Whatever this means. Let us try to make sense of your remarks.
Talk to whom? About what?
I am saying bluntly that you don't know where Prachanda became a communist. I am saying that China had nothing to do with it. I am saying that you really need to do your research before putting together these disconnected thoughts.
Sorry, but this needs some blunt talk.
Ignorance is not sincerity.
Knowledge is not hypocrisy.
You really need to get your thinking sorted.
And your simple unsupported statement is enough to establish that?
[quoteThere is no point in dilly dallying and showing vulnerability to whatever nations we have in this world .
Nepal want those areas . And India cant hand over that also .
Why not? What is the strategic point of those areas? I am not suggesting handing them over, I am suggesting that your statements do not make any sense.
So you have no opinion about anything that you have not experienced personally?
Well, there goes the Special Theory of Relativity.
That is what I have already pointed out to you. It's all words; nothing happens, only posturing for the camera.
Nothing due to our efforts. Entirely due to the Maldives people themselves.
Again, just words. All governments in India have been democratic. Not all governments in India have made such a mess. Some others have made messes, but not on this scale.[/QUOTE]
Let us agree to disagree.
With due respect sir .There is no such thing of love or hate in this world .Particularly among the nations .
All of our neighbours are looking for one reason or another .
Talk to a lots of them.
Common people can says a lot .
Ok .
Then can you bluntly say the Chinese didnt have any hand in the growth of communism in Nepal?
Knowledge is not hypocrisy but when it twaeks for your own suite then it is hypocrisy.
How can you outrightly says that there is no strategic value in those areas?
Its like what Nehru told about Aksai Chin .
Certain things can only reach to a conclusion only if we have enough documents to support it .
Will mention you after the first Rafale is here .
Sorry ?
Everyone knows what was happened in Maldives
Ya right .
What an irony ,we had the govts that suspended the civil rights .Nurtured LTTE in neighbouring nations .
Years of Khalistan movement .
Ya right .
Everything is because of this govt .
And that was the responsibility of my building watchman?
So? Does that disprove the argument?
Why is it so high for these alone?
You have figures that are different from these?
Or, as usual, you wish you had figures different from these, but since you don't, you feel entitled to make remarks about what it would have been if your wishes had been true.
#######################################################################
The Akhund was the Emir of Swat.
Even by your not very high standards, tonight seems to be a difficult night.
So you would be in the front to blame the watchman when covid takes it toll without any basic ppe or kits or support ?
Damn if you did ,Damn if you dont .One thing I can be sure is I cant become a hypocrite because I didnt support any ism and any idealogies .
Knowledge is nothing if you have any idealogy that controls it .
Still you are just avoiding the core issue .
Your guy said 4 those nations are authoritarian .
So I asked you China was successful because that wasnt authoritarian ?
Arent they authoritarian ?
The usual bunch of stupid Sanghis, intent on preserving Modi's honour; Pakistani fanboys resorting to abuse because they can't think of anything else to say; phony military analysts who haven't got out of short pants but know that conscription armies will help them win the war against India THIS time; Chinese wags fingering me to get a funny word or two - the usual. Nothing useful, unless you would care to look at one of the two or three worthwhile threads, the one on India Pakistan conflicts.
There is no point in blaming or stamping somebodys as Sanghis because their opinion doesnt go along with you .
Nor anyone need to save the honor of PM Modi .
Thanks to the people like you and opposition .
The man is already in another level where there is no more of genuine criticism affect him .