↑
LOL.
You specifically talked about 'we'; so who was the 'them'? You didn't discriminate; you went right ahead and said that you 'were the only one of the two'. Not very specific, was it?
Ok since you want to dissect my words lets do so:
As you wish.
In my
current profession, I have grown used to dealing with the temper tantrums of those with high opinions of themselves who see their arguments disappearing under scrutiny, and insist on a review, of course with the unsaid message that the review should reverse the earlier result.
Every failing grade gets this response: not a whetted desire to do better, but in some way to challenge things and to get the Sun rising triumphantly in the west.
It is not an impossible wish; miracles might happen. To those burdened with the task, it can be unbearably dreary, but sadly, this is inevitable.
In answer to a peace request:
↑
India should change mind about war. We know that Indian have huge navy + Airforce . But in war only humanity loses. You can win war
but with the price of millions of life and it effects for decades. I don't think this war is easy for India against nuclear armed neighbor, & weapons we both have. Both will suffer.
Lesson number 1: India having a huge navy and a large air force does not mean that India was the chest-thumping belligerent. India put together these ill-spared resources out of precious funds because the bad neighbour was a menace.
So, this has to be pointed out; thank you for the dithyramb, but you have to modify your behaviour, not point fearfully at the possible consequences after being at fault.
You wrote:
↑
As for your post,
try giving your neighbour a chance to live peacefully.
To which I answered:
↑
We arent the chest beating war monkeys
We are the only one of the two that has been giving the olive branch but some obnoxious dude - your PM- clearly doesnt want peace
Lesson number 2:
You cannot for seventy years be a belligerent, and then point to your latest action as being in some way an exculpation for all that went before.
In context to the on going discussion....Pray do tell who this peace loving neighbour is....And I said w.r.t us "we arent the chest beating war monkeys" We are the ones who gave the olive branch but YOUR PM clearly doesnt want peace....Now you tell me which part is NOT clear!
The part where you think that by shoving 70 years of bad behaviour under the carpet, you can fool anybody.
↑
Don't you think your claim above is worse than thin? There's a word for this; 'disingenuous', not very much of an ingenue.
There is a word for your behaviour...It isnt high level dictionary word...in layman's terms you are crying foul!
Lesson number 4: I didn't cry foul; I merely pointed out that being the innocent abroad is not a tenable pose. There was nothing foul about it, merely foolish, so there was no question of my accusing you of a foul. Crying 'Foul' is not the same as pointing out that someone is being 'Foolish' in hiding behind a pose of being too innocent to get the import of rash and badly-chosen words.
If you want to know whether or not I was war-mongering, read my posts. You have every opportunity to read them; they are posts on PDF after all.
If you claim you werent as I did say I was referring to them [in context]....then why did you feel the burn?
Lesson number 5: If you wish to insult, do so; do not insult someone and then back away and deny it hotly when challenged.
The wording shows clearly what was meant.
At least 1 thing is clear, I didnt call you anything specifically. You just felt the burn prob due to your own conscious [see I still think you are human enough to feel that]
You on the other hand....
Lesson number 6: Sadly, what you did was the exact opposite of what you claim you did. It was a specific clubbing together of a whole nation, with all of its nationals tarred with the same broad brush. To say that it was not meant for an individual specifically comes late in the day, after the unreasonable and untenable nature of the accusation was pointed out. You should have thought of it before blaring out that 1.3 billion Indians were war-mongers, in flat contradiction of all the protests against war-like situations that have been built up having been prominently on display.
Lesson number 7: The word is 'conscience', not 'conscious'. It is true that while I labour under the burden of the former, for instance, in embarking on this post, I sometimes wish I had lacked the latter. It would be so blissful.
