Dubious
RETIRED MOD
- Joined
- Jul 22, 2012
- Messages
- 37,717
- Reaction score
- 80
- Country
- Location
So tomorrow if you get a job and sign and agreement to be paid and the person doesn't pay you, this rule should apply?1. Of course it is up to Pakistan to bear the costs of its own geopolitical decisions, as it is up to it to reap the rewards too.
No it didnt, it cut off meaning there was a something left to cut off! You don't cut off something that isn't already flowing or agreed to...2. And USA paid all the items Pakistan billed it for according to the terms of the agreements.
As an ally not for being stabbed in the back...Maybe America doesnt know what an ally means hence what Trump is doing now3. The suffering is very real, I agree, but it is as a result of decisions that Pakistan made as a sovereign nation, and no one else.
Maybe you missed the metric fail guy's whine:4. What Trump said is "did nothing for US", not that Pakistan did nothing at all. Big difference between the two.
“They took him down but — look, look, there’s news right there, he lived in Pakistan, we’re supporting Pakistan, we’re giving them $1.3 billion a year, which we don’t give them anymore, by the way, I ended it because they don’t do anything for us, they don’t do a damn thing for us,” Trump responded.
1) indirect cost we bear ...Then you cant whine what the amount is!And as I said, whatever the costs, direct and indirect, as the result of decisions that Pakistan made for itself, and for those, it bears the responsibility.
2) Direct cost should be on America after all they agreed if they didn't, how did Trump close something they didnt agree to?