I read some comments that falls perfect case for the hostile, if something wrong would have happened. Instead of thinking in isolated manners & reaching to conclusion too quickly without due consideration of the possible facts, beneficiary of unfortunate incident & the suspect; we need to see as why would have been done so. In my view, if there was any possible security threat in this case; it would have been the best bargain to fuel anti KSA hatred, sabotage possible talks with Iran for peace/resolution of conflict to thwart the war in region and stay undetected.
Then we have our PM that exposed Islamophobia, anti-Islam forces & beside climate change; Kashmir became the most center of attention that exposes Indian crimes. Well, Delhi doesn't have such guts or approach to arrange such kind of incident alone but there are very close friends of Modi that can do so without any heat.
Who wants to ignite the war with Iran in the region and on the same time, wants Pakistan to distance from KSA? because in this case, god forbid if it happened, MBS or Iran, would have been propagated as the suspects. Never undermine the power of propaganda by specific kind of machinery against Pakistan or the whole region as well as Gulf.
Not to forget that it was MBS himself that wanted IK to talk to Iran & on the same time, Trump expressed the same concern so that Pakistan may mediate then, no one in the right mind from KSA, Trump or even Iran; will attempt such kind of sabotage.
