Plot to kill Modi and many BJP leaders

[sankranti]

This Paragraph is from the Same link you have provided........................Read the bolder part

However, according to activists, the issue is not whether Ishrat was a part of LeT or not. Former Uttar Pradesh Inspector General of Police, S.R. Darapuri, who is associated with the All India's People Front, said that the real issue was the circumstance in which she was killed: "On the basis of my experience I can say that the conduct of the Intelligence Bureau has been communal and biased against the minorities historically. The CBI investigation has proved that Ishrat was killed in a fake encounter at the behest of the BJP-led NDA government. The guilty IB officers led by Rajendra Kumar should be punished without any delay.

When???????

IB bases its judgement on their own experiences .......if their experiences with minorities 'historically' has been negative, one could hardly blame them.

Its funny the 'honest' CBI has excluded IB officer Rajendra Kumar's name from the list of accused

Worry not .....under congress ....even IB will be broken.

Anyway the case is that Ishrat was a LeT operative ....but 'secular' are crying that she was killed by encounter.

Maybe Joe Shearer can register FIR against all those 'encounter killings' in Mumbai. I can assure him that majority of those killed were Muslims .......that too in a congress ruled state.

 

[Joe Shearer]

When you are dealing with bigger threat, you have to think out of box..

That is pure nonsense. There is nothing that is possible outside the constitution. Not even the Army can open fire unless it is a warlike situation. That is why the AFSPA was needed, otherwise, by your peculiar, fascist train of thought, it would have been let loose, firing upon people left and right.

 

[SirHatesALot]

IB bases its judgement on their own experiences .......if their experiences with minorities 'historically' has been negative, one could hardly blame them.

Its funny the 'honest' CBI has excluded IB officer Rajendra Kumar's name from the list of accused

Worry not .....under congress ....even IB will be broken.

Anyway the case is that Ishrat was a LeT operative ....but 'secular' are crying that she was killed by encounter.

Maybe Joe Shearer can register FIR against all those 'econter killings' in Mumbai. I can assure him that majority of those killed were Muslims .......that too in a congress ruled state.

Charge sheet is not complete yet CBI has asked for more time may be they will be on supplementary charge sheet.

 

[Joe Shearer]

two aspects.

1. They were killed in fake encounter . the IB and police put weapons on their deadbodies and came up with lies that they were out to kill modi. their lies proven.


2. whether they were LeT members thats something IB and Modi police had to prove which they so far failed to do.

Once again, the heaven give me patience. Even a proven LeT member cannot be killed in cold blood. CANNOT.

 

[Beerbal]

Here's How Gujarat Police, IB Killed Ishrat Jahan | India | www.indiatimes.com

@Spring Onion : This is just news paper, they have leaked the CBI story (fantasy).. Isharat was Fiyadin, she has devoted her life for her god ..

The Gujrat police arranged her meeting with 72 Virgins..


CBI is liar, wait for some time after 2014 election things will be clear..

 

[sankranti]

Here is something more for the 'secular' Indians who are shedding crocodile tears for LeT terrorist Ishrat............and is quite gung ho about the Supreme court (except when it comes to SIT & Modi )

Needless to say ....our 'seclar' media left out that our current Chief Justice is a Muslim.



Advocate with links to terror outfit almost became high court judge - Times Of India

NEW DELHI: A high court recently came perilously close to having a judge with links with a terror organization.

Despite owing allegiance to a banned organization, the advocate's name was recommended by the high court collegium, headed by its chief justice, to the Supreme Court.

When the name of a person is recommended for appointment as HC judge, the same goes to the chief minister as well as the governor of the state and to the Supreme Court.

The Supreme Court collegium of judges, before taking a decision on the name, seeks details of his credentials not only from the high court concerned but also from sitting apex court judges who are acquainted with the functioning of that particular high court.

The said person, who had links with a terrorist organization, sailed through all these checks and balances and his name was recommended six months ago to the government for appointment by the collegium headed by the Chief Justice of India.

The Prime Minister's Office ordered a scrutiny of the people recommended along with this advocate by the SC collegium. The Intelligence Bureau, which is traditionally assigned this job, came out with a screaming report: that the lawyer had links with a terror organization.

The PMO sent the file recommending the name of the advocate back to the collegium, which immediately withdrew the recommendation for his appointment as a judge of the HC.

This instance lends credence to CJI-designate P Sathasivam's contention that the much maligned judges-selecting-judges system in India was not a unitary but a participatory method, in which the executive and judiciary had equal participation in selecting the most suitable person for appointment as judge in the SC and HCs.

In an interview to TOI, he said, "It is wrong to say that judiciary has the sole prerogative to appoint judges and that the executive has no say in the process of judicial appointment. Executive is one of the consultees in the participatory consultative process of judicial appointments. Thus, it is always open to the government to seek reconsideration of the recommendation made by the collegium, for strong reasons or adverse material in their possession. In fact, in the recent past, the government has exercised its power to keep a check and prevent appointment of persons considered to be unsuitable."

 

[Joe Shearer]

What you want to say this is the first such case in India??? Or this is special because belongs to Gujrat and can give reason to bash Modi????

I want to say that these cases should be stamped out and the perpetrators punished severely. From first to last. Other cases having happened before, or having happened later, IS NOT an excuse not to prosecute a culprit.

