PM Imran Khan vs Opposition No Confidence Vote- Updates and Discussion

[SQ8]

MQM - Altaf or whatever never left!
The control he has over the thugs and target killers of the party only waned a little otherwise there is still a loyalist cadre for him in Karachi.

 

[El Sidd]

Was this around the time when Islamabad was besieged by drug addicts for 126 days? Or when Supreme Court had her walls painted with underwear or when State television was attacked at the behest of foreign nationals spending summers in Pakistan?

 

[FOOLS_NIGHTMARE]

If you Patwaris were so clever your Showbaz Sharif would have become PM and Hamza Showbaz would have become CM Punjab by now

I don't have time to waste on futile debates, just a few points to ponder.
1) Why have his selectors given up.
2)Majority of the party is in tatters.
3)All the political parties of Pakistan have turned against him.
4)All his friends and ATMs are disillusioned.
5)Media support waning fast.

 

[SEOminati]

Another Fake News been spread by Express Tribune :

'Military finds no evidence of foreign conspiracy against PM Imran'​

'Military finds no evidence of foreign conspiracy against PM | The Express Tribune

Relevant quarters say the wrong impression was given about the military leadership endorsing view of the government

tribune.com.pk

Relevant quarters say the wrong impression was given about the military leadership endorsing view of the government

--------------
We all know Express Tribune has links with NYT. Few days back they said so called 'relevant quarters' found no evidence of American involvement

Yeah man, paisa bolta hai. Much looks like Badami's ba-wasooq zaraye.

 

[ghazi52]

.,.,.,.,.,.

,.,.,.,.

 

[Windjammer]

Its true that Rats dessert a sinking ship but what these pest didn't realise is that PTI is no ship, its a submarine.

 

[Mugen]

Beware of this person who is writing a book on Imran, you will forget Reham khan.
View attachment 830578

I am waiting for the book so I can use it as toilet paper.

 

[Norwegian]

1) Why have his selectors given up

Because of repeated abuse of Army by your Maryam Qatari media cell

2)Majority of the party is in tatters

20 or so disgruntled MNAs in a total of 155 is majority?

3)All the political parties of Pakistan have turned against him.

Because they are all corrupt to the core and sellouts to foreign powers

4)All his friends and ATMs are disillusioned.

Because they have joined the same corrupt and sellout opposition parties mentioned above

5)Media support waning fast.

Lost media support years ago when govt stopped giving them billion Rs lifafas like your Mian Mafroor

 

[Patriot forever]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1510640394278928389

We should do all in our power to expose the filth that America has injected in our society.

We know a lot of their sponsored media apparatus which groups are funded by the likes of National Endowment Fund. Aurat March. The Marxists. The presstitutes on their payroll like Shirazi, Mir, Toilet, Safi and a plethora of others on plmn books.

Let's fail and expose them.

 

[TheDarkKnight]

A thread for Aleem khan’s statements?

 

[TheSolution]

We should do all in our power to expose the filth that America has injected in our society.

We know a lot of their sponsored media apparatus which groups are funded by the likes of National Endowment Fund. Aurat March. The Marxists. The presstitutes on their payroll like Shirazi, Mir, Toilet, Safi and a plethora of others on plmn books.

Let's fail and expose them.

Go onto Aurat March's IG page, the latest post and read the comments

I was surprised

 

[Strike X]

Well I think before their famous jalsa of October 2011. Some of the known faces of PTI were

• Fauzia Kasuri
• Justice Wajihuddin
• Shafqat Mehmood
• Arif Alvi
• Naeem ul Haq
• Aleem Khan, Jahangir Tareen and Asad Umar after 2010

How many of these faces do you recognise in their current setup? Justice Sahab was sacked, which is fine. Fauzia left several years ago. When PTI won the election, Naeem Ul Haq was denied entry to Imran Khan's house, and there were videos of him disputing with the security that he was the party leader and so on. He was never really appreciated for his role after PTI came into power. Some Punjab leaders I deliberately ignored to keep the discussion short. Arif Alvi became President, therefore he is immune, and Shafqat Mehmood is generally a silent face.

What we got after the election is

• Fawad Chaudhry (Formerly PPP, Musharraf, PML-Q depending on the atmosphere)
• Shahbaz Gill (loudmouth)
• Faisal Vawda (loudmouth)
• Team of people with loudmouth
• Sheikh Rasheed (APML)
• Parvez Ellahi (PML-Q)
• Hafeez Sheikh / Shaukat Tareen (PPP)
• Farrukh Naseem (MQM)

The true PTI never came into power besides Khan Sahab himself

What we need is a lot of young faces.

young faces attend to have better vision and also proactive.

