MagicMarker
BANNED
- Joined
- Oct 16, 2016
- Messages
- 935
- Reaction score
- -16
- Country
- Location
Randomly picking up a charter and reading sentences will get you nowhere. I already said that CBI is not the de facto investigation agency in that matters. Do you know what the word means? Fact is, these offences are dime a dozen, the CBI will not usurp the jurisdiction of ED or EOW unless specifically directed by government or court. The CBI simply does not have the bandwidth to deal with things that can be investigated by other agencies. Since in this case it is not the court which has directed it, it means that the government has. If you can direct me to any instance in the past few decades where the CBI has investigated an economic offence without court or government direction then I will agree to your position.
Again, I don't expect you to understand any of this, you are free to believe that it is the government's role to use state machinery against opponents. Good for you.
LOL.... so the CBI charter is not the guiding light, your random post in pdf is
Enforcement directorate job is to primarily investigate Money Laundering and FEMA violation.
Economic Offices of all kind comes under the preview of the premier investigating agency in India, i.e. the CBI.
This particular investigation by CBI was w.r.t a complaint by a shareholder of ICICI bank and NDTV.
As per the CBI statement, "The investigation are not regarding the default in loan repayment; but relate to the wrongful gain of ₹ 48 crore to the promoters — Dr. Prannoy Roy, Smt Radhika Roy, M/s RRPR Holdings Pvt Ltd and a corresponding wrongful loss to the ICICI bank arising from their collusion and criminal conspiracy."
Criminal conspiracy is firmly the responsibility of CBI and not ED.
Their statement provides further clarification "NDTV in its statement questions the jurisdiction of CBI by stating that ICICI is a private bank. It is clarified that the Honourable Supreme Court in the case of Ramesh Gelli vs CBI of 2016, held that the provisions of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 are applicable to the officials of private banks. Therefore, CBI has jurisdiction to take up investigation of the cases of private banks."
SO you see, your claims fall FLAT.
Regarding the "bandwidth" of CBI, the CBI Director is a better person to make that decision on which cases to try and what not to. Now unless he has abdicated that role in YOUR Favor, you again have no place making any sort of directives FOR the CBI.
Finally I am glad you have admitted that the NDTV was an "Opponent" of the Govt. That is a strange place to be. I can understand a Foreign nation to be an "opponent", but why is a Media house an "opponent" of the Indian govt. ? What is their AGENDA ?
Either way, there is going to be NO SPECIAL PRIVILEGES provided to NDTV. Let the law take its own course. Isn't that what they wanted for Modi when he was being put on Media trial ? ....... those who live by the sword, die by it.
PS: BTW here is some good news. The Enforcement Directorate has issued showcause notice to NDTV Ltd for bringing foreign investments of around Rs 2,030 crore into the parent company between 2007-10 allegedly in violation of Foreign Exchange Management Act (Fema) guideline
I hope this settles the role of the ED in this case.
But it gets worse ,
http://www.moneylife.in/article/sebi-finally-initiates-action-against-ndtv-promoters/47196.html
SEBI finally initiates action against NDTV, promoters
The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) has finally initiated approved enforcement action against New Delhi Television Ltd (NDTV) and its promoters Prannoy Roy and Radhika Roy and RRPR Holdings Pvt Ltd, for the company's failure to multiple disclosure information to Exchanges.
In a notice issued on 8 June 2016, the market regulator said, "...(SEBI) conducted an examination of certain non-compliance by you in the matter of NDTV Ltd and prima facie found that you have violated SEBI Act, 1992 and SEBI (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations, 1997 (Takeover Regulations). In view of this, SEBI has decided to initiate/ launch adjudication proceedings against you under section 15A (b) of the SEBI Act for the alleged violation."