Gandhi G in da house
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 5, 2010
- Messages
- 9,475
- Reaction score
- -24
- Country
- Location
I
Extremely disappointed in some of the belligerent comments here from some Indians. I honestly expected better...
So did we.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I
Extremely disappointed in some of the belligerent comments here from some Indians. I honestly expected better...
Stop exposing you stupidity and dishonesty with an utterly biased reading of history.
The leader of the burgeoning Swaminarayan sect, Sahajanand Swami, was influential in the eventual eradication of sati. He argued that the practice had no Vedic standing and only God could take a life he had given. He also argued that widows could lead lives that would eventually lead to salvation. Sir John Malcolm, the Governor of Bombaysupported Sahajanand Swami in this endeavor, whose domino effect led to other social reforms.[30]
From about 1812, the Bengali reformer Raja Rammohan Roy started his own campaign against the practice. He was motivated by the experience of seeing his own sister-in-law being forced to commit sati. Among his actions, he visited Calcutta cremation grounds to persuade widows against immolation, formed watch groups to do the same, and wrote and disseminated articles to show that it was not required by scripture.
From the same link, Btw.
You may know slavery was non-existent in our society throughout history except for practiced by foreign invaders. Greek ambassador Megasthenes in 300BC wrote that he saw no slaves in India.
Point stands.British intervention was needed to put a stop to it.
Maybe this way you would understand that while some indians practiced Sati,others were against it just like some americans had slaves while others were against such practices.
Because British were ruling India so their intervention was needed, those were the days of Hindu reformation, Raja Rammohan Roy thoughts were ahead of the time.
Point stands.British intervention was needed to put a stop to it.
Maybe this way you would understand that while some indians practiced Sati,others were against it just like some americans had slaves while others were against such practices.
The caste system is equally appaling.
Ofcourse , British were ruling India at that point so we could have never outlawed Sati without their support.
On the other hand, the British introduced regressive laws like the anti-gay laws in India which we are still struggling to remove today.
The caste system is equally appaling.
Yes! Because while white americans ended slavery by themselves you actually needed the british to hang some indians to end appaling practices like Sati
Sati (practice) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Sir Charles James Napier :
What do you mean by equally caste system was bad but not worst like slavery.
Dear you should refrain from commenting on subjects of which you have no clue. Stick to the topic, comment something constructive. Else play some video game to take out your frustration.
I find them equally bad.Personal opinion.
Irelevant post full of butthurt.I will ignore your advice,sue me.
Well it is said that you can take a donkey to the water, but you can't make him drink it. You have proved it right...carry on.
here you go they gather infront of indan HC
So now white Americans will teach a lesson to us on slavery ?
Biggest joke of the last 4 centuries
Yes! Because while white americans ended slavery by themselves you actually needed the british to hang some indians to end appaling practices like Sati
Sati (practice) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Sir Charles James Napier :