyone who questions existence of Pakistan should be banned ASAP.Pakistan was made with great effort and a lot of sacrifice.No one should be allowed to insult the creation of Pakistan or for that matter question the legitimacy of Pakistan.
 
The land has been inherited by Hindus before any Islam came so by that logic the whole land of yours in Pakistan belongs to Indians as per your logic. So leave the land the move off... :devil:

Cut the crap...:azn:

So we go back to hindu vs muslim not by anyone else but the Indians themselves. So that give legitimacy to Jinnah vision of two seprate nations unable to co-exist. So how about we throw a big "Thank you Jinnah" party on 25th Dec 2010. The man who changed the face of Muslims world and subcontient with bare hands. :pakistan::pakistan:

Muslim world would be in a lot different shape today if Pakistan was not created. :pakistan:
 
If we go by your logic Sir, then Buddhism is historically more ancient then Hinduism and before the time of the Gita and Lord Krishna, and even before them all were pre-Aryan faiths and Shamanic based faiths. This also includfes followers of Hermes and the Emerald tablet.

So, how about Hindus getting the hell out of that region also..........:flame:

you got to learn a lot of history.:pop:
 
Pakistan would have been part of a Federated india if Nehru had agreed to 1946 Cabinet Mission proposals.

but then modern pakistanis would have to deal with Saffronists like K.S.Lal who radicalized an entire hindu generation with his distortion of history.
 
Totally Agree with Black Blood.Anyone who questions existence of Pakistan should be banned ASAP.Pakistan was made with great effort and a lot of sacrifice.No one should be allowed to insult the creation of Pakistan or for that matter question the legitimacy of Pakistan.

After seeing bharti uneasiness even on this suggestion thread i am 200% agreed with Blackblood.


This was suppose to be suggestion but Indian replies based on their 63-year-old delusion about Pakistan proves every word of Blackblood what he said.
 
I am not going to comment on creation of Pakistan but since Indian muslim condition keeps coming up, I just want to post some facts on socio-economic indicators

percapita income 2004-2005 survey for Indian muslims 64000INR or $1368 USD

Pakistan per capita income 2008 estimate $1027 USD

Literacy
Indian muslims 2001 census 59% male 73.4% female 50.2%

Pakistan 2005 estimate 49.9% male 63% female 36%

and well I don't really want to talk about number of people killed but since riots are brought about frequently.
In the most bloodies conflict in Kashmir around 100 000 people including those killed by militants and possibly non-muslims as wellover a period of 20 years

In East Pakistan over a period of three years, the deaths were close to a million.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom