Yup, he doesn’t want to discuss technical language because it’s clear to see in plain English that he doesn’t have a point to make. Or a leg to stand on. So what aboutisms and sarcasm is all he throws. What about the 5 judges, what about this, that? As if the judges have not been involved in shady decisions in our country before.
Incidentally, this is a very female level type of argument. The last line of defense my wife will pitch out when she knows she’s wrong.
Except cults are normally people who are uneducated or on the fringe. Cults are not mainstream and primarily educated middle class people that form a plurality of the constituency. Try again.
Dude find me a single ruling in the entire commonwealth and the US that overruled the rulings of Parliament.
Don’t reveal PII to weirdos online.
Another what aboutJudges were best during Panama case decision only?IK ny a kay judiciary ko bhi khaarab ker dya?
Sadmay ho abhi tak?
People who are laughing need yo know that i have very bad habit of being always right
Bro actually, I remember reading in a survey someone wrote about Punjab though that 5-10% diff is all it takes to go from landslide in one direction to the other.
Nope- these are laws or orders passed which the SC can declare illegal or not (in violation of Constitution or not). They don’t interfere with the inner workings of parliament- how a speaker conducts a session in the house or senate. Find an example of that sort please.Trump’s Travel Ban Is Upheld by Supreme Court
Trump’s Travel Ban Is Upheld by Supreme Court (Published 2018)
In a 5-to-4 vote, the Supreme Court ruled that President Trump acted lawfully in imposing limits on travel from several predominantly Muslim countries.www.nytimes.com
Even Trump decision was challenged in court but it came in his favor with 5-4 result.
FYI:
USA Supreme Court can interfere if the actions of the President of the USA is contrary to law (which includes the Constitution).
UK:
Johnson's suspension of parliament unlawful, supreme court rules
Boris Johnson's suspension of parliament unlawful, supreme court rules
Judges rule on PM’s decision to prorogue parliament for five weeks at height of Brexit crisiswww.theguardian.com
I don't know if it works for you
That’s executive decisions, not rulings of speakers or acts of Parliament. Do you even know the difference?Trump’s Travel Ban Is Upheld by Supreme Court
Trump’s Travel Ban Is Upheld by Supreme Court (Published 2018)
In a 5-to-4 vote, the Supreme Court ruled that President Trump acted lawfully in imposing limits on travel from several predominantly Muslim countries.
Even Trump decision was challenged in court but it came in his favor with 5-4 result.
FYI:
USA Supreme Court can interfere if the actions of the President of the USA is contrary to law (which includes the Constitution).
UK:
Johnson's suspension of parliament unlawful, supreme court rules
Boris Johnson's suspension of parliament unlawful, supreme court rules
Judges rule on PM’s decision to prorogue parliament for five weeks at height of Brexit crisis
I don't know if it works for you
Yeah it’s clear you have no understanding of how legal systems work, enjoy your ignorance.You see even Trump Travel ban was for national security issue but still USA SC took it.
No one is above the law and Dy Speaker is nothing. He was not following constitution by not doing voting and his duties accordingly. Supreme Court just told him he didn't follow the constitution.
Ok
You can say
Water is not wet
I Say
Water is wet
You can say again
Water is not wet
Koi SC interfere nahi kari gi idher...
So speaker is above President, PM. He can break laws and constitutions? Sahi ja rahay ho...
Again Bakwas deflections. Trumps order was equivalent of an ordinance in our setup which the court can rule against the constitution. Find an example where courts interfere in conduct of a session of parliament.You see even Trump Travel ban was for national security issue but still USA SC took it.
No one is above the law and Dy Speaker is nothing. He was not following constitution by not doing voting and his duties accordingly. Supreme Court just told him he didn't follow the constitution.
Ok
You can say
Water is not wet
I Say
Water is wet
You can say again
Water is not wet
Koi SC interfere nahi kari gi idher...
So speaker is above President, PM. He can break laws and constitutions? Sahi ja rahay ho...
Aaj ka Qeemay walk naan halal kar liya aap nein.
Sach karwa lagta hai.
Its not your fault guys. Your leadership is following Trump model and using twitter handles to post fake things. But but
OSINT on twitter is filled with indian PJeets doing propaganda. While OSINT in real life (which you don't have any idea about) is way different than OSINT on twitter.So what?
There are many fake OSINT on twitter too. Twitter is a joke.
The Big, Bad Bot Problem
Can Twitter Solve Its Big, Bad Bot Problem?
The social network’s effort to address the problem is long overdue, but years of neglect will make it tough to eradicate these menacing machineswww.theringer.com
More than half of Elon Musk’s Twitter followers appear to be fake
More than half of Elon Musk’s Twitter followers are fake
World’s richest person pledged to ‘defeat the spam bots or die trying’ after takeover announced, though succeeding could reduce his followers by halfwww.independent.co.uk