 

[Patriot forever]

Go onto Aurat March's IG page, the latest post and read the comments

I was surprised

As if you did not knew before brother

 

[FOOLS_NIGHTMARE]

Because of repeated abuse of Army by your Maryam Qatari media cell

So you are trying to say our gallant Army just got scared by a NANI.

20 or so disgruntled MNAs in a total of 155 is majority?

Don't apply intellectual dishonesty here.
1)PTI in Baluchistan evaporated as its chief Sardar yar Mohammad Rind parted away.
2)PTI in Punjab is divided into many groups with many not contesting on PTI tickets.
3)PTI Sindh MPS and MNAs are bitterly divided.
4)KPK will give a shocking surprise soon.

Because they are all corrupt to the core and sellouts to foreign powers

Yeah really don't get me started on this new CHURAN.

Lost media support years ago when govt stopped giving them billion Rs lifafas like your Mian Mafroor

Only left are Imran Riaz and ARY clowns.

Why has this lady fled to Dubai!

https://twitter.com/x/status/1511042246556196867

Our fast is about to open have to go.

 

[FOOLS_NIGHTMARE]

Relevant quarters say the wrong impression was given about the military leadership endorsing view of the government

Contrary to claims by Prime Minister Imran Khan, the military leadership told a National Security Committee (NSC) meeting on March 27 that they had no evidence to suggest the United States had threatened or was involved in the conspiracy to seek the ouster of the PTI government.

On March 27, the high-powered NSC headed by PM Imran met to discuss the diplomatic cable which the PTI government claimed contained evidence of the US plot seeking a regime change in Pakistan.

The NSC after the meeting issued a statement expressing serious concerns over the non-diplomatic language used in the cable, saying it was tantamount to interference in the internal matters of Pakistan. The NSC then decided to issue a demarche to the United States.

Read more: PM Imran says 'not anti-American', wants relations based on mutual respect

The NSC statement was subsequently used by Deputy Speaker Qasim Suri to block a vote on the no-trust move in a development that triggered a constitutional crisis.

PM Imran claimed the NSC had endorsed the government's view that vote of no-confidence was part of the conspiracy to remove him from power.

But sources in the relevant quarters told The Express Tribune on Monday that a wrong impression was given about the military leadership endorsing the view of the government.

One source said the prime minister could make public minutes of the meeting because the NSC statement was only meant for the media. "Are there any minutes of the NSC meeting," the source asked. "Have all the participants sign on the minutes of the meeting, the source went on to say, adding that the minutes of the meeting were only considered official documents when all the participants of NSC signed. This suggests that the military leadership had not signed on the minutes of the meeting.

Read Will protest against PM Imran's 'civilian martial law': Shehbaz

The source further said that according to the relevant authorities that the US had not sent any letter to the government. It was the assessment of the Pakistani ambassador after his meeting with the US officials.

Another question being raised was about the delay in convening the NSC meeting. "Can the government show any action it has taken between March and March 27," the source pointed out.

Relevant authorities, the source also said, found no evidence of any linkage between the vote of no confidence and the diplomatic cable that had triggered the ongoing political and constitutional crises.

Another sign that the military leadership was reluctant to endorse the conspiracy allegations by the prime minister was the recent speech delivered by Army Chief General Qamar Javed Bajwa.

Unlike the rhetoric of the premier, the army chief said that Pakistan enjoyed an excellent and long term relationship with the United States, he said, adding that the US is Pakistan’s largest export partner.

General Qamar's statement on the Russian Ukraine crisis was also markedly different from the stance adopted by the PTI government.

The army chief not only expressed serious concerns over the Russian invasion but insisted that Russian aggression against a smaller nation could not be condoned.

This highlights the fact that the military leadership may not be on the same page with the PTI government on certain foreign policy issues.

However, it is intriguing that the military leadership is not making public any statement clarifying if they endorsed the foreign-funded plot against the prime minister or otherwise.

Following the tumultuous day in the history of Pakistan on Sunday, the chief military spokesperson said the army was "absolutely not" part of what happened in the National Assembly.

'Military finds no evidence of foreign conspiracy against PM | The Express Tribune

Relevant quarters say the wrong impression was given about the military leadership endorsing view of the government

tribune.com.pk