A few days ago your kind was harping over some distorted news published in an Indian news paper about sikhs wanting to migrate to India, it wasn't surprising none of you decided not to comment on this one, because it proves contrary to what many of you were trying to state here.
My 'kind'? You don't know me so I suggest there's no point in trying identify my 'kind'.
I have made no comments about wanting Sikhs to migrate here. IIRC, if you go to that thread, I have said the opposite. I.e. they are Pakistan's business.
And what do you mean by do all Pakistanis think the same way, our sikhs not Pakistanis? Your question should have been like this do majority in Pakistan which happens to be Muslim think the same way, and the answer to that is yes they do. Just read the comments of many here you will realize.
I should have phrased this question better. No I did not imply that Pakistanis claim that these Sikhs are not fellow citizens.
I asked the questions of Pakistani Muslims vis a vis their self identity, i.e. how they define themselves.
To my knowledge, (a) There is a segment in Pakistan that believes that it is Muslim first, Pakistani second, (b) The Muslim identity is certainly a very important part of who Pakistanis think they are as a people and a nation. This is reinforced in almost every aspect that I read or see (TV/ Online) about Pakistan.
Given that, it is ironical that Pakistanis who fall in category (a) (at the very least) should take pride in Pakistani Sikhs stating that
they are Pakistanis first. Even with (b), it makes for a considerable sidestep in conventional thinking.*
My position on my self identity has been very clear; my thinking, upbringing, education and socialization as an Indian makes me an Indian first, anything else second. Which is the reason I can appreciate the position that Sikhs in Pakistan have taken. For me too they are Pakistanis first.
Nb: I do not claim that the majority of people on
this site think like this. My observation was more in general.