I want to say that finding a policeman breaking the law is bad enough, to have him supported by the political leadership, who should be the strongest supporters of the constitution and the rule of law, is the worst.

While I have my deep distrust of Modi, this part of his bad governance is not as important as the implications of murder. Any similar charges against any other Chief Minister would get my full support.

I hope that it would also get your full support.

 

[Spring Onion]

Once again, the heaven give me patience. Even a proven LeT member cannot be killed in cold blood. CANNOT.

many Modi supporters here are advocating such murderes if so then why they even need IB or Police they already have chota shakeel, Salim, Daud Ibrahim. Their world is coming into justification from the under one.

 

[Joe Shearer]

Certificate of Terrorism...


This is to Certify that ...Ishrat Jehan was a freedom fighter. She was doing her duty against Hindu India. She was taking revenge of the "fallen". and She was assigned to kill Mr Narendra Damodardas Modi.



She will be blessed with 72 Muscular men in heaven if she die in mission

Jakiur-Rehman-Lakhavi

I am SHOCKED at your utterly ****** and obscene post.

 

[Ammyy]

Your ignorance is really profound.

Even with a certificate of terrorism, an unarmed man, or woman or child, in police custody or otherwise apprehended or arrested, cannot be killed except by judicial sentence. The Gujarat police are not entitled to kill people on suspicion; there is a judicial procedure to establish guilt, and a procedure to sentence the guilty. Those processes are not with the police.

The IB gave information about suspects, they had no proof then. Such information about suspicious behaviour is not sufficient for anything except arrest and detention. For anything more, the police have to ask a judge. THEY HAVE NO RIGHTS OF THEIR OWN, TO FIND ANYONE GUILTY, TO PASS SENTENCE, OR TO EXECUTE SENTENCE. That is the difference between a democracy and a dictatorship. That is the difference between us and Pakistan under military rule, that we laugh at so much, or between us and China. If you do not believe in the rule of law, amend the constitution. Until you do that, the law stands.

Your point about the IB and the CBI is stupid. Really stupid.

The IB is the intelligence bureau. Its members do not carry arms, they are not concerned with local happenings, crime and punishment, they are responsible for gathering information. They do not file cases, they do not prosecute, they do not furnish evidence. I can give you the e-mail of former IB Directors, and you can ask them directly. When the IB gets information, they have to inform the police whose jurisdiction the suspected trouble comes under. In this case, it was the Gujarat police, nobody else.

It was for the Gujarat police to track the suspects, to establish suspicious behaviour, to seek a warrant, to arrest them, to produce them before a judge for preventive detection, OR to file charges, a charge sheet, and prosecute them through the public prosecutor, supplying the evidence for the prosecution.

The CBI is the Criminal Bureau of Investigation, the equivalent of the FBI, just as the IB is the domestic (not the international) version of the CIA, and looks into crime. It does not look into intelligence, only crime. It has its counterpart in every state, sometimes in cities, as the CID, the Criminal Investigation Department. It can be asked to look at a case only by the permission of the State Government, OR by direct order of a court. The central government can do little by itself unless it is asked to intervene. So the fairy stories about ManMohan Singh or Sonia Gandhi are just that, fairy stories. There are ways for the central government to influence its investigations, but the Supreme Court is making sure that the government gets off its back.

Please understand that a suspicious judiciary called in the CBI, not a political government.

Just tell me what you will considered as proof???

They may be killed in cold blood but yet they were terrorist including isharat jahan ...

I am sure every terrorist got killed by armed forces in India submit their certificate....

 

[Spring Onion]

@Spring Onion : This is just news paper, they have leaked the CBI story (fantasy).. Isharat was Fiyadin, she has devoted her life for her god ..

The Gujrat police arranged her meeting with 72 Virgins..


CBI is liar, wait for some time after 2014 election things will be clear..

Your comment proves that you do not have any logical reply hence the street language .


CBI is also India IB and Police is also Indian so if Modi supporters say CBI is a Liar and govt institutions say Modi, IB, Police is a Liar then it means entire India is flawed and filled with Lies?

it shows the raja mahraja princely states' era is existing.

 

[Joe Shearer]

CBI has become a caged parrot of congress

Perhaps.

Here they were not brought in by the Congress. Why are you bringing in the Congress? Because I notice that whenever a Sangh Parivar member is at a loss for arguments, the easy way out is to accuse his tormentor of being a Congress supporter.

Are you of that camp?

 

[SirHatesALot]

many Modi supporters here are advocating such murderes if so then why they even need IB or Police they already have chota shakeel, Salim, Daud Ibrahim. Their world is coming into justification from the under one.

I blame congress for this if they haven't fcuked up so bad this idiot would not have make its way up to Delhi now there is a high possibility that he might eventually become PM of this country.

 

[Joe Shearer]

is there a law which prevents wastage of crores of taxpayers money on terrorists in custody???

Yes, the same law that prevents you from being Picked up from home because some random rich guy or politically connected guy wants to give you trouble, and has paid money to the local police station. This law is called the Criminal Procedure Code. It determines how to identify crime and how to prosecute it.

 

[SirHatesALot]

Perhaps.

Here they were not brought in by the Congress. Why are you bringing in the Congress? Because I notice that whenever a Sangh Parivar member is at a loss for arguments, the easy way out is to accuse his tormentor of being a Congress supporter.

Are you of that camp?

Usually sangh parivar guys accused them of being muslims.